Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02128763

Dry Eye Assessment and Management Study

The objective of the DREAM study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids in relieving the symptoms of moderate to severe dry eye disease.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The study is designed to:

  • Test the hypothesis that omega-3 supplementation is an effective treatment for Dry Eye Disease (DED) in Primary Clinical Trial.
  • Better understand DED by describing and evaluating a comprehensive set of features of DED and treatment over 12 months of observation in a well-characterized group of patients.
  • Determine the effects of extended use and discontinuation of omega-3 through the Extension trial.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Greater than or equal to 2 of the following 4 signs in the same eye at screening and baseline visits (Same signs must be present at Screening and Baseline visits): Conjunctival staining present greater than or equal to 1 (out of possible score of 6 per eye), Corneal fluorescein staining present greater than or equal to 4 (out of a possible score of 15 per eye), Tear film break up time (TBUT) less than or equal to 7 seconds, Schirmer's test greater than or equal to 1 to less than or equal to 7 mm in 5 minutes.
  • Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score: 25-80 at screening, 21-80 at baseline.
  • Symptoms of DED for greater than or equal to 6 months.
  • Use of or desire to use artificial tears at least 2 times per day in preceding 2 weeks.
  • Ability to swallow large, soft gelcaps

Exclusion criteria

  • Allergic to ingredients in supplements or placebo
  • Contact lens wear
  • Pregnant, nursing, or lactating
  • Current ocular infection, inflammation, or acute allergic conjunctivitis
  • History of: ocular herpetic keratitis, ocular surgery in past 6 months, LASIK surgery, use of glaucoma medicine or surgery for glaucoma, liver disease, atrial fibrillation, hemophilia or bleeding tendencies
  • Currently on anticoagulation therapy
  • Eyelid abnormalities or extensive ocular scarring
  • Use of EPA/DHA supplements in excess of 1200 mg per dayi
  • Current use, insufficient washout period, or intent to change specific treatments for dry eye disease

Treatment and study plan

Omega-3 supplements

Drug

2000 mg EPA and 1000 mg DHA per day

Placebo

Drug

Olive oil gelcaps manufactured to mimic Omega-3 gelcaps

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean of Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score at 6 and 12 Months

    Time frame: 12 months

    Average of Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores from 6 and 12 months minus average of values from screening and eligibility confirmation visits. OSDI scores range from 0 to 100, with a score of 0 indicating no ocular discomfort and higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. The minimal clinically meaningful change in score is 10 points.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Greater Than or Equal to 10 Point Decrease in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) (at Least 10 Point Improvement in Symptoms)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Number of participants with at least a 10 point decrease from baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Change is the average score at 6 and 12 months minus the average score at the screening and eligibility confirmation visits. OSDI scores range from 0 to 100, with a score of 0 indicating no ocular discomfort and higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. A negative change score = improvement.

  2. Change in Brief Ocular Discomfort Index (BODI) Pain Interference Subscale

    Time frame: 12 months

    Brief Ocular Discomfort Index (BODI) Pain Interference subscale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater discomfort. Change is the average score at 6 and 12 months minus the average score at the screening and eligibility confirmation visits. A negative change score = improvement.

  3. Change From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Health Subscale

    Time frame: 12 months

    Medical Outcomes Study 36--Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Health Subscale. Subscale range is 0-100, with higher scores indicating better self reported physical health-related quality of life. Change is the average score at 6 and 12 months minus the average score at the screening and eligibility confirmation visits. A positive change score = improvement.

  4. Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Subscale

    Time frame: 12 months

    Medical Outcomes Study 26--Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Health Subscale. Mental Health subscale range is 0-100 with higher scores indicating better self reported mental health. Change is the average score at 6 and 12 months minus the average score at the screening and eligibility confirmation visits. A positive change score = improvement.

  5. Compliance With the Study Treatment Protocol as Measured by Change in Blood Levels of EPA

    Time frame: 12 months

    Change in EPA levels in red blood cells - percentage points. Change is the average level at 6 and 12 months minus the level at the eligibility confirmation visit. (Blood was not drawn at the screening visit.) If subjects are compliant, higher EPA levels in red blood cells in the Omega 3 group are expected and no change is expected in the placebo group. Data are missing for 20 subjects in the Omega 3 group and 15 subjects in the placebo group because blood was not drawn at the visit.

  6. Compliance With the Study Treatment Protocol as Measured by Change in Blood Levels of DHA

    Time frame: 12 months

    Change in DHA levels in red blood cells - percentage points. Change is the average score at 6 and 12 months minus the average score at eligibility confirmation visit (blood was not drawn at the screening visit. If compliant, higher DHA levels in red blood cells in the Omega 3 group is expected and no change is expected in the placebo group. Data are missing for 20 subjects in the Omega 3 group and 15 subjects in the placebo group.

  7. Compliance With the Study Treatment Protocol as Measured by Change in Blood Levels of Oleic Acid

    Time frame: 12 months

    Change in Oleic Acid (from olive oil) levels in red blood cells - percentage points. Change is the average score at 6 and 12 months minus the average score at eligibility confirmation visit. (Blood was not drawn at the screening visit.) Data are missing for 20 subjects in the Omega 3 group and 15 subjects in the placebo group because blood was not drawn.

  8. Change in Conjunctival Staining Score

    Time frame: 12 months

    Average change from 6 and 12 months minus average of values from screening and eligibility confirmation visits among eyes that qualified for the study. Scores range between 0-6, with higher scores indicate more severity. A negative change indicates improvement.

  9. Change in Schirmer's Test mm

    Time frame: 12 months

    The Schirmer's test measures the production of tears by an eye as measured by mm of wetting of a strip of paper attached to the lower lid for 5 minutes. Scores range from 0 to 30 or more mm. Lower scores indicate more severe dry eye. Change is the average change from 6 and 12 months minus average of values from screening and eligibility confirmation visits among eyes that qualified for the study.

  10. Change in Tear Film Break up Time, in Seconds

    Time frame: 12 months

    Average of values from 6 and 12 months minus average of values from screening and eligibility confirmation visits. Possible range of scores is 0->20. Low values indicate greater severity. A positive change score = improvement.

  11. Change in Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score

    Time frame: 12 months

    Average change from 6 and 12 months minus average of values from screening and eligibility confirmation visits among eyes that quality that qualified for the study. Possible range of scores is 0-15; higher scores indicate more severity. A negative change indicates improvement.

  12. Change in Visual Acuity

    Time frame: 12 months

    Visual acuity scores of 0-100 correspond to Snellen visual acuity levels of worse than 20/800 to 20/10, respectively. Higher change score = improved visual acuity.

  13. Change in Use of Artificial Tears and Other Treatments for Dry Eye Disease

    Time frame: 12 months

    Subjects with change in number of treatments used for dry eye disease, n.,(%)

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)- mm Hg

    Time frame: 12 months

    Eye pressure is measured in millimeters of mercury (mm Hg). Normal eye pressure ranges from 12-22 mm Hg, and eye pressure of greater than 22 mm Hg is considered higher than normal. Included as a safety measure.

  2. Change in Tear Break up Time by Keratography

    Time frame: 12 months

    Tear breakup time (TBUT) is used to assess for evaporative dry eye disease. In this measure, TBUT is measured using the keratograph machine. TBUT is recorded as the number of seconds that elapse between the last blink and the appearance of the first dry spot in the tear film. Change is the average of values from 6 and 12 months minus average of values from screening and eligibility confirmation visits.

  3. Change in Tear Meniscus Height( TMH) by Keratography

    Time frame: 12 months

    The purpose of the tear film is to reduce evaporation of natural tears. Assessment of the tear film meniscus is a quantitative measurement of tear film quantity. In this measure, TMH is measured using the keratograph machine. Change is the average of values from 6 and 12 months minus average of values from screening and eligibility confirmation visits.

  4. Change in Redness by Keratography

    Time frame: 12 months

    Change in ocular redness as measured using the keratograph machine. Change is the average of values from 6 and 12 months minus average of values from screening and eligibility confirmation visits. Title of the Scale used to measure outcome: Oculus Keratograph 5M R-scan, Scale Ranges: 0.0-4.0. A lower number indicates a better outcome (less redness).

  5. Change in Tear Osmolarity

    Time frame: 12 months

    Tear osmolarity measures the salt content of the tears. Higher the osmolarity indicate more severe dry eye. Change is the average of values from 6 and 12 months minus average of values from screening and eligibility confirmation visits. A lower change score indicates improvement.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania

Other

Collaborators

  • National Eye Institute (NEI)

Registry information

Acronym: DREAM

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2020
First posted
May 1, 2014
Registry last updated
Jul 19, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.