Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04541199

Driving Pressures in a Closed-loop and a Conventional Mechanical Ventilation Mode

In mechanically ventilated patients, driving pressure (ΔP) assess the strain applied to the respiratory system and is related to ICU mortality. The aim of this randomized cross-over trial was to compare ΔP selected by a closed-loop system and by physician tailored mechanical ventilation mode. Pediatric patients admitted to PICU will be enrolled if they were invasively ventilated without any detectable respiratory effort, hemodynamic instability, or significant leakages. Two 60 minute periods of ventilation determined by randomization in APV-CMV and ASV 1.1 will be compared. Settings were adjusted to reach the same minute ventilation in both modes. ΔP will be calculated as the difference between plateau pressure and total PEEP measured using end-inspiratory and end-expiratory occlusion maneuvers, respectively.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

1 month–18 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Health Sciences University Izmir Behçet Uz Child Health and Diseases education and research hospital

Izmir, Turkey/izmir, 35200, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

In 2015, Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC) determined the pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) definition. PALICC recommends using patient-specific tidal volume (VT) according to disease severity. Moreover, in the absence of transpulmonary pressure measurements (PL), an inspiratory plateau pressure limit of 28 cm H2O is recommended, allowing for slightly higher plateau pressures (29-32 cm H2O) for patients with reduced chest wall compliance. In adult ARDS, Amato et al. normalized VT to the compliance(C) by using driving pressure (ΔP) and reported that ΔP was the ventilation variable that best-stratified risk. Changes in ventilator settings resulting in a decrease in ΔP were associated with increased survival. One of the most common modes used in pediatric ventilation nowadays is synchronized controlled mandatory ventilation with adaptive pressure ventilation (APV-CMV). As compared to pressure control mode (P-CMV), APV-CMV prevents low or high VT when the compliance changes by adjusting the applied pressure. Adaptive support ventilation (ASV) is closed-loop ventilation mode, which for a given minute volume set by the clinician, adapts tidal volume (VT) and respiratory rate (RR) according to the patient's respiratory mechanics.

This prospective randomized cross over study aimed to compare ΔP between physician tailored APV-CMV mode and ASV 1.1 in pediatric mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory failure. After the enrollment, the patients' ventilation periods will be determined by randomization using sealed opaque envelopes. The minute ventilation, fraction of inspired O2 (FiO2) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) set by the clinician before study inclusion will be kept unchanged during all study periods. Patients will be ventilated in each mode for 60 minutes. Three consecutive -inspiratory and end-expiratory occlusion will be performed at 30 and 60 min and ΔP will be calculated for each period. Arterial blood gas will be measured at the end of each period. A wash-out period of 30 min using the ventilation mode and setting before inclusion will be performed in between the two study ventilation periods. ΔP will be calculated as the difference between plateau pressure (Pplat) and total PEEP and will be averaged for each ventilation period by using the mean of the six measurements mentioned above. VT will be calculated by integration of flow measurement. Resistance will be calculated by the least-squares fitting method. The expiratory time constant (RCexp) will be derived from the volume-flow curve at 75% of the VT and corresponding flow value. Static compliance (Cstat) will be calculated as VT divided by ΔP.

The primary outcome will be ΔP. The secondary outcome will be VT, RR, Pplat, Ti, Te, Cstat, Resistance, RCexp, pH, PaO2, PaCO2 A pilot study was performed to calculate the sample size. The mean ΔP was 12.4 (±3.31) cm H2O in ASV 1.1 and 13.5 (±4.2) cm H2O in APV-CMV. By using these pilot data, and assuming the power of 0.95 and α-error of 0.05, investigators have calculated the study size as 26 patients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All the mechanically ventilated children
  • between 1-months and 18-years-old
  • without any detectable respiratory effort
  • whose clinical condition are not foreseen to change within the next 3 hours

Exclusion criteria

  • septic shock
  • brain death diagnose,
  • with a leak equal or more than 40% of the current VT,
  • receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or targeted temperature management (TTM),

Treatment and study plan

Closed Loop

Device

RR and VT will be selected according to the respiratory mechanics by closed loop algorithm

Conventional

Device

RR, VT, Ti will be selected by the clinician according to the respiratory mechanics

Primary outcomes

  1. Driving pressure

    Time frame: at the end of period (60th minute)

    measured with an occlusion maneuver as the difference between plateau pressure (Pplat) and total PEEP

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tidal Volume (VT)

    Time frame: continuous measurement over 1 hour

    Integrated from flow measurement

  2. Respiratory rate (RR)

    Time frame: continuous measurement over 1 hour

    Number of mechanically triggered breaths by the ventilator in 60 seconds

  3. Expiratory time constant (RCexp)

    Time frame: continious measurement over 1 hour

  4. Static compliance (Cstat)

    Time frame: continuous measurement over 1 hour

    will be derived from volume-flow curve at 75% of the VT and corresponding flow value

  5. Inspiratory time (Ti)

    Time frame: continuous measurement over 1 hour

    Time used for inspiration during each mechanically triggered breath

  6. Expiratory time (Te)

    Time frame: continuous measurement over 1 hour

    Time used for expiration during each mechanically triggered breath

  7. pH

    Time frame: one measurement after 1 hour

    the measure of the hydrogen ion (H-) concentration in arterial blood

  8. PaO2

    Time frame: one measurement after 1 hour

    measurement of oxygen pressure in arterial blood

  9. PaCO2

    Time frame: one measurement after 1 hour

    measurement of CO2 pressure in arterial blood

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Dr. Behcet Uz Children's Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Crossover Trial to Compare Driving Pressures in a Closed-loop and a Conventional Mechanical Ventilation Mode in Pediatric Patients

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Sep 9, 2020
Registry last updated
Aug 31, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.