Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
NCT Number: NCT05482204
This study tests the effect of two climate change menu labels, one indicating 'low climate impact' and the other indicating 'high climate impact' on ordering choices and perceptions of healthfulness of food ordered in an online randomized experiment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
The objective of this study is to examine how climate impact menu labels influence US adults' ordering and perceptions via an online randomized experiment. Participants were randomized to view one of 3 fast food menus online and then choose an item that they would like to order. One menu 'control' had QR code labels, the second had "low climate impact" labels on items with lower greenhouse gas emissions (vegetarian, chicken or fish items), the third had "high climate impact" labels on beef items. After the ordering task participants answered questions about what label they saw on the menu, how healthy they thought the item they ordered was, and how much the label discouraged them from eating high climate impact items.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Menu labels indicating low climate impact on chicken, fish, and vegetarian food items on a simulated online fast food menu.
Menu labels indicating high climate impact on beef food items on a simulated online fast food menu.
Time frame: 1 minute
The primary outcome is a binary indicator of whether or not the participant selected during the ordering task was a sustainable (chicken, fish, or vegetarian) menu item (1) vs. an unsustainable (beef) menu item (0).
Before viewing the fast food menu, participants were asked to imagine they are at a restaurant and about to order dinner. They were asked to select one item they want to order for themselves. Participants could select one item to order before moving on.
Time frame: < 1 minute
Perceptions of how healthy the meal ordered was (on a scale of 1=very unhealthy to 7=very healthy)
Time frame: <1 minute
This outcomes used 1 item from the 3 item UNC-PME scale to measure how much the assigned label discouraged the participant from wanting to consume items with a high impact on climate change. Responses are measured on a 5-point Likert scale from 1=Strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree. The exact question text is: "How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Information on the menu discouraged me from wanting to consume menu items with a high impact on climate change."
Time frame: < 1 minute
The Nutrition Profile Index score (0-100) of the ordered item
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Other
Acronym: Climate Labels
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06648226
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07536126
Behavior, Feeding Behavior
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06596564
Behavior, Body Weight
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05907616
Behavior, Feeding Behavior
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
View Trial Details