Do Immediate Digital Workflows Increase Patient Value?

Digital implant workflows enable guided surgery, intraoral scanning, and standardized restorative components, and may reduce treatment burden while supporting efficient, patient-centered care. In posterior single-tooth implant rehabilitation, immediate and delayed placement protocols have been extensively evaluated from a biological perspective, but evidence on patient-reported oral health-related quality of life and workflow efficiency remains limited.

The study compares two standardized digital posterior implant rehabilitation pathways that differ in implant placement timing: immediate placement (Type 1C) versus delayed placement (Type 4B). Participants requiring extraction and single implant therapy in posterior premolar or molar sites will be enrolled at two geographically distinct centers. The immediate workflow combines atraumatic extraction and guided implant placement in one surgical session. The delayed workflow includes extraction and ridge preservation as indicated, followed by implant placement after approximately 16 weeks of healing. Both groups will receive guided implant placement with Straumann BLC implants and a screw-retained monolithic zirconia crown according to the protocol.

The primary objective is to compare the overall treatment-related impact on oral health-related quality of life during the active treatment phase using OHIP-14. Key secondary objectives are to compare workflow-related patient experience, objective workflow efficiency, and peri-implant soft tissue contour changes, while monitoring clinical, radiographic, esthetic, implant-related, and prosthetic safety outcomes.

Inclusion criteria

• Adults aged 18 years or older.
• Indication for single implant therapy in a posterior premolar or molar extraction site.
• Good oral hygiene with FMPS ≤20%.
• Controlled periodontitis according to protocol definition.
• At least one natural tooth adjacent to the implant site and presence of an antagonist tooth.
• Ability to comply with study procedures and provide written informed consent.
• Adequate bone volume for immediate or delayed placement.
• Extraction site suitable for centrally positioned, prosthetically driven implant placement using straight prosthetic components.
• Ability to achieve 3-4 mm circumferential implant engagement in native bone along the planned implant axis while maintaining safety distance from vital structures.
• For molar sites, septal bone classified as Smith & Tarnow Type A or Type B, including cases requiring closed sinus floor elevation.
• Post-extraction socket presenting as a contained or partially contained defect with at least three relatively intact socket walls and no individual socket wall vertical defect >5 mm.
• No facial soft-tissue dehiscence or mucogingival defect associated with buccal bone dehiscence.

Exclusion criteria

• • Known or suspected poor compliance, alcohol abuse, or substance abuse.

• Systemic or local contraindications to implant surgery.
• History of head/neck radiotherapy or recent malignancy within 5 years.
• Use of medications affecting bone metabolism.
• Bisphosphonate use within the past 5 years.
• Uncontrolled periodontal disease.
• Heavy smoking (>10 cigarettes/day).
• Pregnancy or lactation.
• Teeth with periapical lesions >5 mm in greatest diameter, or sockets demonstrating a large cortical perforation >5 mm in greatest dimension on CBCT.