Prehospital Emegency Medical Service, Central Denmark Region, Denmark
Aarhus N, Central Jutland, 8200, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT05742412
In the Emergency Medical Dispatch Center, all EMS dispatchers were divided into one of two clusters with 11 EMS dispatchers in each cluster. Because of few clusters, a matched-pair (MP) design was used based on the average proportion of the dispatched level of urgency (highest level of urgency used as primary matching criteria), years of employment and the average duration of emergency calls in a 3-months period (1st of January 2022 - 31st of March 2022) before the implementation of video streaming. Newly employed personnel where matching was not possible were randomly assigned to one of the two clusters. Prior to the study period, video streaming was gradually implemented in the intervention group during a 6-months period (1st of July 2022 - 31st of December 2022).
Using a cluster randomized setup, the aim was to investigate differences in the management of emergency calls (dispatches) when emergency medical service (EMS) dispatchers use video streaming compared with telephone-only (audio-only) communication. All emergency calls will be randomly distributed between the two clusters.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Aarhus N, Central Jutland, 8200, Denmark
In Denmark, all emergency medical calls are answered by a nurse- or paramedic trained in dispatching emergencies. The EMS dispatcher determines the level of urgency and the type and number of resources to be allocated (e.g., ambulance, physician-manned vehicle and/or physician-manned helicopter (HEMS). The decision-making process is supported by a standardized national criteria-based dispatch tool called Danish Index for Emergency Care (DI). DI is a tool that classifies the patient's main complaint into different symptom groups (chapters) to determine the level of urgency required and which resources to allocate.
As standard, emergency calls are based on telephone-only (audio-only) communication, which might limit the understanding of a complex clinical presentation.
Previous studies suggest that a visualized clinical presentation could aid the EMS dispatchers in their decision-making and dispatch.
The decision on implementing video streaming has been made by the management board of the Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Denmark. It has been decided to implement video streaming gradually to allow for this cluster randomized study. Because video streaming is a deemed part of the standard operating procedure (SOP), ethical approval from our local ethical committee is waived. After the study period, video streaming will be implemented in the current control group as the decision to use video streaming as SOP has already been decided.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Adding video streaming as a technical adjunct to the otherwise audio-based-only communication during emergency medical dispatch
Usual care: Audio-based-only communication using telephone during emergency medical dispatch
Time frame: Continuously stored during the study period (4 months). Data collection from study termination.
Defined by the dispatch code generated by the computer-aided dispatch software Logis and stored in the EMDC database
Time frame: Continuously stored during the study period (4 months). Data collection from study termination.
Defined by the dispatch code generated by the computer-aided dispatch software Logis and stored in the EMDC database graded in 5 levels.
Time frame: Data collection 30 days after study termination (31st of May 2023)
Mortality within 30 days after study inclusion
Time frame: Continuously stored during the study period (4 months). Data collection from study termination.
The number and proportion of participant where the level of urgency dispatched by the EMS dispatcher (determining the speed of the ambulance transport to the scene) is identical to the level of urgency determined by the EMS provider (determining the speed of the ambulance transport to hospital).
Time frame: Data collection 90 days after study termination or until last patient discharged or dead
Time from initial hospital admission to hospital discharge to home or care facility
Time frame: Continuously stored during the study period (4 months). Data collection from study termination.
Number and proportion of patients needing ICU admission during hospital stay
Time frame: Continuously stored during the study period (4 months). Data collection from study termination.
Number and proportion of emergency medical calls, where the EMS dispatcher change the level of urgency during the emergency medical call.
Time frame: Continuously stored during the study period (4 months). Data collection from study termination.
Change in allocated resources (e.g., number of ambulances, helicopter, physician manned vehicles etc.) during the emergency call compared with the initially allocated resources.
Time frame: 24-hours after study termination
The number and rate of readmission to hospital within 24 hours among emergency medical calls dispatched at lowest level of urgency (response level E) without allocated prehospital resources (patients only provided with an advice from the EMS dispatcher).
Time frame: Continuously stored during the study period (4 months). Data collection from study termination.
The duration of the total call time in minutes.
Time frame: Continuously stored during the study period (4 months). Data collection from study termination.
Time (in minutes) from the start of the emergency medical call to the dispatch (allocated resources with a level of urgency) by EMS dispatcher.
Time frame: Continuously stored during the study period (4 months). Data collection from study termination.
Time (in minutes) from EMS provider arrival at scene to departure with the patient.
Time frame: Continuously stored during the study period (4 months). Data collection from study termination.
Number of participants achieving ROSC after cardiac arrest in the prehospital or in-hospital phase of treatment
Time frame: Data collection 90 days after study termination (31st of July 2023)
Among patients surviving cardiac arrest, neurological outcome will be measured by cerebral performance category (CPC) obtained in the in-hospital electronical patient record 90 days after study inclusion. The CPC ranges from 1 to 5. 1 representing intact function and 5 representing brain death. Favorable neurological function is defined as CPC 1 or 2 and an unfavorable function as 3-5
Time frame: Data collection 90 days after study termination (31st of July 2023)
Among patients with cardiac arrest, neurological outcome measured by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) obtained in the in-hospital electronical patient record 90 days after study inclusion. The mRS ranges from 0 to 6. 0 representing no symptoms and 6 representing death. Favorable neurological outcome is defined as mRS 0-2.
Time frame: Continuously stored during the study period (4 months). Data collection from study termination.
Recognition of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) by the EMS dispatcher based on the criteria-based dispatch reference work (Danish Index, chapter 26 and the subheadings A03, A04 and B06)
Time frame: Continuously stored during the study period (4 months). Data collection from study termination.
Rate of acute stroke treatment (i.v. thrombolysis and/or endovascular treatment (EVT)) among patients with a timely contact to the EMDC (within 3 hours (thrombolysis) and 24 hours (EVT)).
Time frame: Continuously stored during the study period (4 months). Data collection from study termination.
Direct admission by ambulance to a hospital offering acute stroke treatment.
Time frame: Continuously stored during the study period (4 months). Data collection from study termination.
Time from symptom onset (stroke symptoms) to initiated treatment in-hospital with either iv. thrombolysis or EVT.
Time frame: Continuously stored during the study period (4 months). Data collection from study termination.
Number and proportion of children (< 15 years of age) dispatched lowest level of urgency (not admitted to hospital and only provided with an advice from the EMS dispatcher)
Time frame: Continuously stored during the study period (4 months). Data collection from study termination.
Re-admissions to hospital within 24 hours from a prior emergency call among children (< 15 years of age) initially dispatched with lowest level of urgency (response level E only provided an advice from the EMS dispatcher)
Time frame: Continuously stored during the study period (4 months). Data collection from study termination.
Defined by the dispatch code generated by the computer-aided dispatch software Logis and stored in the EMDC database
Central Denmark Region
Other
Criteria-based Ambulance Management - Video Indexation VS Standard Indexation On Non-selected Emergency Calls
Acronym: CAM-VISION
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07472335
Acute Disease, Aged
Gothenburg, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT06645288
Airway Management, Cricothyroidotomy
Harderwijk, Gelderland, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT07632430
Cardiac Arrest, Out-Of-Hospital, Cardiovascular Diseases
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07503470
Point of Care Testing, Prehospital Emergency Care
Aarhus N, Denmark
View Trial Details