AOUS
Siena, 53100, Italy
NCT Number: NCT04683016
The presence of periodontal diseases in patients has been associated to a worsened quality of life overall. Many different indices have been proposed over time in order to evaluate patient's centred outcomes. In particular, the most thorough questionnaire proposed so far is the Oral Health Impact Profile 49 (OHIP-49), which is composed of 49 questions. Despite its validity being unquestionable, OHIP-49 was found to be too time-consuming for the clinical scenario and, therefore, its shortened 14-question version has been proposed. A more in-depth knowledge of how these parameters change before and after periodontal treatment could enable clinicians to tailor the treatment plan according to the patients' needs.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Observational
Siena, 53100, Italy
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients will be asked two sets of questions:
All these two sets of questions will be asked before and after non surgical periodontal therapy
Time frame: The questionnaire will be carried out at baseline and re-evaluation (3 months after non-surgical periodontal treatment). The change in the Brief IPQ values at baseline and after 3 months will be considered as the primary outcome measure.
Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire consists of 9 questions, each one evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 (minimum score of 0, maximum score of 90). Higher scores mean a higher patient's perception of the disease (higher scores mean worse outcome).
Time frame: The questionnaire will be carried out at baseline and re-evaluation (3 months after non-surgical periodontal treatment). The change in the OHIP-14 values at baseline and after 3 months will be considered as the primary outcome measure.
14 questions about the impact of oral health on the quality of life; each question will be evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 (minimum score of 0, maximum score of 70). Higher scores mean that patient's oral health impacts more significantly on their quality of life (higher scores, worse outcomes).
Time frame: FMBS will be calculated at baseline and re-evaluation (3 months after non-surgical periodontal treatment). The change in the FMBS at baseline and after 3 months will be considered as the secondary outcome measure.
Full Mouth Bleeding Score will be calculated as the percentage of sites with Bleeding on Probing on the total number of sites (percentage ranging between 0% and 100%). Higher scores of FMBS mean more periodontal inflammation and therefore worse oral health (higher scores of FMBS, worse outcomes).
University of Siena
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07731412
Body Weight, Mouth Diseases
Târgu Mureş, Romania
View Trial DetailsNCT06366295
Mouth Diseases, Periodontal Diseases
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT07721337
Mouth Diseases, Periodontal Diseases
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07488403
Gingival Diseases, Gingivitis
Antalya, KONYAALTI, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details