Agri Ibrahim Cecen University Faculty of Health Sciences
AĞRI, Merkez, 04100, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07367906
This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of a patient safety-focused digital microlearning program on nursing students before and during surgical clinical practice.
Nursing students may face patient-safety and clinical decision-making challenges when moving from classroom learning to clinical settings. This study examined whether short, structured, scenario-based digital learning modules could improve patient-safety awareness, clinical error recognition, decision-making under stress, clinical practice readiness, and self-confidence.
Second-year undergraduate nursing students were randomly assigned to either a digital microlearning plus standard education group or a standard education control group. Outcomes were measured at baseline before the program, immediately after the intervention, at the end of the first week of surgical clinical practice, and at the end of the seventh week of surgical clinical practice. Weekly ecological momentary assessment prompts were also used during clinical practice to examine safety-related behavioral transfer.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
AĞRI, Merkez, 04100, Turkey (Türkiye)
The transition from classroom-based nursing education to surgical clinical practice is a critical period for patient safety. During this phase, limited clinical experience, increased responsibility, unfamiliar ward routines, and supervisory dynamics may affect students' ability to recognize patient-safety risks, identify clinical errors, prioritize action, and communicate concerns appropriately.
This study was designed as a single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial with an explanatory mixed-methods extension. It was conducted at the Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Agri Ibrahim Cecen University. The recruitment frame consisted of second-year undergraduate nursing students registered for the relevant surgical nursing course and preparing to begin surgical clinical practice. Of 111 students registered on the course, 21 were excluded before randomization because of previous course failure or repetition, absenteeism, or other ineligibility. Ninety students were randomized in a 1:1 ratio and analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle.
Participants were assigned to either a digital microlearning intervention group or a standard education control group. The intervention group received a patient safety-focused digital microlearning program delivered online for seven consecutive days in addition to standard education. The program consisted of short, scenario-based modules lasting approximately 3-5 minutes each. Module content addressed patient identification, medication safety, patient-safety risk recognition, clinical error recognition, prioritization, escalation, and decision-making under stress. The control group received standard patient-safety education as part of the undergraduate nursing curriculum without additional digital microlearning.
Outcome measures were collected at four time points: baseline before the program (T0), immediately after completion of the intervention (T1), at the end of the first week of surgical clinical practice (T2), and at the end of the seventh week of surgical clinical practice (T3). Primary outcomes were patient-safety awareness and clinical error recognition performance. Secondary outcomes included clinical decision-making under stress, clinical practice readiness, clinical self-confidence, behavioral transfer during clinical practice, and acceptability of the digital microlearning program.
During the seven weeks of surgical clinical practice, students also completed weekly ecological momentary assessment prompts on their clinical practice day. These prompts captured patient-safety risk noticing, appropriate response, escalation or supervisor discussion, perceived confidence, stress, and reflective depth. In addition, an explanatory qualitative component was conducted with selected intervention participants to explore how digital microlearning supported clinical readiness and safety-oriented behavior. The qualitative component focused on mechanisms such as scenario recall, cognitive load reduction, confidence to speak up, and implementation conditions.
This study involved an educational intervention only and did not include invasive procedures, drugs, or medical devices. Participation was voluntary, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was approved by the Agri Ibrahim Cecen University Scientific Research Ethics Committee and was conducted in accordance with ethical principles for research involving human participants.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A structured digital microlearning program consisting of short, scenario-based online modules lasting approximately 3-5 minutes each. The program was delivered over seven consecutive days and focused on surgical patient-safety readiness, including patient identification, medication safety, patient-safety risk recognition, clinical error recognition, prioritization, escalation, and clinical decision-making under stress.
Time frame: Baseline before the program (T0), immediately after completion of the intervention (T1), end of the first week of surgical clinical practice (T2), and end of the seventh week of surgical clinical practice (T3).
Change in patient-safety awareness assessed using the Patient Safety Awareness Questionnaire. The questionnaire evaluates students' understanding of patient-safety principles, patient-safety risk recognition, and safe clinical practices in surgical care. Total scores are converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater patient-safety awareness.
Time frame: Baseline before the program (T0), immediately after completion of the intervention (T1), end of the first week of surgical clinical practice (T2), and end of the seventh week of surgical clinical practice (T3).
Change in clinical error recognition performance assessed using a scenario-based Clinical Error Recognition Test. The test evaluates students' ability to identify patient-safety risks and potential clinical errors in surgical clinical scenarios. Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better clinical error recognition performance.
Time frame: Baseline before the program (T0), immediately after completion of the intervention (T1), end of the first week of surgical clinical practice (T2), and end of the seventh week of surgical clinical practice (T3).
Change in clinical decision-making performance under stress assessed using scenario-based decision-making evaluations simulating stressful surgical clinical situations. Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better clinical decision-making performance under stress.
Time frame: Baseline before the program (T0), immediately after completion of the intervention (T1), end of the first week of surgical clinical practice (T2), and end of the seventh week of surgical clinical practice (T3).
Change in perceived readiness for surgical clinical practice assessed using the Clinical Practice Readiness Scale. Scores are converted to a 0-100 scale for comparability, with higher scores indicating greater perceived readiness for clinical practice.
Time frame: Baseline before the program (T0), immediately after completion of the intervention (T1), end of the first week of surgical clinical practice (T2), and end of the seventh week of surgical clinical practice (T3).
Change in clinical self-confidence for surgical clinical practice assessed using a self-confidence scale related to clinical preparedness and supervised patient-safety practice. Scores are converted to a 0-100 scale for comparability, with higher scores indicating greater clinical self-confidence.
Time frame: Weekly during surgical clinical practice weeks 1 through 7.
Behavioral transfer during surgical clinical practice assessed using weekly ecological momentary assessment prompts. The index captures patient-safety risk noticing, appropriate response, escalation or supervisor discussion, perceived confidence, stress, and reflective depth during clinical practice. Scores are converted to a 0-100 index, with higher scores indicating stronger safety-oriented behavioral transfer.
Time frame: Immediately after completion of the intervention (T1).
Participant satisfaction, perceived usefulness, usability, and perceived relevance of the digital microlearning program assessed using a post-intervention program acceptability questionnaire in the intervention group. Total scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability and perceived usefulness.
Agri Ibrahim Cecen University
Other
Digital Microlearning for Patient-Safety Readiness Before Surgical Clinical Practice: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Ecological Momentary Assessment and Mixed-Methods Integration
Acronym: DigiM-2026
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02401711
Educational Safety Curriculum, Medical Education
View Trial DetailsNCT07570134
Interprofessional Relations, Medical Education
Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07714655
Clinical Competence, History Taking
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07615543
Medical Education
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details