The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
NCT Number: NCT07714655
This randomized controlled trial evaluated a large language model-based Intelligent Simulated Patient System (ISPS) for gastroenterology history-taking education. The system integrates retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), electronic health record-based knowledge retrieval, virtual patient interaction, and automated scoring. Ninety medical students were randomly assigned to conventional training or ISPS-assisted training. Primary outcomes included history-taking completeness and diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes included empathy performance and technology acceptance.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
History-taking is a fundamental clinical skill in gastroenterology because digestive diseases often present with complex and nonspecific symptoms that require systematic information gathering for accurate diagnosis. Traditional history-taking education relies on bedside teaching, standardized patients, and faculty supervision. However, these approaches are limited by high educational costs, restricted access to standardized patients, variability in assessment, and limited opportunities for repeated practice.
This study developed an Intelligent Simulated Patient System (ISPS) powered by a large language model (LLM) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) technology for gastroenterology education. The system was built using de-identified electronic health records, clinical guidelines, and textbook-based knowledge to create realistic virtual patients capable of maintaining disease-specific characteristics throughout multi-turn conversations. In addition to virtual patient simulation, the platform includes an automated scoring system that evaluates history-taking completeness using semantic similarity matching and logical completeness assessment based on predefined clinical rubrics.
This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether ISPS-assisted training improves clinical history-taking skills compared with conventional teaching methods. Ninety medical students who had completed courses in diagnostics and internal medicine were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either an ISPS training group or a conventional teaching group. The intervention lasted four weeks.
Participants in the control group received conventional clinical education, including bedside teaching, case-based learning, and supervised clinical discussions. Participants in the intervention group independently completed repeated history-taking practice using the ISPS platform with virtual patients representing common gastroenterology diseases.
The primary outcomes are history-taking completeness scores and diagnostic accuracy assessed during a standardized Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Secondary outcomes include empathy performance during physician-patient communication and participants' acceptance of the ISPS assessed using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire.
The study also evaluates the reliability of the automated scoring system by comparing AI-generated scores with expert ratings using Pearson correlation, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis.
The findings are expected to provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of large language model-based virtual patient systems for improving clinical communication skills, standardized assessment, and competency-based medical education in gastroenterology.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants received four weeks of self-directed training using the Intelligent Simulated Patient System (ISPS), a large language model-based educational platform developed for gastroenterology history-taking training. The system integrates retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), de-identified electronic health records, disease-specific knowledge retrieval, virtual patient simulation, automated history-taking assessment, and individualized feedback. Participants independently selected clinical cases, conducted repeated history-taking interviews with virtual patients, received automated evaluations of history-taking completeness, and reviewed personalized feedback throughout the intervention period.
Participants received conventional clinical education for four weeks, including bedside teaching, case-based learning, paper-based medical record review, and faculty-guided clinical discussions according to the standard curriculum.
Time frame: Immediately after the 4-week intervention
Diagnostic accuracy was defined as the proportion of participants who correctly identified the primary diagnosis during the standardized OSCE.
Time frame: Immediately after the 4-week intervention
History-taking completeness was evaluated during a standardized Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) using a validated rubric with a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate more complete history-taking performance.
Time frame: Immediately after the 4-week intervention
Empathy performance was assessed during the standardized OSCE using a quantitative empathy assessment scale developed from the "Understand the Patient's Perspective" dimension of the SEGUE framework.
Time frame: Immediately after completion of the intervention
Participants' acceptance of the Intelligent Simulated Patient System was assessed using a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)-based questionnaire evaluating perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived enjoyment, behavioral intention, and perceived risks.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
Other
Development and Evaluation of an Intelligent Simulated Patient System Based on Large Language Models for Gastroenterology History-Taking Education: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07686497
Clinical Competence, Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma (FAST)
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT06844097
Cervical Cancer Screening, Clinical Competence
View Trial DetailsNCT07615543
Medical Education
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07679672
Clinical Reasoning, Medical Education
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details