Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02302274

Diagnostic Value and Safety of Flecainide Infusion Test in Brugada Syndrome

The study aims to use flecainide infusion test as diagnostic test to unmask concealed Brugada Syndrome cases. It proposes to assess the safety profile of this test in US patients and its higher sensitivity when compared to procainamide infusion (the conventional drug used in the USA). As a substudy it proposes to apply this test to early ARVC cases in order to evaluate if ECG changes similar to those seen in Brugada Syndrome could be unmasked by flecainide iv.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Brugada Syndrome is an inherited arrhythmogenic disease responsible for life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in young individuals with structural normal heart.

It is characterized by a peculiar ECG pattern, but this pattern could be intermittent. The infusion of sodium channel blockers (flecainide, ajmaline, procainamide) is used to unmask a concealed ECG pattern, thus providing an essential contribution to the diagnosis of this condition.

In the current clinical practice in USA, only procainamide is used for diagnostic purposes; however in Europe only ajmaline and flecainide, available as iv formulations, are widely used. European and Japanese studies have demonstrated that the use of flecainide harbors less risks of adverse events in patients and may have a higher accuracy in unraveling the presence of the disease.

In the present study the investigators propose to use flecainide infusion test in the Cardiovascular Genetics Program at NYUMC, in order to assess its sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing the disease and compare the incidence of adverse events to that observed during procainamide use.

Additionally, the investigators propose to extend the study protocol to patients with a suspect diagnosis of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Tachycardia (ARVC), due to the possible overlap between the two conditions.

The study has the following aims:

  • To demonstrate the higher sensitivity and specificity of flecainide iv infusion compared to procainamide infusion for the diagnosis of Brugada Syndrome.
  • To demonstrate that flecainide is equally safe or safer than procainamide to use for diagnosing Brugada Syndrome.
  • To demonstrate that flecainide has high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing also some patients with early stage Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Suspect diagnosis of Brugada Syndrome or ARVC
  • Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and suspect concealed Brugada syndrome
  • Family history of Brugada Syndrome
  • Family history of unexpected cardiac sudden death

Exclusion criteria

  • Type 1 Brugada Syndrome ECG
  • Pregnancy
  • History and/or evidence of ischemic cardiomyopathy
  • Recent myocardial infarction
  • Allergy or known adverse reaction to flecainide

Treatment and study plan

flecainide iv

Drug

infusion over 10 min

Primary outcomes

  1. diagnosis

    Time frame: 10 minutes

    conversion from type 2/3 Brugada ECG to diagnostic type 1 ECG

Secondary outcomes

  1. absence of arrhythmias elicited during the test

    Time frame: 10 minutes

    number of arrhythmias caused by

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

NYU Langone Health

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Nov 26, 2014
Registry last updated
Apr 18, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.