Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China
NCT Number: NCT07576660
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major cause of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in critically ill patients and is associated with substantial mortality. Current management is largely supportive, and no pharmacologic therapy has been shown consistently to reduce mortality in a broad population of patients with ARDS. Inflammation plays a central role in the pathogenesis of ARDS. Excessive inflammatory activation contributes to alveolar-capillary injury, impaired gas exchange, and progression of organ dysfunction. Glucocorticoids may mitigate these processes and have been associated in some studies with improved clinical outcomes, including shorter duration of mechanical ventilation. However, the effect of glucocorticoids on survival remains uncertain.
ARDS is a heterogeneous syndrome with diverse etiologies, and treatment response may vary according to the underlying cause. A post hoc analysis of the Dex-ARDS trial suggested that the treatment effect of glucocorticoids may be greater in ARDS caused by pneumonia or extrapulmonary sepsis. In a cross-sectional survey of 135 patients with ARDS from 20 ICUs in China, pneumonia- and extrapulmonary sepsis-associated ARDS accounted for 77.6% of cases, indicating that these are the predominant etiologic subtypes encountered in clinical practice in China. More importantly, compared with ARDS attributable to other causes, pneumonia- and extrapulmonary sepsis-associated ARDS has been associated with higher mortality, suggesting a greater disease burden, worse prognosis, and a more urgent need for improved treatment strategies. On this basis, the present trial will enroll patients with ARDS caused by sepsis, including pneumonia and extrapulmonary sepsis.
The primary hypothesis of this study is that, among patients with sepsis-associated ARDS, dexamethasone plus usual care, as compared with placebo plus usual care, will reduce 90-day all-cause mortality. We therefore designed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial to evaluate the clinical efficacy of dexamethasone in patients with sepsis-associated ARDS. The primary objective is to compare dexamethasone plus usual care with placebo plus usual care with respect to 90-day all-cause mortality.
Trial opening soon.
Get NotifiedAll sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
(1) New or worsening respiratory symptoms or respiratory failure (2) Pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiography or computed tomography, or B-lines or consolidation on lung ultrasonography, not fully explained by pleural effusion, lobar or whole-lung collapse or atelectasis, or pulmonary nodules. Patients with unilateral pulmonary infiltrates, B-lines, or consolidation are eligible (3) Respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload (4) Hypoxemia defined as PaO₂/FiO₂ of 300 mm Hg or less, or SpO₂/FiO₂ of 315 or less, with SpO₂ no greater than 97%.
Exclusion criteria
Participants assigned to dexamethasone will receive 20 mg intravenously as soon as possible after randomization. Beginning after 10:00 am on the next calendar day following randomization, dexamethasone 20 mg will be administered once daily through day 5, followed by dexamethasone 10 mg once daily from Day 6 to Day 10.
Other names: Dexamethasone sodium phosphate injection, 5 mg/1 mL
Participants assigned to the placebo group will receive 0.9% sodium chloride injection as matching placebo, administered according to the same schedule as dexamethasone
Time frame: From randomization (day 0) to day 90 (inclusive)
The proportion of participants who die from any cause between randomization (day 0) and day 90 (inclusive)
Time frame: From randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive)
The number of days from randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive) during which the patient is alive and successfully liberated from invasive mechanical ventilation
Time frame: From randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive)
The number of days from randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive) during which the patient is alive and successfully discontinued from vasopressor therapy
Time frame: From randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive)
The number of days from randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive) during which the patient is alive and does not require renal replacement therapy
Time frame: From randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive)
The proportion of participants who die from any cause between randomization (day 0) and day 28 (inclusive)
Time frame: Time Frame: From randomization (day 0) up to hospital discharge, assessed up to 90 days
The proportion of participants who die from any cause between randomization (day 0) and hospital discharge (inclusive). If a patient remains hospitalized for more than 90 days, 90-day mortality will be used as in-hospital mortality
Time frame: From randomization (day 0) to 6 months (inclusive)
The proportion of participants who die from any cause between randomization (day 0) and 6 months (inclusive)
Time frame: From randomization(day 0) to 12 months
The proportion of participants who die from any cause between randomization (day 0) and 12 months
Time frame: From randomization (day 0) to day 90 (inclusive)
The number of days from randomization (day 0) to day 90 (inclusive) during which the patient is alive and does not require hospitalization
Time frame: Time Frame: From randomization (day 0) up to hospital discharge, assessed up to 90 days
The proportion of participants in whom active treatment is withheld or withdrawn between randomization (day 0) and hospital discharge (inclusive)
Time frame: 90 days, 6 months and 12 months after randomization
Cognitive status was assessed using a Chinese modified version of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified (TICS-m). Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance
Time frame: 90 days, 6 months and 12 months after randomization
Psychological outcomes will be assessed with the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C, Chinese version). Respondents indicate how much they have been bothered by a symptom over the past month using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating more severe levels of PTSD.
Time frame: 90 days, 6 months and 12 months after randomization
Health-related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) instrument at 90 days, 6months and 12 months after randomization. The EQ-5D-5L measures health across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Time frame: 90 days, 6 months, 12 months after randomization
Caregiver-reported outcome, higher scores indicating worse impairment.
Time frame: 90 days, 6 months, 12 months after randomization
Assessed using the Barthel Index, including feeding, bathing, grooming, dressing, bowel control, bladder control, toileting, chair/bed transfer, ambulation, and stair climbing, higher scores indicate greater independence.
Time frame: From randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive)
For intubated patients, successful weaning was defined as survival without reintubation within 7 days after extubation, or liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation with ICU discharge within 7 days.
For tracheostomized patients, successful weaning was defined as spontaneous breathing via tracheostomy without mechanical ventilation for at least 7 consecutive days, or liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation with ICU discharge within 7 days.
Reintubation for diagnostic purposes (e.g., bronchoscopy) or planned surgical procedures (e.g., wound debridement, abdominal lavage, internal fixation of fractures, tracheostomy) was not considered weaning failure.
Time frame: From randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive)
The proportion of participants who developed acute gastrointestinal bleeding requiring transfusion of more than 1 unit of packed red blood cells within 24 hours
Time frame: From randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive)
The proportion of participants who developed secondary bloodstream infection through day 28
Time frame: From randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive)
The proportion of participants who developed ventilator-associated pneumonia through day 28
Time frame: From randomization (day 0) to day 28 (inclusive)
The proportion of participants who had hyperglycemia events (blood glucose level >180 mg/dl) through day 28
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Southeast University, China
Other
Acronym: DEFEND
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07025096
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Infections
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07369206
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Acute Respiratory Failure
Erzurum, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06726473
Acid-Base Balance Disorder, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07629973
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Lung Diseases
View Trial Details