Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04513899

Development of a Community-based HCV Treatment Completion Intervention Among HCV Positive Homeless Adults

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will test the efficacy of a Community Health Worker/Registered Nurse (CHW-RN) HCV intervention for homeless individuals, many who are also drug users. The intervention will be designed during Phase I of the proposal using an iterative process between a Community Advisory Board (CAB) and focus groups. The CHW/RN intervention will occur over a 2 or 3 month (8-12 weeks) period depending on the Direct-Acting Antiviral (DAA) prescribed. Homeless adults assigned to the CHW/RN HCV treatment group will receive culturally-sensitive education, case management, and daily DOT delivery of DAA by an RN-guided CHW. The CHW will run a brief (20 min) weekly 1:1 education and 20 min case management session over the 8 or 12 weeks and will deliver all components of the program (which will be developed and refined during Phase I). The CHW-RN HCV intervention will be compared to a clinic-based standard of care group (cbSOC). Primary outcomes are the completion of the Direct-Acting Agent (DAA) treatment (month 2 or 3) and SVR12 Cure (month 5 or 6). Secondary outcomes are improved mental health status, decrease in substance use, and improved access to health care, and shelter stability at month 5 or 6.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Amity Foundation, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

HCV infection disproportionately affects homeless and drug-using populations and represents a critical focus for effective HCV prevention at the individual and community level. Homeless persons have a 26 fold increase in HCV prevalence compared to the general population; particularly with injection drug use (IDU). In fact, 50-80% of HCV infection is among persons who inject drugs (PWID). Among homeless populations, risk factors for HCV include older age, IDU, needle sharing, previous incarceration, veteran status, fair-or-poor health status, and sharing toothbrushes. Among the 48% of HCV-infected homeless persons who did not inject drugs, correlates of HCV infection include older age, less education, use of drugs, and history of multiple tattoos. While HCV treatment for PWID can reduce HCV prevalence, despite recommended guidelines, only 1-6% of drug-using HCV-infected persons have received treatment. Among the homeless adults, factors associated with low HCV treatment completion include untreated mental illness, current substance use, unstable housing, and limited access to care. Although the new Direct Acting Agent (DAA) are costly, cure rates have risen to above 98%. Yet limited research has been conducted on DAA agents among drug-using homeless adults. Extending HCV treatment beyond the traditional tertiary care model and involving peer supports can facilitate access to HCV treatment. The scientific premise of this proposal is that homeless HCV positive adults often do not obtain/complete HCV treatment due to significant psychosocial barriers. Thus, developing and testing a strategy that combines treatment with psychosocial support would be expected to change this outcome. To our knowledge, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has yet assessed the efficacy of a comprehensive community-based model that incorporates HCV and substance use treatment to address HCV among homeless persons, despite the critical need that exists. The proposed treatment concept - Community Health Worker/Registered Nurse (CHW-RN) - is innovative and helps HCV treatment reach beyond the clinic walls, directly into the community where the homeless reside, reducing barriers to treatment. Guided by our community-based model, the CHW/RN intervention will focus on improving social support, coping skills, problem-solving, self-management, physical and mental health, substance use, and stable housing.

The proposed study will contribute to our knowledge about culturally-sensitive strategies for HCV treatment among homeless adults, many of whom use drugs and alcohol. It will address a substantial health disparity in a historically underserved population, with broader implications for public health. While DAAs have not been assessed among homeless adults using RCTs, homeless persons who are active drug users, in particular, have had challenges with uptake and compliance of other HCV treatments. To our knowledge, no study has evaluated the effect of a CHW/RN HCV treatment program, delivered in the community where the participant lives, compared to a cbSOC model to assess HCV treatment completion and Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) after 12 weeks of treatment completion. For further innovation, we will now evaluate the extent to which the pathways posed by the CHSCP and similar models, including the BMVP affect health outcomes by adding to Aim 3 analyses an examination of mechanisms of therapeutic change by the mediating effects of improved psychosocial and structural factors (e.g. housing, social support, etc ) on improved rates of SVR12. Improved understanding of the mechanisms of effect will advance the understanding of these factors and their role in determining health outcomes. The proposed study will pretest an RN-guided, CHW-delivered, program wherein a CHW/RN program will be developed and pretested with the community through focus group methodology. The intervention will focus on improving the completion of HCV treatment, reducing drug and alcohol use, reducing mental illness, and improving housing stability. The findings of this study can lay the groundwork for a subsequent larger trial to test the efficacy of the developed CHW/RN program more broadly and may inform health policy that could encourage enrollment of this high-risk group into HCV treatment. Results may also inform future cost-effective, community-based interventions that could be scaled-up and disseminated more broadly. Employing a treatment-as-prevention focus of HCV transmission in the community is urgent since HCV among the homeless represents a reservoir for HCV infection in the general population.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • currently homeless. A homeless person is defined as anyone who spent the previous night in a public or private shelter, a place not meant for sleeping (van, car, public facility, abandoned building) or in outdoor areas.
  • age 18 or older;
  • willing and able to provide informed consent;
  • able to complete the screener;
  • willing to have blood tests to be screened for HCV and tested HCV antibody positive;
  • APRI ≤ 0.7, no signs of advanced cirrhosis (jaundice, ascites, encephalopathy) and willing to undergo the abdominal US as the standard of care (at the clinic).
  • history of substance use (past 5 years).

Exclusion criteria

  • current ongoing treatment for HCV;
  • current HBV infection;
  • HIV infection and not receiving medications for HIV treatment;
  • not speaking English or Spanish; and
  • testing pregnant; and
  • judged to be cognitively impaired

Treatment and study plan

Community health worker (CHW)/ registered nurse (RN) [CHW/RN]

Behavioral

A team of 2-3 CHWs and a research RN will deliver all components of the program including daily DOT delivery of Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA) and assess HCV side effects all under the guidance of their RN. Recruitment will be continuous: each CHW may be assigned up to 7-8 participants every 2-3 months until the target sample size (n=54 for the intervention group) is achieved. After the first dose of the DAA, the CHW will run a brief weekly 1:1 education and case management session over the 8 or 12 weeks (total 20 minutes). The CHW/RN team will assist the participant in picking up the monthly medication and storing the medication in a secure, locked cabinet at the research office. The CHW will rigorously track participants who have missed a dose, and will also be involved in facilitating medical, mental health, substance use, social service, legal appointments for participants, housing referrals, and accompany the participants to the appointments.

Clinic-based Standard of Care (cbSOC) Program (control group)

Behavioral

This program will be delivered by a clinic-based MD or clinic-based NP at the clinic site. Evaluation Staff (ES) will be hired and trained to do the interviewing/survey administration and follow-ups at the clinic-based site. The clinic NP will conduct, per usual care at the study clinics, the education and monitoring of these participants who will interact with the clinic-based-MD and/or NP monthly over the 8 or 12-week program. Usual care will include: 1) HCV pre-treatment education; 2) two month supply of DAA; 3) monitoring adverse events; and 4) responding to questions on HCV. Referral to drug/alcohol and housing programs will be provided over the standard of care. The cbSOC participants will not receive the community delivery of the DAA, or case management, or accompaniment to needed services. The cbSOC Program will receive the medication on a monthly basis from the clinic MD or NP.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Completing HCV Treatment

    Time frame: 2-3 months depending on which DAA drug was provided. Some required 2 months and others, 3 months.

    The number of participants completing HCV treatment (7 days per week x 2- or 3 month treatment of DAA) was measured by pill count to measure adherence in both groups. For the RN/CHW group, directly observed therapy was utilized where the CHW or RN delivered the medication daily and documented each time s/he observed the participant swallow a pill.

    For the cbSOC Program (control group), the clinic-based MD/NP conducted a pill count monthly, based on the medications left in the pill bottle each month the participant is scheduled to pick up the next supply

  2. Number of Participants Attaining SVR12 (Sustained Viral Response at 12 Weeks After Treatment Completion)

    Time frame: 5 or 6 months

    The number of participants who attained SVR12 Cure (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml, detectable or undetectable) as tested at 5 or 6-month follow-up (12 weeks after treatment completion)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Drug Use

    Time frame: 2 or 3- and 5 or 6-month follow-up

    Assessed by drug items in the Texas Christian University (TCU) Screen V. Yes/No responses to substance dependency questions and the frequency of drug use based on a 5-point scale from 1 (never) to 5 (daily) was assessed for each drug used. The range of scores on the 11-item Yes/no questions analyzed ranged from ranges from 0 - 11; corresponding to the number of symptoms endorsed by the participant and the severity of SUD: Mild disorder (2-3 points), moderate disorder (4-5 points), or severe disorder (6 or more points). The total score was calculated by adding the scores for all questions and averaging for all the participants at each follow-up time point. Drug Use was assessed at "2 or 3" months and "5 or 6" months follow-up.

  2. Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Concise (AUDIT-C)

    Time frame: Assessment at 2 or 3- and 5 or 6-month follow-up

    Assessed by a brief alcohol screening instrument The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Concise (AUDIT-C). AUDIT-C reliably identifies persons who are hazardous drinkers or have active alcohol use disorders (including alcohol abuse or dependence). The AUDIT-C has 3 questions and is scored on a scale of 0-12. Each AUDIT-C question has 5 answer choices valued from 0 points to 4 points. The higher the score the more severe is the alcohol disorder. The total score was calculated by adding the scores for all questions and averaging for all the participants at each follow-up time point Based on the duration of DAA prescribed for the HCV treatment, the follow-up period was at "2 or 3" months and "5 or 6" months.

  3. CAGE Substance Abuse Screening Scale

    Time frame: 2 or 3- and 5 or 6-month follow-up

    Assessed by CAGE an internationally used assessment instrument for identifying alcoholics. Item responses on the CAGE are scored 0 or 1. The total score was calculated by adding up the scores for all four questions and averaging for all the participants for each time point. A total score of 2 or greater is considered clinically significant and may indicate alcohol-related issues.

    Based on the duration of DAA prescribed for the HCV treatment, the follow-up period was at "2 or 3" months and "5 or 6" months.

  4. Depression

    Time frame: 2 or 3- and 5 or 6-month follow-up

    Mental Health will be assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 is a self-administered depression module of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ). It contains 9 questions that help identify patients with clinically meaningful symptoms of depression. Patient responses are scored 0-3 with 0 representing "not at all" and 3 indicating "nearly every day;" thus, the PHQ-9 contains a total score range of 0-27. The total score was calculated by adding the scores for all questions and averaging for all the participants at each follow-up time point. The higher the score, the more severe is the alcohol disorder.

    Based on the duration of DAA prescribed for the HCV treatment, the follow-up period was at "2 or 3" months and "5 or 6" months.

  5. Mental Health

    Time frame: 2 or 3- and 5 or 6-month follow-up

    Mental Health was assessed by the Mental Health Inventory (MHI)-5; well-demonstrated reliability for detecting psychological disorders. The MHI-5 comprises five questions. There are six possible responses to the questions, scored between 1 and 6. The score for each individual therefore ranges between 5 and 30. This is then transformed into a variable ranging from 0-100 using a standard linear transformation. The higher the score, the better the perception of mental health.

    Based on the duration of DAA prescribed for the HCV treatment, the follow-up period was at "2 or 3" months and "5 or 6" months.

  6. Health Care Access

    Time frame: 2 or 3- and 5 or 6-month follow-up

    Health Care Access will include number of participants who completed 2 or more visits for health care or social services during the 2-3 month and 5-6 month follow-up

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of California, Irvine

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
  • University of California, Los Angeles

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Aug 14, 2020
Registry last updated
Mar 1, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.