Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05758506

Developing a Screening Tool for Primary Immunodeficiency Disease (PID) in Pakistan

Case-control diagnostic accuracy study with 130 potential pediatric PID+ (primary immunodeficiency) patients, and 100 age-matched, healthy controls (PID-). The potential PID+ participants will be recruited prospectively through 9 hospitals in Sindh and Punjab states or contacted via the PID surveillance registry developed by AKU Hospital's Polio Excretion in PID study to identify children with primary antibody deficiency (PAD+: a type of PID+); healthy, age-matched PID-participants will be recruited by snowball sampling. At the point of care, health care workers (HCWs) will collect capillary blood samples (0.1mL) to run the PID rapid screening test and reader on potential PID+ participants (identified by exhibiting >2 of the Jeffrey Modell warning signs) and healthy, age-matched controls. All pediatric study participants will be sent to the hospital lab to have a confirmatory immunology panel (see 4.4.1 Diagnosing PID for the battery of tests) run on a serum/plasma sample to confirm their PID diagnosis (PID+/PAD-, PID+/PAD+, PID-); a 1.5uL aliquot of serum/plasma will simultaneously be used to run a PID rapid screening test by a laboratory technician (LT). HCWs and LTs will be blinded to true PID status. Blood and serum PID rapid screening test results will be compared to the confirmatory immunology panel to determine diagnostic accuracy. All clinical management of study participants will follow the standard of care for PID in Pakistan and will be based upon the immunology panel result. The HCWs and LTs administering the tests will be trained prior to the diagnostic accuracy test (see Objectives below) and will provide feedback on the tool post-training and post-use to assess usability, acceptability, and feasibility of integrating the test and digital reader into tertiary hospitals for the purpose of improved national PID surveillance, improved PID patient care, and polio eradication in Pakistan.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

3 month–15 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Aga Khan University Hospital

Karachi, Pakistan

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 3 months to 15 years
  • Presents for care at 1 of 9tertiary hospitals participating in the study
  • Potential PID+ (Case): Child is identified by HCW to have >2 Jeffrey Model warning signs of PID. [Note: Upon immunology panel testing, this group will be separated into three categories: PID-, PID+, and PID+/PAD+ meaning they have 1 of 5 relevant primary antibody deficiencies (PAD+)].
  • PID-(Control): Child is identified (by snowball sampling) as being in good health, and having the same age (within 12 months) as another child who produced a PID+ result.
  • Caregiver consents to participate in the study and provides informed consent. If their children are 10 years of age or older, that child must also give assent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Aged less than 3 months or greater than 15 years of age
  • Caregiver does not consent to participate, or child >10years does not give assent to participate.
  • Having received IVIG in the past 90 days

Treatment and study plan

Primary Immunodeficiency (PID) Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT)

Device

We are evaluating the accuracy of a new rapid diagnostic screening test. There is no medical intervention with the participants in this study.

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic accuracy

    Time frame: 8 month

    Estimates of diagnostic accuracy characteristics with 95% confidence intervals (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) of the PID screening test for relevant PIDs in a Pakistani population of both PID+ children and PID- age-matched healthy controls

  2. Determine usability, acceptability, feasibility of integrating PID test and digital reader into tertiary hospitals for improved patient care

    Time frame: 8 months

    Estimates of user effectiveness, efficacy, satisfaction, learnability, and feasibility among trained health care workers (HCWs) and laboratory technicians (LTs) will be evaluated using observation checklists and surveys. The observation checklist will evaluate the ability to administer the test, read the test results accurately after the appropriate amount of waiting time, record the result in the digital reader app, operate the digital app to read a photograph of the test result, and their ease of performing these tasks. This methodology adheres to ISO 9241-210 on human-centered design principles in usability testing.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness - agreement between the PID screening test readouts (#1, #2) with each other, the digital reading, a PATH expert panel, and the local PID standard of care immunology tests.

    Time frame: 8 months

    Percent (%) agreement between each of the PID screening test results, digital app result, expert panel, and immunology panel.

  2. Effectiveness

    Time frame: 8 months

    Percent (%) agreement in PID screening test results between capillary whole blood samples and serum samples.

  3. Understandability of diagnostic instruction

    Time frame: 8 months

    Percent of trained end users who can accurately comprehend the material presented in the training course curriculum and the IFU.

  4. Usability of screening test result outputs

    Time frame: 8 months

    Percent of trained end users who can accurately interpret the investigational device result output.

  5. Usability for facilitators

    Time frame: 8 months

    Percent of stakeholders who would use the test, lists of barriers and facilitators cited for Pakistani context.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

PATH

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Mar 7, 2023
Registry last updated
Jul 31, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.