University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
NCT Number: NCT05168579
The objective of this study is to test the feasibility of using deliberate practice - goal-oriented training in the presence of a coach who can provide personalized, immediate feedback - to increase engagement. The research design involves recruitment of a national convenience sample of board-certified emergency physicians who will serve as trainees (n=30), pairing of the trainees with a coach, delivery of three 30-minute coaching sessions using the existing games as the training task, and assessment of the effect of the combined intervention on performance in the laboratory. The specific aims are:
1. To assess the fidelity of intervention delivery by measuring coaching skill acquisition, coaching skill drift and protocol adherence. 2. To assess the potential effect size of the intervention by comparing trainee performance on a validated virtual simulation with a control group of physicians (n=30). 3. To assess the acceptability of the intervention by using a mixture of validated instruments and semi-structured debriefing interviews with trainees to assess their engagement with the intervention.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me25 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Deliberate practice - goal-oriented training in the presence of a coach who can provide personalized, immediate feedback - has successfully improved performance across multiple domains, including sports, music, and combat. When used in conjunction with simulation to improve surgical skill, it has a large effect on educational outcomes. It has characteristics that make its application in this context potentially powerful (e.g. personalized feedback/relationship with coach increase engagement) but also potentially challenging (e.g. the diagnostic process does not lend itself easily to assessment). The objective of this study is to test the feasibility of using deliberate practice to amplify the effect of a video game intervention. The team will recruit a national sample of board-certified emergency physicians (n=30) to serve as trainees, with members of the team (n=3) serving as coaches. Trainee-coach dyads will meet for 30 minutes/week for 3 weeks, by video-conferencing, to play one of the existing video games and to use it to practice pattern recognition. Aims are:
This proposal will inform a future Stage III trial to compare the effect of different interventions on diagnostic error in trauma triage. If successful, this program of research will have an impact on patients by reducing the burden imposed by injury and by addressing the refractory problem of diagnostic error. It is novel conceptually in its effort to make heuristics a source of power, methodologically in its use of deliberate practice to improve diagnosis, and translationally in its use of video game technology. It is feasible because the investigative team has clinical and behavioral science expertise, experience developing deliberate practice interventions, and a track record of successfully building video games that can transform physician behavior. It responds to two national research priorities: 1) improving the diagnostic process; 2) maintaining health and independent living among the aging.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Board certified physicians who work at non-trauma centers in the United States
Exclusion criteria
Physicians without board certification (i.e., residents). Physicians who work only at trauma centers in the US.
As above
Time frame: 3 week intervention period
A summary of the number of trainees who signed up for coaching sessions and completed all three sessions as assigned.
Time frame: 3 weeks post-intervention (deliberate practice) or 3 weeks post-enrollment (control)
Proportion of severely injured patients NOT transferred to trauma centers/total number of severely injured patients evaluated during a validated virtual simulation
Time frame: 2- weeks post intervention
Derived from semi-structured interviews conducted by members of the investigative team at the conclusion of the 3 week training period. These interviews will focus on participant perceptions of the acceptability of the intervention.
University of Pittsburgh
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06304909
Accidental Injuries, Trauma Injury
Asyut, Assiut Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07643051
Accidental Injuries, Fall
View Trial DetailsNCT04925531
Accidental Injuries, Trauma Injury
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06063434
Accidental Injuries, Physician's Role
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details