Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07201012

Determining the Prevalence of Muir-Torre Syndrome in Patients With Lynch Syndrome

The main aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of Muir-Torre syndrome (MTS) in the population of patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) confirmed by genetic analysis. Other aims include describing the dermatological clinical manifestations of these patients in order to describe any possible new cutaneous manifestations of this syndrome. Another aim is to use molecular biology (microsatellite instability) and immunohistochemistry to analyze non-sebaceous skin lesions and deep-seated tumors that do not belong to the narrow spectrum of Lynch syndrome, and determine whether their occurrence in these patients is related to the genetic syndrome. The follow-up of these tumors (screening for new tumors) in patients with SL, as recommended by the learned societies, will also be evaluated. Finally, a biobank of cutaneous and deep tumour lesions in paraffin (retrospective) and smears of cutaneous lesions and healthy tissue (prospective) will be set up.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

About this study

Muir-Torre Syndrome (MTS) is an autosomal dominant disease described independently by Muir et al. in 1967 and Torre in 1968, defined by the association of a visceral tumor of the Lynch spectrum (colorectal, endometrial, urinary excretory tract, biliary tract, small intestine, stomach or glioblastoma carcinomas) and sebaceous skin tumors and/or multiple keratoacanthomas.

Histo-molecular examination of tumors for TMS/SL is based on 2 techniques, each focusing on a different aspect of TMS pathophysiology.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies the presence of proteins from the MisMatch Repair (MMR) system in lesional tissues, and an absence of expression of one of these proteins is the physical translation of an abnormality in the MMR pathway, for which the presence of a constitutional mutation in one of the MMR system genes (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6) is responsible. An IHC-deficient MMR phenotype (dMMR) results in a complete loss of expression of one or more MMR proteins in tumor cells, with expression maintained in "normal" cells (connective cells, immune cells, non-tumor epithelial cells).

Molecular biology or microsatellite instability (MSI) testing focuses on the molecular repercussions of MMR pathway failure. The aim of this technique is to determine the presence of microsatellite marker instability in tumor tissue. While for colorectal tumors, a comparative analysis of the patient's healthy tissue can be dispensed with, for other organs on the Lynch spectrum, including sebaceous tumors, a comparison with DNA from normal tissue can help interpret the results.

The incidence of TMS among patients with genetically proven SL is poorly known. Two studies have shown a prevalence of 9.2%, both involving American patients (1,2). These were 2 retrospective chart-based studies, the skin tumors not having been re-read for diagnostic confirmation.

These patients may also develop skin tumors not belonging to the SMT-SL spectrum, such as basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) or melanocytic tumors (melanomas and nevi). These skin and deep tumors (visceral tumors) not belonging to the Lynch spectrum of patients with proven SL have rarely been systematically studied for a dMMR phenotype.

French societies (INCa, Société Française de Gastroentérologie) have proposed the management of any patient with a mutation in one of the MMR system genes. Compliance with follow-up is a major public health issue. Digestive follow-up (regular colonoscopies) is only 68%, whereas gynecological follow-up is only 73% to 80%. Other types of follow-up, notably dermatological, have rarely been analyzed, and above all we have no data on compliance in France.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient with a germline alteration of one of the MMR (MisMatch Repair) pathway genes (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6) proven by constitutional genetic analysis (genetically authenticated Lynch syndrome).
  • Patient followed at Nîmes University Hospital.
  • Patient having given free and informed consent.
  • Person affiliated to or benefiting from a social security scheme.

Exclusion criteria

  • Person under court protection, guardianship or curatorship.
  • A person who is unable to give consent.
  • Person for whom it is impossible to give informed information.

Treatment and study plan

Sampling of suspected skin lesions (in accordance with good care practices).

Diagnostic Test

Sampling of suspected skin lesions (in accordance with good care practices) and swabbing of skin microbiota.

Constitution of a biobank

Genetic

Collection of previously excised cutaneous and deep tumour lesions kept in a public or private pathological anatomy facility for these patients

Primary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of Muir-Torre syndrome (MTS) in the population of patients with Lynch syndrome

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after inclusion

    Proportion of patients with Muir-Torre Syndrome confirmed by the occurrence of a sebaceous tumor (sebaceous adenoma, sebaceoma, sebaceous carcinoma) or several keratoacanthomas among patients with Lynch Syndrome. These tumors may or may not have had the mismatch repair system analyzed by immunohistochemistry (analysis of the 4 antibodies MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6) or by molecular biology (search for microsatellite instability).

    If the mismatch repair system has been studied, it must be deficient and the proteins absent on immunohistochemistry must be consistent with the mutated gene in Lynch Syndrome. If a block or slides are still available, sebaceous skin tumors or keratoacanthomas will be re-evaluated at Nîmes University Hospital for confirmation of the diagnosis.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dermatological clinical manifestations in patients with confirmed Lynch Syndrome

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after inclusion

    Presence of clinical dermatological signs associated with Lynch syndrome. YES/NO

  2. Non-sebaceous skin lesions and Deep-seated tumors not belonging to the narrow spectrum of Lynch syndrome. Presence of antibody MLH1

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after inclusion

    Molecular analysis (MSI test) and immunohistochemical analysis. Presence of antibody MLH1 on other tumour tissues (YES/NO) to determine the mismatch repair deficient (or MSI = pathological) or proficient (or MSS = normal) status of these lesions (and thereby their link with Muir-Torre syndrome).

  3. Non-sebaceous skin lesions and Deep-seated tumors not belonging to the narrow spectrum of Lynch syndrome. Presence of antibody PMS2

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after inclusion

    Molecular analysis (MSI test) and immunohistochemical analysis. Presence of antibody PMS2 on other tumour tissues (YES/NO) to determine the mismatch repair deficient (or MSI = pathological) or proficient (or MSS = normal) status of these lesions (and thereby their link with Muir-Torre syndrome).

  4. Non-sebaceous skin lesions and Deep-seated tumors not belonging to the narrow spectrum of Lynch syndrome. Presence of antibody MSH2

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after inclusion

    Molecular analysis (MSI test) and immunohistochemical analysis. Presence of antibody MSH2 on other tumour tissues (YES/NO) to determine the mismatch repair deficient (or MSI = pathological) or proficient (or MSS = normal) status of these lesions (and thereby their link with Muir-Torre syndrome).

  5. Non-sebaceous skin lesions and Deep-seated tumors not belonging to the narrow spectrum of Lynch syndrome. Presence of antibody MSH6

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after inclusion

    Molecular analysis (MSI test) and immunohistochemical analysis. Presence of antibody MSH6 (YES/NO) on other tumour tissues, to determine the mismatch repair deficient (or MSI = pathological) or proficient (or MSS = normal) status of these lesions (and thereby their link with Muir-Torre syndrome).

Other outcomes

  1. Constitution of a biobank

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after inclusion

    Collection of previously excised cutaneous and deep tumour lesions kept in a public or private pathological anatomy facility for these patients

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Anissa MEZGARI

CONTACT

[email protected]

+44466684236

Eric FROUIN, Dr.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+334 66 68 82 74

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Other

Registry information

Acronym: SMT-SL

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Oct 1, 2025
Registry last updated
Jun 22, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.