Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05022017

Description of Statics by EOS Imaging and Evaluation of the Efficacy of Intradiscal Corticosteroid Infiltration

Inflammatory disc disease or Modic 1 disc disease is a radiological entity first described by Modic in 1988 and corresponds to an inflammatory signal on MRI defined by the presence of a T2-weighted hypersignal and a T1-weighted hyposignal of the vertebral endplates adjacent to a pathological disc.

The presence of these radiological abnormalities are significantly associated with chronic low back pain, the therapeutic management of which may include lumbar rehabilitation, rigid corset, spinal infiltrations and surgical treatment. Corticosteroid infiltration of the pathological intervertebral disc (intradiscal infiltration) has been evaluated in low back pain due to Modic 1 disc disease with short-term efficacy. The clinical response to this infiltration is not always optimal and to date in the literature, no predictive factor of response has been identified.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75014, France

About this study

There are several hypotheses to explain this phenomenon: mechanical, genetic, infectious or inflammatory. One of the mechanical hypotheses would be the presence of an instability of the spinal segment (hypermobility of the spinal segment) and disorders of the sagittal statics of the spine with angles of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis weak and a weak sacral slope supporting a hyperpressure passing by the discs and the genesis of discopathy.

In this work, the investigators will evaluate the different parameters of the spinal statics in the sagittal plane and in the frontal plane (sacral slope, pelvic version, Roussouly classification, cobb angle...) by EOS imaging as well as the parameters of the Modic 1 anomaly on lumbar MRI (spinal stage, Pfirmann classification, laterality of the inflammatory signal) in a population of patients who received intradiscal corticosteroid infiltration for low back pain in the context of Modic 1 disc disease.

The analysis of the different radiological parameters could enrich the investigator's understanding of the pathophysiology and evaluate radiological factors predictive of the effectiveness of intradiscal infiltration in this population. This could allow us to adapt the management of low back pain patients with Modic 1 disc disease.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient whose age ≥ 18 years
  • French speaking patient
  • Patient hospitalized in the rheumatology department of GHPSJ between 01/01/2014 and 31/12/2020 for MODIC 1
  • Patients who received as part of their management an intra-disc infiltration with hydrocortancyl.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient under guardianship or curators
  • Patient deprived of liberty
  • Patient under court protection
  • Patient objecting to the use of his data for this research
  • Patient having benefited from another infiltration between the intradiscal infiltration and the collection of efficacy data at 3 months.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the effectiveness of the intra-disc infiltration at 3 months on the pain felt by the patient.

    Time frame: 3 months

    Percentage of patients with improved low back pain defined as a decrease in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain >3 at 3 months after intradiscal infiltration compared to VAS at admission.

    VAS scale : minimum score 0 (no pain) / higher score 10 (greater pain intensity)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in analgesic consumption (Level 1, Level 2, Level 3 and NSAIDs) at 3 months.

    Time frame: 3 months

    Consumption of level 1, 2 or 3 painkillers and NSAIDs in the previous week (number of doses per day and per week).

  2. Describe the parameters of spinal statics in the frontal planes in Modic 1 disc disease.

    Time frame: 3 months

    Distribution of the values of the parameters of the spinal statics in the sagittal plane (sacral slope, pelvic incidence, pelvic version, lumbar lordosis, Roussouly classification) and in the frontal plane (cobb angle).

  3. Compare the parameters of spinal statics according to the different stages of Modic 1 disc disease

    Time frame: 3 months

    Distribution of the values of spinal statics parameters in the sagittal plane (sacral slope, pelvic incidence, pelvic version, lumbar lordosis, Roussouly classification) and in the frontal plane (cobb angle) according to the presence of low lumbar (L4L5 L5S1) or high lumbar (L1L2 L2L3 L3L4) disc disease.

  4. Predictive factors (clinical and radiological) of the effectiveness of intra-disc infiltration

    Time frame: 3 months

    Correlation between pain improvement 3 months after infiltration and the type of disc disease (cobb scoliosis > 10°) as well as the parameters of spinal statics in the sagittal and frontal planes and the type of disc damage according to the Pfirmann classification

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph

Other

Registry information

Official study title

EOS MODIC : Inflammatory Disc Disease: Description of Statics by EOS Imaging and Evaluation of the Efficacy of Intradiscal Corticosteroid Infiltration

Acronym: EOSMODIC

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2023
First posted
Aug 26, 2021
Registry last updated
Apr 27, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.