Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03651518

Personalized Therapies in Inflammatory Complex Disease

Inflammatory diseases may display atypical features making such patients impossible to classify. Management of these cases in daily practice cannot rely on the results of clinical trials nor on guidelines. DNA and RNA mapping have become major tools to understand and sometimes direct the treatment strategy in oncology. This study aims to test whether a precise analysis of molecular pathways in inflammatory, non classified diseases, can constitute a predictive tool of therapeutic efficiency

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Hôpital Cochin

Paris, 75014, France

About this study

This is a phase IIb study. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of targeted treatments in patients displaying a non-classified, severe and resistant inflammatory disease. Targeted treatments for each patient will have been selected through an algorithm based on molecular analysis of specific altered inflammatory signaling pathway.

Treatments consist in targeted therapies approved in other indications (Kineret®, Humira®, Stelara®, Cosentyx®, Roactemra® and Rituximab®) that will be given once selected using molecular analysis and decision making procedure by the Scientific committee.

For each patient, one targeted treatment will be administered according to the SmPC procedure for a treatment period of 6 months.

Primary efficacy endpoint:

Response will be assessed at month 6 with a composite endpoint defined as improvement of at least 2 of the 3 following parameters:

  • 50% improvement of the systemic activity assessed by the clinician following a visual analog scale (0-10 mm),
  • and/or 50% improvement of cutaneous activity assessed by the involved skin surface area,
  • and/or 50% decrease or normalisation of biological markers of inflammation (either CRP, ESR or fibrin).

An independent adjudication committee blinded to the treatment received, will review primary endpoint for all patients based on clinical files and standardized photographs, to validate the response.

Other secondary criteria will be assessed. Overall, this study will require a molecular analysis done on patient's tissue, the final aim being to evaluate efficiency and tolerance of targeted treatments chosen in a personalized analysis when classification is impossible.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients (men or women) aged 18 years old and over
  • Patients presenting inflammatory non classified disease targeting at least 2 organs involvement: skin, lymph nodes, hemopoietic system, joints, digestive tract, eye, nerves and brain tissues, respiratory tract, cardio-vascular disorders, genito-urinary tract including kidney, musculo-skeletal tissues. Skin involvement is mandatory in order to be able to compare involved and non-involved tissue
  • Signed informed consent

The disease should be considered as non-classified despite classical and adapted investigations and evaluation through expert committee meeting.

The disease alters significantly quality of life. The impairment of quality of life will be assessed based on the investigator's assessment.

The disease has been resistant to at least two prior lines of treatment [for example : Hydroxychloroquine, Chloroquine, Colchicine, Methotrexate, Ciclosporine, Azathioprine, Mycophenolate mofetil, Disulone, Corticosteroids (prednisone, prednisolone, dexamethasone, methylprednisolone…)].

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients presenting disease which is not featured by lesional and healthy skin areas, easy to biopsy
  • Patients refusing biopsies
  • Pregnancy
  • Women of child-bearing potential unable to receive highly efficient contraception such as combined oral contraceptives, intra-uterine disposals, hormonal implants or the use of male condoms recommended in case of unstable or irregular partner or as a replacement method for transient unacessebility to hormonal method
  • Breastfeeding
  • Patients presenting disease needing urgent therapeutic measures
  • Patients without health insurance or social security
  • Participation in another interventional trial
  • Patients under legal protection
  • Patients unable to respect the wash out delay of previously taken medications before biopsy and before treatment initiation :
  • Hydroxychloroquine (wash out period = 30 days)
  • Chloroquine (wash out period = 7 days)
  • Colchicine (wash out period = 7 days)
  • Methotrexate (wash out period = 7 days)
  • Ciclosporine (wash out period = 14 days)
  • Azathioprine (wash out period = 14 days)
  • Mycophenolate mofetil (wash out period = 14 days)
  • Disulone (wash out period = 7 days)
  • Corticosteroids (=prednisone, prednisolone, dexamethasone, methylprednisolone) (wash out period = 7 days for doses greater than 5mg)
  • Patients with contra-indications to treatments : Severe or active infections including tuberculosis

Treatment and study plan

Kineret

Drug

100 mg, once/day sc 6 months

humira

Drug

40 mg/15 days sc 6 months

Stelara

Drug

45 mg/12 weeks sc, 6 months

Cosentyx

Drug

300mg sc every week for 1 month, then 300 mg/month sc for 5 months

Roactemra

Drug

480 mg/perf/4 weeks 6 months

Rituximab

Drug

2 sessions of 1000 mg at inclusion and 15 days after inclusion

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite clinico-biological evaluation

    Time frame: 6 months

    Response will be assessed at month 6 with a composite endpoint defined as improvement of at least of 2 of the 3 following parameters:

    • 50% improvement of the systemic activity assessed by the clinician following a visual analog scale (0-10), where clinician will be asked the following question: "Please indicate, according to your clinical experience and taking into account all systemic manifestations, the level of disease activity in this patient using the following scale:"
    • and/or 50% improvement of cutaneous activity assessed by the involved skin surface area (according the rule of 9%). Standardised skin pictures will be done in order to centrally review cutaneous response.
    • and/or 50% decrease or normalisation of biological markers of inflammation (either CRP, ESR or fibrin)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Infections

    Time frame: 12 months

    to evaluate tolerance

  2. liver cell count toxicities

    Time frame: 12 months

    to evaluate tolerance

  3. kidney cell count toxicities

    Time frame: 12 months

    to evaluate tolerance

  4. blood cell count toxicities

    Time frame: 12 months

    to evaluate tolerance

  5. Change in Physician Global Assessment (PGA)

    Time frame: 1 month,

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  6. Change in Physician Global Assessment (PGA)

    Time frame: 3 months,

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  7. Change in Physician Global Assessment (PGA)

    Time frame: 6 months,

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  8. Change in continuous PGA

    Time frame: 9 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  9. Change in continuous PGA

    Time frame: 12 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  10. Change in British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)

    Time frame: 3 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  11. Change in British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)

    Time frame: 6 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  12. Change in British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)

    Time frame: 9 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  13. Change in British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)

    Time frame: 12 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  14. Change in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI)

    Time frame: 3 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  15. Change in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI)

    Time frame: 6 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  16. Change in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI)

    Time frame: 9 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  17. Change in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI)

    Time frame: 12 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  18. Change in Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI)

    Time frame: 3 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  19. Change in Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI)

    Time frame: 6 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  20. Change in Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI)

    Time frame: 9 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  21. Change in Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI)

    Time frame: 12 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  22. Change in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF36)

    Time frame: 3 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  23. Change in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF36)

    Time frame: 6 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  24. Change in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF36)

    Time frame: 9 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  25. Change in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF36)

    Time frame: 12 months

    to evaluate clinical efficiency

  26. Change in CRP

    Time frame: 1 month

    to evaluate biological efficiency

  27. Change in CRP

    Time frame: 3 months

    to evaluate biological efficiency

  28. Change in CRP

    Time frame: 6 months

    to evaluate biological efficiency

  29. Change in CRP

    Time frame: 9 months

    to evaluate biological efficiency

  30. Change in CRP

    Time frame: 12 months

    to evaluate biological efficiency

  31. Change in ESR (Erythrocyte sedimentation rate)

    Time frame: 1 month

    to evaluate biological efficiency

  32. Change in ESR (Erythrocyte sedimentation rate)

    Time frame: 3 months

    to evaluate biological efficiency

  33. Change in ESR (Erythrocyte sedimentation rate)

    Time frame: 6 months

    to evaluate biological efficiency

  34. Change in ESR (Erythrocyte sedimentation rate)

    Time frame: 9 months

    to evaluate biological efficiency

  35. Change in ESR (Erythrocyte sedimentation rate)

    Time frame: 12 months

    to evaluate biological efficiency

  36. Change in Fibrin

    Time frame: 1 month,

    to evaluate biological efficiency

  37. Change in Fibrin

    Time frame: 3 months

    to evaluate biological efficiency

  38. Change in Fibrin

    Time frame: 6 months

    to evaluate biological efficiency

  39. Change in Fibrin

    Time frame: 9 months

    to evaluate biological efficiency

  40. Change in Fibrin

    Time frame: 12 months

    to evaluate biological efficiency

  41. Decreased in serum increased cytokines, in selected RNA in peripheral blood and skin specimens

    Time frame: 1 month

    to evaluate targeted biological efficiency

  42. Decreased in serum increased cytokines, in selected RNA in peripheral blood and skin specimens

    Time frame: 3 months

    to evaluate targeted biological efficiency

  43. Decreased in serum increased cytokines, in selected RNA in peripheral blood and skin specimens

    Time frame: 6 months

    to evaluate targeted biological efficiency

  44. Decreased in serum increased cytokines, in selected RNA in peripheral blood and skin specimens

    Time frame: 12 months

    to evaluate targeted biological efficiency

  45. RNA analysis of targeted cytokines and RNA sequencing

    Time frame: 6 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Other

Collaborators

  • URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin

Registry information

Official study title

Personalized Targeted Therapies in Inflammatory Complex Multi Organ Disease

Acronym: PIMOC

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Aug 29, 2018
Registry last updated
May 20, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.