Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
NCT Number: NCT05766683
STUDY QUESTION: Does the depth of injection of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin in the glabellar complex affect efficacy of the BoTN for the improvement of glabellar frown lines? STUDY AIM
* Primary objective: Compare the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm vs 4mm for the improvement of glabellar lines * Secondary objective: Determine any adverse effects of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm vs 4mm
RATIONALE FOR THE PROJECT:
Although the use of BoTN for treatment of glabellar lines has long been established as safe and effective, the optimal depth of injection has not been established. Our project hopes to establish the optimal depth of injection for onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin for maximal improvement of glabellar lines with minimal adverse effects
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
STUDY AIM, BACKGROUND, AND DESIGN ABSTRACT
Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is a safe and effective treatment for numerous conditions in neurology, ophthalmology, dermatology, gastroenterology, psychiatry, and urology. In dermatology, BoNT is commonly used for treatment of facial rhytides and is by far the most frequently performed cosmetic procedure in recent years. In 2002, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of BoNT for the treatment of glabellar lines. Although, BoNT has shown excellent safety profile for the treatment of glabellar lines, injection methods vary widely between practitioners and no standardized method for the depth of injection has been established.
The most common treatment area is the glabellar complex, which consists of bilateral corrugator supercilii, depressor supercilii, procerus, and the orbital portion of the orbicularis oculi. With increasing age and repetitive contraction of the glabellar complex, particularly the bilateral corrugator supercilii and procerus, the formation of prominent dynamic glabellar lines and static, etched-in glabellar lines can form and lead to the appearance a more severe frown. In a study using ultrasonographic imaging and the three-dimensional scanning Cho et al. determined that the procerus was located at a depth of 3.8 ± 0.7 mm at the glabella and 2.7 ± 0.6 mm at the sellion while the intercanthal vein was located 3.0 ± 0.6 mm below the skin's surface superior to the sellion. Careful consideration of depth of injection and facial anatomy must be taken to avoid bruising and intravascular injection of BoTN. Additionally, in a cadaveric study looking at depth of corrugator supercilii of 32 Korean hemifaces using 3D scanning, Lee et al. found that the corrugator supercilii muscle rested at a depth of 5.7 +/-1.4 mm medially and 6.6 +/-1.4mm laterally and recommended BoTN injections at the depth of 4mm. However, no in vivo studies have been performed to validate this as the optimal depth of injection. In a split face study evaluating the depth of botulinum injection into the corrugator supercilii muscle no difference in brow height between injecting periosteally versus in superficial dermis. The investigators previously studied the ability of botulinum toxin to diffuse in crow's feet through laser pores into the target muscle. (8)
In our randomized study, the investigators will evaluate the efficacy of BoTN for the treatment of glabellar lines when injected at a depth of 2mm (superficial dermis) versus 4mm (intramuscularly). The investigators hypothesize that no difference exists between the two depths as the 150kD botulinum toxin molecules can easily diffuse to the target at the muscle. If this is validated, patients can be treated with more superficial depths, which will result in less pain and bruising.
STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Depth of injection of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin in the glabellar complex does not affect efficacy of the BoTN for the improvement of glabellar lines.
STUDY AIM
RATIONALE FOR THE PROJECT:
Although the use of BoTN for treatment of glabellar lines has long been established as safe and effective, the optimal depth of injection has not been established. Our project hopes to establish the optimal depth of injection for onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin for maximal improvement of glabellar lines with minimal adverse effects.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
One time administration of onabotulinumtoxinA to the corrugator supercilii muscles bilaterally. Dosing dependent on the baseline mass and volume of subject's glabellar muscles as assessed by trained cosmetic dermatologist, accounting for symmetry/asymmetry of the face and can range from 10-50 units. Will be administered at a depth of 2mm
One time administration of onabotulinumtoxinA to the corrugator supercilii muscles bilaterally. Dosing dependent on the baseline mass and volume of subject's glabellar muscles as assessed by trained cosmetic dermatologist, accounting for symmetry/asymmetry of the face and can range from 10-50 units. Will be administered at a depth of 4mm
Time frame: 120 days
Assess the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm for the improvement of glabellar lines using the Merz aesthetics scales.
The Merz scale is as follows:
0 - no glabellar lines
1- mild glabellar lines 2 - moderate glabellar lines 3 - severe glabellar lines 4 - very severe glabellar lines
Time frame: 120 days
Assess the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 4mm for the improvement of glabellar lines using the Merz aesthetics scales.
The Merz scale is as follows:
0 - no glabellar lines
1- mild glabellar lines 2 - moderate glabellar lines 3 - severe glabellar lines 4 - very severe glabellar lines
Time frame: 120 days
Incidence of any adverse effects of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm vs 4mm.
Time frame: 120 days
Compare the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm vs 4mm for the improvement of glabellar lines using the Merz aesthetics scale.
The Merz scale is as follows:
0 - no glabellar lines
1- mild glabellar lines 2 - moderate glabellar lines 3 - severe glabellar lines 4 - very severe glabellar lines
Henry Ford Health System
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06448676
Glabellar Frown Lines, Glabellar Furrowing
Amsterdam, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT05481931
Glabellar Frown Lines
Cologne, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT06585696
Glabellar Frown Lines
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05148000
Canthal Lines, Glabellar Frown Lines
New York, United States
View Trial Details