The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
Kunming, Yunnan, 650106, China
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07712848
Protocol Title: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study of Venetoclax Plus 3-Day Decitabine (DEC3-VEN) Versus Venetoclax Plus "2+6" DA Versus "3+7" DA Regimen in Adult Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Objective: This is a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase II trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of three induction regimens-Venetoclax plus 3-day Decitabine (DEC3-VEN), Venetoclax plus "2+6" DA, and standard "3+7" DA-in adult patients with newly diagnosed, intensifiable AML.
Study Design: The study employs a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter design. A total of 291 eligible patients will be enrolled across approximately 10 centers in China and randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to the three treatment arms.
Key Eligibility Criteria:
Inclusion: Aged 16-65 with newly diagnosed non-APL AML (excluding favorable CBF-AML), eligible for intensive chemotherapy, ECOG ≤2, and adequate organ function.
Exclusion: Prior AML treatment, secondary AML, active severe infection, significant cardiac comorbidity, or known hypersensitivity to the study drugs.
Interventions:
Induction:
Arm A (VEN+"2+6"DA): Venetoclax (D1-8), Daunorubicin (D2-3), Cytarabine (D2-7).
Arm B (DEC3-VEN): Venetoclax (D1-14), Decitabine (D4-6). FLT3/ITD+ patients add Sorafenib or Gilteritinib (D8-14).
Arm C ("3+7"DA): Daunorubicin (D1-3), Cytarabine (D1-7).
Consolidation (2 cycles):
Arms A/B: Venetoclax + Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine.
Arm C: High-Dose Cytarabine.
Consolidation (Subsequent cycles):
All arms receive multiple cycles of DA or HA regimens.
Maintenance (6-8 cycles):
Arms A/B: Venetoclax + Azacitidine.
Arm C: Azacitidine.
Main Outcome Measures:
Primary Endpoint: Composite Complete Remission Rate (CR + CRi) after induction.
Secondary Endpoints: Overall Survival (OS), CR rate, MRD-negative rate, Relapse-Free Survival (RFS), Event-Free Survival (EFS), and safety.
Keywords: Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Venetoclax, Decitabine, Consolidation Therapy, Maintenance Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Kunming, Yunnan, 650106, China
Location status: Recruiting
This Phase 3, open-label, randomized controlled trial employs a three-arm parallel design to evaluate the optimal integration of venetoclax into intensive chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML. The study is designed to address the critical unmet need of balancing high remission rates with tolerability in fit adult AML patients.
Scientific Rationale for Treatment Arms:
Arm A (VEN+"2+6" DA) investigates a modified intensive regimen where daunorubicin exposure is limited to 2 days (vs. conventional 3 days) based on prior institutional data suggesting comparable efficacy with reduced cardiotoxicity. Arm B (DEC3-VEN) explores a novel combination of venetoclax with high-dose decitabine (20 mg/m² every 8 hours for 3 days), a regimen developed to enhance hypomethylating effects while limiting myelosuppression duration to approximately 2 weeks through shortened decitabine exposure. Arm C represents the standard "3+7" DA regimen as the reference arm.
Venetoclax Pharmacological Considerations:
The 100→200→400 mg dose ramp-up over 2-3 days is implemented for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) prophylaxis, with extended dosing through Day 8 (Arm A) or Day 14 (Arm B) based on the pharmacokinetic principle of sustained BCL-2 inhibition. For FLT3-ITD positive patients in Arm B, sorafenib or gilteritinib is added from Day 8 to target dual oncogenic pathways.
Stratification and Randomization:
Randomization employs block randomization with stratification by study center to ensure balance across the 10 participating sites. The 2:2:1 allocation ratio (Arms A:B:C) prioritizes evaluation of the two experimental venetoclax-containing regimens while maintaining adequate power for the standard arm comparison.
MRD Assessment Methodology:
Measurable residual disease is evaluated by multi-parameter flow cytometry (sensitivity 10-⁴) and, where available, NGS-based sequencing to provide complementary sensitivity for treatment response characterization. MRD assessment is performed at remission confirmation and post-consolidation to evaluate depth of response.
Statistical Considerations:
The primary analysis employs a non-inferiority framework comparing the composite CR rate (CR+CRi) of each experimental arm against the standard arm, with a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -10%. Hierarchical testing controls for multiplicity, prioritizing Arm A followed by Arm B comparisons. An interim analysis for futility is planned after 50% enrollment to preserve resources if either experimental arm shows <50% response rate.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
-
Subjects who are suitable for enrollment in this study must meet all of the following criteria:
Creatinine ≥ 30 mL/min, calculated by the Cockcroft Gault formula or measured by 24-hour urine collection;
Exclusion criteria
<!-- -->
Venetoclax (Days 1-8), Daunorubicin (Days 2-3), Cytarabine (Days 2-7)
Venetoclax (Days 1-14), Decitabine (Days 4-6). FLT3/ITD-positive patients receive additional Sorafenib or Gilteritinib (Days 8-14).
Daunorubicin (Days 1-3), Cytarabine (Days 1-7)
Time frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Percentage of patients achieving composite complete remission (CR + CRi) after induction therapy (defined as the first 28-day cycle of treatment). Complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) are defined according to the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 criteria. Response is assessed by bone marrow aspiration and biopsy performed at a central laboratory between Day 21 and Day 28 of the induction cycle (or upon count recovery). The measurement unit is the percentage of patients achieving CR or CRi among all randomized patients (intention-to-treat population).
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months
Time from randomization to death from any cause (Overall Survival), assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, with the difference between treatment groups evaluated by the stratified log-rank test. The measurement unit is months.
Time frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Percentage of patients achieving measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity, assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) with a sensitivity threshold of 0.1% (10-³) in patients who achieved CR/CRi.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months
Time from first documented CR/CRi to confirmed hematologic relapse or death. Relapse defined per ELN 2022 criteria. Assessed by Kaplan-Meier method. Reported as median months with 95% CI.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months
Event-free survival, defined as the time from randomization to treatment failure (failure to achieve CR/CRi within 6 cycles), confirmed relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The measurement unit is months.
Time frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 5.0. The measurement unit is the percentage of patients experiencing each grade of adverse event. Incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs), assessed using the NCI CTCAE version 5.0, with events defined as those leading to death, life-threatening, requiring hospitalization, or causing significant disability.Incidence of grade ≥3 infections, including pneumonia, sepsis, and febrile neutropenia, assessed using the NCI CTCAE version 5.0.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Yaxian Tan
CONTACT
ZePing Zhou
CONTACT
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
Other
A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Venetoclax Combined With 3-Day Decitabine (DEC3-VEN) Versus Venetoclax Combined With "2+6" DA Versus "3+7" DA Regimen in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07347418
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia), Bone Marrow Diseases
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07588360
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia), Anemia
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07486713
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia), Adenocarcinoma
Orange, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07607418
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia), Anemia
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial Details