Kristen Nowak
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
NCT Number: NCT03342742
The proposed research will determine the feasibility of delivering two behavioral weight loss interventions for 1 year in adults with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) who are overweight or obese. The study will also compare these two interventions in terms of safety, acceptability, and tolerability. Last, this pilot trial will provide initial insight into a) biological changes and b) changes in kidney growth with each of the two weight loss interventions.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is characterized by development and continued growth of numerous fluid-filled renal cysts that ultimately result in renal failure. Similar to the general population, the prevalence of overweight and obesity have been rising in ADPKD patients, effecting about two-thirds of individuals. Surprisingly, the role of obesity in ADPKD progression is currently unknown. The investigators have novel preliminary data that overweight and obesity are independently associated with substantially faster kidney growth in ADPKD patients. Furthermore, in rodent models of ADPKD, mild-to-moderate food restriction profoundly slows cyst growth and maintains renal function via mechanisms including AMPK-activated kinase pathway activation and suppression of mammalian target of rapamycin/S6 kinase signaling and insulin-like growth factor-1 levels. Collectively, these data suggest that dietary restriction regimens may slow ADPKD progression. Accordingly, the primary aim is to determine the feasibility of delivering a 1 year behavioral weight loss intervention program in 30 overweight/obese adults with ADPKD, based on either daily caloric restriction (DCR) or intermittent fasting (IMF), with a similar (~34%) targeted weekly energy deficit. A key secondary goal is to evaluate safety, acceptability, and tolerability of IMF in ADPKD versus DCR. Last, the third exploratory aim is to a) obtain mechanistic insight into biological pathways that may be altered and b) provide initial insight into any changes in total kidney volume by magnetic resonance imaging with IMF and/or DCR.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Weight loss behavioral intervention via one of two strategies.
Time frame: Through study completion, an expected duration of 18 months
Numbers of individuals pre-screened
Time frame: Through study completion, an expected duration of 18 months
Numbers of individuals screened
Time frame: Through study completion, an expected duration of 18 months
Numbers of individuals enrolled
Time frame: Through study completion, an expected duration of 18 months
Numbers of individuals retained
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, and 1 year
Measurement of body weight pre to post intervention in each group
Time frame: 1 year
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events in each group as evaluated by monthly phone questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline
Quality of life (QOL) will be assessed with the RAND 36 Item Health Survey (RAND-36) physical and mental health component summary score. The Rand-36 measures quality of life. Possible scores for each subscale range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life and better outcome.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
Quality of life (QOL) will be assessed with the RAND 36 Item Health Survey (RAND-36) physical and mental health component summary score. The Rand-36 measures quality of life. Possible scores for each subscale range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life and better outcome.
Time frame: 1 Year
Quality of life (QOL) will be assessed with the RAND 36 Item Health Survey (RAND-36) physical and mental health component summary score. The Rand-36 measures quality of life. Possible scores for each subscale range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life and better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline
Mood state will be assessed with the Profile of Mood States 2 (POMS-2). The POMS-2 measures mood. Possible scores for the Vigor scale range from 0 to 32, with higher scores for indicating a better outcome. Possible scores for the fatigue scale range from 0 to 28 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
Mood state will be assessed with the Profile of Mood States 2 (POMS-2). The POMS-2 measures mood. Possible scores range from 0 to 20 for both the Vigor and Fatigue subscales, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Time frame: 1 Year
Mood state will be assessed with the Profile of Mood States 2 (POMS-2). The POMS-2 measures mood. Possible scores range from 0 to 20 for both the Vigor and Fatigue subscales, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks and 1 year
Self-reported energy intake
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks and 1 year
Self-reported macronutrient intake
Time frame: Baseline
Serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels will be evaluated in each group
Time frame: 12 Weeks
Serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels will be evaluated in each group
Time frame: 1 Year
Serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels will be evaluated in each group
Time frame: Baseline
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) levels will be evaluated in each group
Time frame: 12 Weeks
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) levels will be evaluated in each group
Time frame: 1 Year
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) levels will be evaluated in each group
Time frame: Baseline and 1 year
Ratio of protein expression of phosphorylated S6K to S6K peripheral blood mononuclear cell protein expression of S6 kinase (S6K) in each group.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 year
Ratio of peripheral blood mononuclear cell protein expression of phosphorylated AMP-activated kinase (AMPK) to AMPK in each group
Time frame: Baseline and 1 year
Percent change from baseline in height adjusted total kidney volume by MRI in each group
University of Colorado, Denver
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02847624
Abnormalities, Multiple, Ciliopathies
Tokyo, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT05521191
ADPKD, Abnormalities, Multiple
Mesa, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04534985
Abnormalities, Multiple, Body Weight
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04407481
Abnormalities, Multiple, Ciliopathies
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details