The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Shatin, Hong Kong
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT05292612
Background:
Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is a common mental problem, where people experience severe and disabling anxiety about social situations and interactions. It is highly prevalent world-wide and in Hong Kong, causing significant suffering/distress. While evidence-based interventions exist, e.g., cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), there will be not enough trained therapists to meet the treatment demand so that the majority of the SAD patients receive no treatment. Internet-based therapies may offer a solution, given that they deliver treatment more cost-efficiently by requiring lesser therapist time so that more patients can be treated with the same therapist resources. One UK internet-based CBT protocol for SAD, iCBT(C&W), shows high efficacy and efficiency in initial UK and Hong Kong trials with Englishspeaking patients.
Objectives:
1. To develop and confirm the efficacy of a Chinese-language version of iCBT(C&W), administered by clinical psychologists in standard therapist-guided format. 2. To develop an even more cost-efficient new self-help format with some minimal 'coaching' performed by trained psychology bachelor-level graduates - its efficacy expected as 'noninferior' to that of the therapist-guided format.
Overall design:
Three-arm parallel group randomised controlled noninferiority trial: Standard therapist-guided iCT-SAD vs. Guided self-help iCT-SAD vs. Waitlist
Method:
The iCBT(C&W) protocol will be translated into Chinese. Approximately 110 Chinese adults with SAD will be recruited in Hong Kong and randomised into one of two treatment conditions, therapist-guided versus self-help. The treatment lasts 14 weeks. The primary outcome measure will be Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (self-report version).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–100 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Shatin, Hong Kong
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion
Exclusion
iCBT(C&W) for SAD implements all the key procedures of the face-to-face treatment. Patients are guided through the treatment by using secure messaging and regular telephone or webcam calls. The treatment comprises a series of online modules, each of which includes educational texts, patient testimonies, video illustrations, case examples, questionand- answer boxes, monitoring sheets, behavioural experiments and other homework assignments.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 14 weeks
LSAS consists of twenty-four items to assess individual's fear and avoidance towards different social interactions and performance situations. A total of six subscale scores could be obtained in LSAS, including the total fear, fear of social interactions, fear of performance situations, total avoidance, avoidance of social interactions, and avoidance of performance situations.
Time frame: at 3-month post-treatment follow-up
LSAS consists of twenty-four items to assess individual's fear and avoidance towards different social interactions and performance situations. A total of six subscale scores could be obtained in LSAS, including the total fear, fear of social interactions, fear of performance situations, total avoidance, avoidance of social interactions, and avoidance of performance situations.
Time frame: at 9-month post-treatment follow-up
LSAS consists of twenty-four items to assess individual's fear and avoidance towards different social interactions and performance situations. A total of six subscale scores could be obtained in LSAS, including the total fear, fear of social interactions, fear of performance situations, total avoidance, avoidance of social interactions, and avoidance of performance situations.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 14 weeks
PHQ-9 consists of nine items that captures the criterion symptoms of DSM-5 major depressive disorder
Time frame: at 3-month post-treatment follow-up
PHQ-9 consists of nine items that captures the criterion symptoms of DSM-5 major depressive disorder
Time frame: at 9-month post-treatment follow-up
PHQ-9 consists of nine items that captures the criterion symptoms of DSM-5 major depressive disorder
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 14 weeks
GAD-7 consists of seven items that captures the criterion symptoms of DSM-5 common anxiety disorders
Time frame: at 3-month post-treatment follow-up
GAD-7 consists of seven items that captures the criterion symptoms of DSM-5 common anxiety disorders
Time frame: at 9-month post-treatment follow-up
GAD-7 consists of seven items that captures the criterion symptoms of DSM-5 common anxiety disorders
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 14 weeks
WSAS consists of five items that measure participants' perceived functional impairment incurred by their presenting psychiatric problem (which, in this study, refers to SAD)
Time frame: at 3-month post-treatment follow-up
WSAS consists of five items that measure participants' perceived functional impairment incurred by their presenting psychiatric problem (which, in this study, refers to SAD)
Time frame: at 9-month post-treatment follow-up
WSAS consists of five items that measure participants' perceived functional impairment incurred by their presenting psychiatric problem (which, in this study, refers to SAD)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 14 weeks
SPWSS is a five-item self-report questionnaire on social anxiety, social avoidance, self-focused versus external-focused attention, anticipatory processing, and post-event rumination.
Time frame: at 3-month post-treatment follow-up
SPWSS is a five-item self-report questionnaire on social anxiety, social avoidance, self-focused versus external-focused attention, anticipatory processing, and post-event rumination.
Time frame: at 9-month post-treatment follow-up
SPWSS is a five-item self-report questionnaire on social anxiety, social avoidance, self-focused versus external-focused attention, anticipatory processing, and post-event rumination.
Time frame: at baseline
A behavioural assessment scheme, which includes the Simulated Social Interaction Test, unstructured conversation tasks and an impromptu speech, is adopted to measure social performance. Self-ratings of the behavioural scheme in skill and anxiety domains will be obtained by participants (self ratings) and observers (observer ratings). Ratings will be given in a 5-point Likert Scale. In the anxiety domain, 1 refers to the least anxiety while 5 refers to the most anxiety. In the skill domain, 1 refers to the worst skill and 5 refers to the best skill. Mean scores of the ratings will be calculated and used for analysis.
Time frame: 1 week after completing the 14-week treatment
A behavioural assessment scheme, which includes the Simulated Social Interaction Test, unstructured conversation tasks and an impromptu speech, is adopted to measure social performance. Self-ratings of the behavioural scheme in skill and anxiety domains will be obtained by participants (self ratings) and observers (observer ratings). Ratings will be given in a 5-point Likert Scale. In the anxiety domain, 1 refers to the least anxiety while 5 refers to the most anxiety. In the skill domain, 1 refers to the worst skill and 5 refers to the best skill. Mean scores of the ratings will be calculated and used for analysis.
Time frame: At baseline
Social Participation (SP) is a self-report questionnaire for evaluation of one's frequency of social participation from different social relationships. It is measured in a 7-point Likert Scale on the frequency of participation in 13 different social contexts where "1" refers to "never participated" and "7" refers to "always participated". The higher the score, the better the social functioning outcome.
Time frame: week 8 of treatment
Social Participation (SP) is a self-report questionnaire for evaluation of one's frequency of social participation from different social relationships. It is measured in a 7-point Likert Scale on the frequency of participation in 13 different social contexts where "1" refers to "never participated" and "7" refers to "always participated". The higher the score, the better the social functioning outcome.
Time frame: 1 week after completing the 14-week treatment
Social Participation (SP) is a self-report questionnaire for evaluation of one's frequency of social participation from different social relationships. It is measured in a 7-point Likert Scale on the frequency of participation in 13 different social contexts where "1" refers to "never participated" and "7" refers to "always participated". The higher the score, the better the social functioning outcome.
Time frame: 3-month post-treatment follow-up
Social Participation (SP) is a self-report questionnaire for evaluation of one's frequency of social participation from different social relationships. It is measured in a 7-point Likert Scale on the frequency of participation in 13 different social contexts where "1" refers to "never participated" and "7" refers to "always participated". The higher the score, the better the social functioning outcome.
Time frame: At baseline
Social Participation (SP) is a self-report questionnaire for evaluation of one's subjective satisfaction from 5 different social relationships where "1" refers to "the least satisfaction" and "7" refers to "the most satisfaction". The higher the score, the better the social functioning outcome.
Time frame: week 8 of treatment
Social Participation (SP) is a self-report questionnaire for evaluation of one's subjective satisfaction from 5 different social relationships where "1" refers to "the least satisfaction" and "7" refers to "the most satisfaction". The higher the score, the better the social functioning outcome.
Time frame: 1 week after completing the 14-week treatment
Social Participation (SP) is a self-report questionnaire for evaluation of one's subjective satisfaction from 5 different social relationships where "1" refers to "the least satisfaction" and "7" refers to "the most satisfaction". The higher the score, the better the social functioning outcome.
Time frame: 3-month post-treatment follow-up
Social Participation (SP) is a self-report questionnaire for evaluation of one's subjective satisfaction from 5 different social relationships where "1" refers to "the least satisfaction" and "7" refers to "the most satisfaction". The higher the score, the better the social functioning outcome.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Candace Ng
CONTACT
Patrick Leung, Prof.
CONTACT
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Other
Chinese Internet-delivered Cognitive Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder in Hong Kong: A Randomised Controlled Noninferiority Trial to Compare Clinician Versus Coach Guidance
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05683223
Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05467683
Anxiety Disorders, Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06563310
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07589621
Anxiety Disorders, Body Dysmorphic Disorder
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
View Trial Details