University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Sophia Hovakimian
CONTACT
Stefanie Russman Block, Ph.D
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT06563310
This study seeks to understand emotion regulation in those with young adults with anxiety using real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback, a tool that allows individuals to control brain activity. The goal of this project is to understand how receiving feedback about one's own brain activity relates to emotion regulation ability. This work will help the study team understand the brain areas involved in emotion regulation and could lay the groundwork to test if psychotherapy outcomes can be enhanced using neurofeedback.
The study hypotheses include:
* Participants receiving veritable-Neurofeedback (NF) will show a greater activation increases in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) compared to sham-NF * Participants receiving veritable-NF will show greater cognitive reappraisal (CR) ability compared to those receiving sham-NF * PFC activation will positively correlate with CR ability
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–24 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Sophia Hovakimian
CONTACT
Stefanie Russman Block, Ph.D
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will complete 4 visits (some can be done virtually). The baseline visit will include a clinical interview. Eligible participants will complete a series of questionnaires and a practice session at visit 2, and may do a mock scan if the visit is in person. Visit 3 will take place within 5 days of the practice session. Participants will have an fMRI with real neurofeedback and answer a series of questions pertaining to the scan. 2 weeks after visit 3, participants will revisit the questionnaires they completed at baseline. Visit 4 will take place one month after visit 3 and will include a follow-up interview with an assessor and the final questionnaire collection.
Participants will complete 4 visits (some can be done virtually). The baseline visit will include a clinical interview. Eligible participants will complete a series of questionnaires and a practice session at visit 2, and may do a mock scan if the visit is in person. Visit 3 will take place within 5 days of the practice session. Participants will have an fMRI with neurofeedback that looks similar to real neurofeedback but does not reflect their true brain signal. Afterwards, they will answer a series of questions pertaining to the scan. 2 weeks after visit 3, participants will revisit the questionnaires they completed at baseline. Visit 4 will take place one month after visit 3 and will include a follow-up interview with an assessor and the final questionnaire collection.
Time frame: Approximately 60 minutes
Time frame: Approximately 60 minutes
The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) is a pictorial assessment technique in which a changing manikin figure depicts values along the primary dimension of affective valence (positive/negative). Users may indicate emotional reactions along a scale from 1-9, with higher numbers indicating greater negative affect. After the scan, participants will rate each image they saw from the IAPS along this scale. Differences in SAM ratings from look to reappraise trials will be evaluated and compared between sham-NF and veritable-NF groups.
Time frame: Approximately 60 minutes
To examine amygdala connectivity, the study team will use a psychophysiological interaction analysis. Deconvolved time series from anatomical left and right amygdala seeds for each participant will be multiplied by a vector for the reappraise > look contrast at each run (baseline, Neruofeedback1 (NF1), NF2, NF3, transfer). Regressors for the seed time series, the original condition and the interaction term will be convolved with the canonical hemodynamic response function. Change in connectivity from pre-to-post training will be calculated by subtracting the baseline-run contrast map from the transfer-run contrast map. Resulting contrast maps will be entered into second-level random effects analyses.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Laura Stchur, MSW
CONTACT
Sophia Hovakimian
CONTACT
University of Michigan
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06934525
Agoraphobia, Anxiety
East Providence, Rhode Island, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06132659
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02810171
Agoraphobia, Anxiety
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05157386
ADHD, Anxiety
Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden
View Trial Details