The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Hong Kong
NCT Number: NCT06527625
This study examines the effectiveness of an innovative cultural arts program in reducing depressive symptoms and age-related self-stigma among older Chinese as compared to service as usual through a randomized waitlist controlled trial.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me60 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hong Kong
Depressive symptoms are common among community-dwelling older people, and prevention and early detection can reduce the incidence of depressive disorders. However, internalized ageism and stigma of mental illness may disempower older people and impede help-seeking behaviors among those at risk of depression. Nonpharmacological interventions may reduce stigma, and among different approaches, arts-based programs are gaining attention because arts are deemed enjoyable, stigma-free, and conducive to mental health.
This study adopts a waitlist-controlled trial and examines the effectiveness of an innovative cultural art programme to combat internalised ageism and reduce depressive symptoms compared with service as usual. Community-dwelling older adults (age 60 years and over) at risk for depression will be recruited and randomised to receive cultural arts (experimental group) or service as usual (waitlist control group). Assessments will be administered by trained researcher(s) at baseline (T0), and completion of the 9-session intervention (T1). Effectiveness analyses will be based on changes in assessments at different time points between intervention and control groups.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
9-session group art program using Chinese calligraphy as the channel for gaining emotional awareness and facilitating expression
Treatment as usual provided in local community aged care centres
Time frame: Baseline (T0) and 9 weeks after baseline (T1)
Depressive symptoms are assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (Kroenke et al., 2001). It is a 9-item instrument that incorporates depression diagnostic criteria with other leading major depressive symptoms and rates the frequency of the symptoms, factoring into the scoring severity index. PHQ-9 scores of 5-9, 10-14, 15-19, 20 and above represent mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline (T0) and 9 weeks after baseline (T1)
Self-stigma of age is assessed by the Internalized Stigma of old age scale (IS65+) (González-Domínguez et al., 2018). The IS65+ scale is a 9-item instrument comprised of five factors: alienation, discrimination experience, social withdrawal, stigma resistance, and stereotype endorsement. Participants responded to a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 4 (completely agree), and a higher score indicates more internalized ageism. The original scale had good internal consistency (α = 0.89).
Time frame: Baseline (T0) and 9 weeks after baseline (T1)
Self-stigma of depression is assessed using the 16-item Self-Stigma of Depression Scale (SSDS) (Barney et al., 2006). Questions begin with the stem "If I were depressed, I would …" and include items such as "feel inferior to others" (Shame), "think I should be able to cope with things" (Self-Blame), and "feel I could not contribute much socially" (Social Inadequacy). Participants responded using a 5-point Likert scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). A higher score indicates more self-stigma of depression, and the scale has good construct validity, internal consistency (α = 0.87) and satisfactory test-retest reliability (Cohen's d = 0.17).
Time frame: Baseline (T0) and 9 weeks after baseline (T1)
Empowerment is measured by the self-empowerment subscale (SES, four items) from the Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM) (Young & Bullock, 2003). Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree); higher scores indicate a higher self-reported level of self-empowerment. Example items include: "I believe in myself" and "I have control over my mental health problems"; a higher score indicates more self-empowered.
Time frame: Baseline (T0) and 9 weeks after baseline (T1)
Cognitive fusion is measured by the self-report Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ) (Gillanders et al., 2014). It is a 7-item Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (never true) to 7 (always true). Example items include: "My thoughts cause me distress or emotional pain" and "I tend to get very entangled in my thoughts." Higher scores indicated higher levels of cognitive fusion in participants, ranging from 7 to 49. The scale was validated in Chinese, with good internal consistency (α = 0.92) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.67) (Zhang et al., 2014).
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Other
Cultural Arts for Reducing Depressive Symptoms and Age-related Self-stigma in Older People: a Randomised Waitlist Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06174701
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05925816
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Annandale-on-Hudson, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04837573
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05619510
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details