Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02070380

Crossover Comparison of MultiHance and Dotarem

This study aims at a comparison between MultiHance at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg and 0.05 mmol/kg and Dotarem at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg in brain tumor patients to show superiority of MultiHance.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Samaritan Health Services

Corvallis, Oregon, 97330, United States

About this study

This crossover study aims at a comparison between 0.1 mmol/kg MultiHance and 0.1 mmol/kg Dotarem, between 0.05 MultiHance and 0.1 mmol/kg Dotarem in terms of diagnostic preference at CE-MRI in brain tumor patients to show superiority of MultiHance.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Are at least 18 years of age or older
  • Are able to give written informed consent and are willing to comply with the protocol requirements
  • Are scheduled to undergo MRI
  • Are willing to undergo two MRI procedures within 14 days
  • Have confirmed or are highly suspected to have brain tumor(s) (primary or secondary), as determined by:
  • Clinical/neurological symptomatology;
  • Diagnostic testing, such as CT or previous MRI examinations; or
  • Have had recent brain surgery and are to be evaluated for recurrence

Exclusion criteria

  • Are pregnant or lactating females. Exclude the possibility of pregnancy:
  • By testing on site at the institution within 24 hours prior to the start of each investigational product administration; or
  • By history (i.e., tubal ligation or hysterectomy); or
  • Post menopausal with a minimum of 1 year without menses
  • Have any known allergy to one or more of the ingredients in the investigational products, or have a history of hypersensitivity to any metals
  • Have congestive heart failure (class IV according to the classification of the New York Heart Association)
  • Have suffered a stroke within a year
  • Have received or are scheduled to receive any other contrast medium in the 24 hours preceding through the 24 hours following Exam 1, and in the 24 hours preceding through the 24 hours following Exam 2
  • Have received or are scheduled to receive an investigational compound and/or medical device within 30 days before admission into the present study, through the 24 hours post-administration of the second investigational product
  • Have moderate-to-severe renal impairment, defined as Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)/estimated GFR < 45 mL/min
  • Have been previously entered into this study
  • Have received or are scheduled for one of the following:
  • Surgical or chemotherapeutic treatment within three weeks prior to the first examination or between the two examinations
  • Initiation of steroid therapy between the two examinations
  • Radiosurgery between the two examinations
  • Have any contraindications to MRI such as a pace-maker, magnetic material (i.e., surgical clips) or any other conditions that would preclude proximity to a strong magnetic field
  • Are suffering from severe claustrophobia
  • Have any medical condition or other circumstances which would significantly decrease the chances of obtaining reliable data, achieving study objectives, or completing the study and/or post-dose follow-up examinations

Treatment and study plan

MultiHance 0.1 mmol/kg

Drug

MultiHance administered at 0.1 mmol/kg

DOTAREM

Drug

Dotarem administered at 0.1 mmol/kg

Other names: Dotarem 0.1 mmol/kg

MultiHance 0.05 mmol/kg

Drug

MultiHance administered at 0.05 mmol/kg

Primary outcomes

  1. Global Diagnostic Preference Between the Two Exams

    Time frame: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days

    Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 159 patients who had post-dose exams for both MultiHance, 0.1 mmol/kg and 0.05 mmol/kg doses, and Dotarem 0.1 mmol/kg. Readers assessed whether images with MultiHance were preferred or images with Dotarem were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal. An image set deemed technically inadequate by a blinded reader was excluded from efficacy analysis for that specific reader. Therefore, the number of participant exams evaluated by each reader differed slightly across readers and endpoints.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lesion Border Delineation

    Time frame: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days

    Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 159 patients who had post-dose exams for both MultiHance, 0.1 mmol/kg and 0.05 mmol/kg doses, and Dotarem 0.1 mmol/kg. Readers assessed whether images with MultiHance were preferred or images with Dotarem were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal. An image set deemed technically inadequate by a blinded reader was excluded from efficacy analysis for that specific reader. Therefore, the number of participant exams evaluated by each reader differed slightly across readers and endpoints.

  2. Lesion Internal Morphology

    Time frame: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days

    Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 159 patients who had post-dose exams for both MultiHance, 0.1 mmol/kg and 0.05 mmol/kg doses, and Dotarem 0.1 mmol/kg. Readers assessed whether images with MultiHance were preferred or images with Dotarem were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal. An image set deemed technically inadequate by a blinded reader was excluded from efficacy analysis for that specific reader. Therefore, the number of participant exams evaluated by each reader differed slightly across readers and endpoints.

  3. Extent of Disease

    Time frame: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days

    Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 159 patients who had post-dose exams for both MultiHance, 0.1 mmol/kg and 0.05 mmol/kg doses, and Dotarem 0.1 mmol/kg. Readers assessed whether images with MultiHance were preferred or images with Dotarem were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal. An image set deemed technically inadequate by a blinded reader was excluded from efficacy analysis for that specific reader. Therefore, the number of participant exams evaluated by each reader differed slightly across readers and endpoints.

  4. Lesion Contrast Enhancement

    Time frame: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days

    Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 159 patients who had post-dose exams for both MultiHance, 0.1 mmol/kg and 0.05 mmol/kg doses, and Dotarem 0.1 mmol/kg. Readers assessed whether images with MultiHance were preferred or images with Dotarem were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal. An image set deemed technically inadequate by a blinded reader was excluded from efficacy analysis for that specific reader. Therefore, the number of participant exams evaluated by each reader differed slightly across readers and endpoints.

  5. Lesion to Background Ratio on Post T1-weighed Spin Echo Images

    Time frame: 5-10 minutes Postdose

    The Unit of Measure is lesion-to-background ratio based on lesions assessed. For each lesion, Lesion-to-background ratio (LBR) = SI of lesion/SI of brain. Firstly, LBR of each lesion was assessed for each contrast agent postdose image separately, then the difference in LBR between MultiHance and Dotarem was calculated. The number presented in the result table below is "the mean difference in LBR postdose (MultiHance - Dotarem)"

  6. Lesion-brain Contrast-to-noise Ratio

    Time frame: 5-10 minutes Postdose

    The Unit of Measure is contrast-to-noise ratio based on lesions assessed. For each lesion, Lesion-brain Contrast-to-noise Ratio (CNR) = [(SI of lesion - SI of brain)/SD for SI of noise] on Postdose Images of each lesion was calculated for each contrast agent image separately, then the difference in CNR between MultiHance and Dotarem was calculated. The number presented in the result table below is "the mean difference in CNR (MultiHance - Dotarem)"

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Bracco Diagnostics, Inc

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Phase IV, Double Blind, Multi-Center, Randomized, Two-Arm Crossover Study to Compare 0.1 mmol/kg of MultiHance With 0.1 mmol/kg of Dotarem and 0.05 mmol/kg of MultiHance With 0.1 mmol/kg of Dotarem in MRI of the Brain

Acronym: BENEFIT

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Feb 25, 2014
Registry last updated
Jan 10, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.