Samaritan Health Services
Corvallis, Oregon, 97330, United States
NCT Number: NCT02070380
This study aims at a comparison between MultiHance at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg and 0.05 mmol/kg and Dotarem at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg in brain tumor patients to show superiority of MultiHance.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Corvallis, Oregon, 97330, United States
This crossover study aims at a comparison between 0.1 mmol/kg MultiHance and 0.1 mmol/kg Dotarem, between 0.05 MultiHance and 0.1 mmol/kg Dotarem in terms of diagnostic preference at CE-MRI in brain tumor patients to show superiority of MultiHance.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
MultiHance administered at 0.1 mmol/kg
Dotarem administered at 0.1 mmol/kg
Other names: Dotarem 0.1 mmol/kg
MultiHance administered at 0.05 mmol/kg
Time frame: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days
Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 159 patients who had post-dose exams for both MultiHance, 0.1 mmol/kg and 0.05 mmol/kg doses, and Dotarem 0.1 mmol/kg. Readers assessed whether images with MultiHance were preferred or images with Dotarem were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal. An image set deemed technically inadequate by a blinded reader was excluded from efficacy analysis for that specific reader. Therefore, the number of participant exams evaluated by each reader differed slightly across readers and endpoints.
Time frame: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days
Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 159 patients who had post-dose exams for both MultiHance, 0.1 mmol/kg and 0.05 mmol/kg doses, and Dotarem 0.1 mmol/kg. Readers assessed whether images with MultiHance were preferred or images with Dotarem were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal. An image set deemed technically inadequate by a blinded reader was excluded from efficacy analysis for that specific reader. Therefore, the number of participant exams evaluated by each reader differed slightly across readers and endpoints.
Time frame: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days
Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 159 patients who had post-dose exams for both MultiHance, 0.1 mmol/kg and 0.05 mmol/kg doses, and Dotarem 0.1 mmol/kg. Readers assessed whether images with MultiHance were preferred or images with Dotarem were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal. An image set deemed technically inadequate by a blinded reader was excluded from efficacy analysis for that specific reader. Therefore, the number of participant exams evaluated by each reader differed slightly across readers and endpoints.
Time frame: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days
Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 159 patients who had post-dose exams for both MultiHance, 0.1 mmol/kg and 0.05 mmol/kg doses, and Dotarem 0.1 mmol/kg. Readers assessed whether images with MultiHance were preferred or images with Dotarem were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal. An image set deemed technically inadequate by a blinded reader was excluded from efficacy analysis for that specific reader. Therefore, the number of participant exams evaluated by each reader differed slightly across readers and endpoints.
Time frame: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days
Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 159 patients who had post-dose exams for both MultiHance, 0.1 mmol/kg and 0.05 mmol/kg doses, and Dotarem 0.1 mmol/kg. Readers assessed whether images with MultiHance were preferred or images with Dotarem were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal. An image set deemed technically inadequate by a blinded reader was excluded from efficacy analysis for that specific reader. Therefore, the number of participant exams evaluated by each reader differed slightly across readers and endpoints.
Time frame: 5-10 minutes Postdose
The Unit of Measure is lesion-to-background ratio based on lesions assessed. For each lesion, Lesion-to-background ratio (LBR) = SI of lesion/SI of brain. Firstly, LBR of each lesion was assessed for each contrast agent postdose image separately, then the difference in LBR between MultiHance and Dotarem was calculated. The number presented in the result table below is "the mean difference in LBR postdose (MultiHance - Dotarem)"
Time frame: 5-10 minutes Postdose
The Unit of Measure is contrast-to-noise ratio based on lesions assessed. For each lesion, Lesion-brain Contrast-to-noise Ratio (CNR) = [(SI of lesion - SI of brain)/SD for SI of noise] on Postdose Images of each lesion was calculated for each contrast agent image separately, then the difference in CNR between MultiHance and Dotarem was calculated. The number presented in the result table below is "the mean difference in CNR (MultiHance - Dotarem)"
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc
Industry
Phase IV, Double Blind, Multi-Center, Randomized, Two-Arm Crossover Study to Compare 0.1 mmol/kg of MultiHance With 0.1 mmol/kg of Dotarem and 0.05 mmol/kg of MultiHance With 0.1 mmol/kg of Dotarem in MRI of the Brain
Acronym: BENEFIT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06170073
Aging, Brain Disease
Hong Kong, Tai Po District
View Trial DetailsNCT04970355
Brain Disease, Brain Diseases
München, Bavaria, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT04424199
Brain Disease, Brain Diseases
Castel Goffredo, Mantova, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT02684825
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Rome, Italy
View Trial Details