University of Toledo, Health Science Campus
Toledo, Ohio, 43614, United States
NCT Number: NCT01265797
Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) may be a safe adjunct to medical treatment for pain relief in migraine patients. However, despite the number of CES studies done, many have been open label, single blinded, or have utilized a small group of patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Toledo, Ohio, 43614, United States
This study will evaluate the efficacy of the Fisher Wallace Cranial Stimulator in persons with chronic migraine who have not achieved satisfactory pain control on their current medications.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
participant wears active cranial electrostimulation device for 20 minutes daily for 28 days
Other names: Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrostimulator
participant wears sham device for 20 minutes daily for 28 days
Time frame: 28 day period during run-in month and blinded month
Mean change in headache days between 28 day run-in month and 28 day blinded month, i.e. run-in month mean minus blinded month mean. A good response is >= 50% reduction in headache days (congruent with the Guidelines for Trial of Behavioral Treatments for Recurrent Headache).
Time frame: 14 days recall; measured at end of run-in month and blinded month
Mean difference of PHQ-9 score between the run-in month and blinded month, i.e. PHQ-9 score from run-in month minus blinded month. The PHQ-9 is a tool for assisting in diagnosing depression (over the prior 2 week period) as well as selecting and monitoring treatment. There are nine items, with responses each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), for a total range of 0 to 27. The higher the total the more severe the depressive symptoms.
Time frame: 28 day period in run-in month and open label month
Mean change in headache days between 28 day run-in month and 28 day open label month, i.e. run-in month mean minus open label month mean. A good response is >= 50% reduction in headache days (congruent with the Guidelines for Trial of Behavioral Treatments for Recurrent Headache).
Time frame: 14 day recall, recorded at the end of run-in and open label months
Mean difference of PHQ-9 score between the run-in month and open label month, i.e. PHQ-9 score from run-in month minus open label month. The PHQ-9 is a tool for assisting in diagnosing depression (over the prior 2 week period) as well as selecting and monitoring treatment. There are nine items, with responses each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), for a total range of 0 to 27. The higher the total the more severe the depressive symptoms.
Time frame: after run-in month, after blinded month
Mean difference in HIT-6 score between run-in month and blinded month. The HIT-6 is a tool for screening and monitoring change in headache disability. This disease-specific health survey is intended for adults 18 years of age and older, and is available with a standard four-week recall period. It is a 6 item questionnaire with scores for each item ranging from 6 (never) to 13 (always). The minimum overall score is 36 and the maximum is 78. Higher scores represent greater disability.
Time frame: 28 day period in run-in month and open label month
Mean difference in HIT-6 score between run-in month and open label month. The HIT-6 is a tool for screening and monitoring change in headache disability. This disease-specific health survey is intended for adults 18 years of age and older, and is available with a standard four-week recall period. It is a 6 item questionnaire with scores for each item ranging from 6 (never) to 13 (always). The minimum overall score is 36 and the maximum is 78. Higher scores represent greater disability.
Time frame: 14 days recall; measured at end of run-in month and blinded month
Mean difference in GAD 7 score between run-in month and blinded month. This is a screening tool and severity measure for generalized anxiety disorder addressing symptoms over the prior 2 weeks. It is a 7 item questionnaire with response scores for each item ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (every day). The range for the total score is 0 to 21, with higher scores representing greater symptoms of anxiety
Time frame: 14 day recall, recorded at the end of run-in and open label months
Mean difference in GAD 7 score between run-in month and open label month. This is a screening tool and severity measure for generalized anxiety disorder addressing symptoms over the prior 2 weeks. It is a 7 item questionnaire with response scores for each item ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (every day). The range for the total score is 0 to 21, with higher scores representing greater symptoms of anxiety
Time frame: 28 days recall; measured at end of run-in month and blinded month
Mean difference in PHQ 15 score between run-in month and blinded month. The PHQ-15 comprises 15 somatic symptoms experienced over the prior 4 weeks and their severity, each symptom scored from 0 ("not bothered at all") to 2 ("bothered a lot"). The range for the overall score is between 0 and 30, with higher score representing more severe somatic symptoms
Time frame: 28 day period in run-in month and open label month
Mean difference in PHQ 15 score between run-in month and open label month. The PHQ-15 comprises 15 somatic symptoms experienced over the prior 4 weeks and their severity, each symptom scored from 0 ("not bothered at all") to 2 ("bothered a lot"). The range for the overall score is between 0 and 30, with higher score representing more severe somatic symptoms.
Time frame: recorded at the end of run-in month and blinded month
Mean difference of Epworth Sleepiness Scale score between run-in month and blinded month. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale is used to measure excessive daytime sleepiness. This is an 8 item questionnaire, recalling probability of falling asleep in "recent times". The subjects are asked to rate probability of falling asleep in eight different situations. The score for each item ranges from 0 (would never doze) to 3 (high chance of dozing), with the overall score range of 0 to 24. Higher scores represent higher probability of falling asleep.
Time frame: Score recorded at the end of run-in and open label month
Mean difference of Epworth Sleepiness Scale score between run-in month and open label month. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale is used to measure excessive daytime sleepiness. This is an 8 item questionnaire, recalling probability of falling asleep in "recent times". The subjects are asked to rate probability of falling asleep in eight different situations. The score for each item ranges from 0 (would never doze) to 3 (high chance of dozing), with the overall score range of 0 to 24. Higher scores represent higher probability of falling asleep.
University of Toledo Health Science Campus
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04530110
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07699549
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07720895
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Athens, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT06158737
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details