Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States
NCT Number: NCT04590885
The objective of the proposed study is to evaluate the Couple Communication Skills Training (CCST) intervention in 250 patients with advanced cancer and their spouses/intimate partners. Couples will be randomized 1:1 to receive either the CCST or to an attention control condition (Healthy Living Information; HLI). We will evaluate CCST effects on a range of patient and partner relationship and psychological outcomes.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States
For patients and their intimate partners, advanced cancer poses significant challenges that can negatively impact both individuals and the couple's collective well-being. Couples' ability to communicate openly and effectively with each other about cancer-related concerns can improve their psychological adjustment and quality of their relationship. Open and effective communication may also lead to better symptom management and goal-concordant care. However, many couples report difficulties communicating about cancer, even in the context of overall satisfying relationships. This can have a number of deleterious consequences, including deficits in emotional support, decreases in intimacy and relationship quality, and increased psychological distress. Thus, interventions designed to facilitate effective communication between cancer patients and their partners are likely to have beneficial effects on both individual and relationship functioning.
Prior research, including studies conducted by our team, has found that couple-based interventions that target communication lead to positive outcomes for cancer patients and their partners. However, most prior studies have been limited by reliance on an in-person treatment delivery format which keeps many couples from participating. In addition, prior studies have not targeted interventions to couples who are most likely to benefit. There is increasing evidence that psychosocial interventions for cancer, including couple-based interventions, should be targeted to those at risk of poor outcomes. Our prior research indicates that couples who report communication difficulties (e.g., high levels of holding back from discussing cancer-related concerns) have increased psychological distress and poorer relationship functioning and are most likely to benefit from a couple communication intervention specifically designed to addressed their communication problems.
The specific aims of this study are (1)To determine whether CCST significantly improves patients' and partners' individual psychological adjustment (i.e., psychological distress, life completion) and patient health and health care outcomes (physical well-being, symptom distress, advance care planning discussions and completion of advance directives, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits) compared to an education condition. (2) To determine whether, for couples receiving the CCST intervention, improvements in psychological adjustment, relationship functioning, and patient health are mediated by improvements in their communication, including objective measures of communication quality and communal coping (e.g., "we-talk") derived from couple conversations and self-reported protective buffering. (3) To examine differences in response to the CCST intervention for patients versus partners, for male versus female participants, and for patients with different cancer diagnoses (breast, lung, GI, GU). (4) To conduct an implementation-related process evaluation of the intervention.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants attend six 60-minute sessions consisting of education and skills training to enhance cancer-related communication.
Other names: CCST
Participants attend attend six 60-minute sessions consisting of information and support across a range of cancer-related topics.
Other names: HLI
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (up to 8 months), 3 month post intervention follow-up
Change in patient relationship satisfaction measured by the Couples Satisfaction Inventory (higher scores indicate higher satisfaction)
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (up to 8 months), 3 month post intervention follow-up
Change in partner relationship satisfaction measured by the Couples Satisfaction Inventory (higher scores indicate higher satisfaction)
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (up to 8 months), 3 month post intervention follow-up
Change in patient intimacy as measured by the Miller Social Intimacy Scale (higher scores indicate higher intimacy)
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (up to 8 months), 3 month post intervention follow-up
Change in partner intimacy as measured by the Miller Social Intimacy Scale (higher scores indicate higher intimacy)
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (up to 8 months), 3 month post intervention follow-up
Change in patient psychological distress measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (higher scores indicate higher distress)
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (up to 8 months), 3 month post intervention follow-up
Change in partner psychological distress measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (higher scores indicate higher distress)
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (up to 8 months), 3 month post intervention follow-up
Change in patient mood as measured by the Positive and Negative Mood Scale (higher scores on the positive and negative mood subscales indicate higher negative and positive mood, respectively)
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (up to 8 months), 3 month post intervention follow-up
Change in partner mood as measured by the Positive and Negative Mood Scale (higher scores on the positive and negative mood subscales indicate higher negative and positive mood, respectively)
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (up to 8 months), 3 month post intervention follow-up
Change in patient life completion measured by the Life Completion scale of the QUAL-E (higher scores indicate higher completion)
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (up to 8 months), 3 month post intervention follow-up
Change in partner life completion measured by the Life Completion scale of the QUAL-E Family (higher scores indicate higher completion)
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (up to 8 months), 3 month post intervention follow-up
Change in patient physical well being as measured by the Physical Well Being subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale (higher scores indicate higher physical well being)
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (up to 8 months), 3 month post intervention follow-up
Change in symptom distress as measured by the Condensed Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (higher scores indicate higher symptom distress)
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (up to 8 months), 3 month post intervention follow-up
Change in patient advance care planning discussions (presence or absence, via patient self-report)
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (up to 8 months), 3 month post intervention follow-up
Change in patient completion of advanced directives (presence or absence, via patient self-report)
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (up to 8 months), 3 month post intervention follow-up
Change in patient hospitalizations (number of hospitalizations per patient self-report, validated by medical record review)
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (up to 8 months), 3 month post intervention follow-up
Change in patient emergency department visits (number of emergency department visits per patient self-report, validated by medical record review)
Duke University
Other
Couple Communication Skills Training for Advanced Cancer
Acronym: CCST2
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04864418
Advanced Cancer
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07712237
Advanced Cancer
Taipei, Taipei City, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT06722014
Advanced Cancer, Mental Disorders
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05375994
Advanced Cancer, Bronchial Neoplasms
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial Details