Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06796036

Conversational AI in Tactical Casualty Care: Baseline GPT-4o Improves Combat Medic Decision-Making

The aim of the project is to investigate whether the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) support, specifically through the GPT-4 model, enhances the decision-making processes of military medical first responders within the framework of Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC). The study focuses on AI's ability to assist in ventilator settings for injured individuals in combat scenarios, emphasizing improved accuracy and decision-making speed. The project tests the hypothesis that the use of AI can positively impact outcomes without compromising the autonomy of first responders. The results have the potential to optimize patient care in challenging conditions and contribute to the advancement of combat medicine.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Military University Hospital Prague

Prague, 16209, Czechia

About this study

This study investigates the potential of conversational artificial intelligence (AI), specifically GPT-4, to enhance clinical decision-making in Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) scenarios. The primary objective is to evaluate whether AI support improves the accuracy and efficiency of ventilator management decisions for combat medics in high-pressure environments without compromising their autonomy.

A prospective, randomized, within-subject study design will be employed. Thirty combat medics from the Czech Armed Forces will participate. Each participant will complete 10 simulated TCCC scenarios: five with AI assistance and five without. Scenarios will be matched for complexity and randomized to control for order effects. Participants will use ChatGPT on handheld devices to simulate real-time AI-assisted decision-making.

In scenarios involving AI assistance, medics will query GPT-4 for support in optimizing mechanical ventilator settings based on patient data, including blood gas results, vital signs, and ventilator parameters.

The primary outcome is the accuracy of ventilator settings as categorized into "excellent," "acceptable," or "failing" based on predefined TCCC standards. Secondary outcomes include decision-making speed and participants' perception of AI's utility, measured through post-scenario surveys.

The findings aim to determine the feasibility of integrating large language models (LLMs) into combat medical care to optimize patient outcomes and support medics under combat conditions. The study seeks to advance the understanding of AI's role in military medicine, providing a foundation for future deployment of fine-tuned AI solutions in TCCC and other critical care scenarios.

This study offers a proof-of-concept evaluation of LLM applications in combat casualty care, with the potential to improve decision-making and inform the development of specialized AI tools for military use.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Combat medics actively serving in the Czech Armed Forces
  • Completion of standardized Tactical Combat Casualty Care training modules and e-learning on ventilator settings and blood gas interpretation
  • Successful passing of pre-tests to ensure a uniform baseline knowledge level.
  • Willingness to participate and provide informed consent.
  • Availability to complete the full study protocol, including 10 simulated scenarios.

Exclusion criteria

  • Failure to pass the pre-tests or complete TCCC and ventilator management training
  • Prior advanced training or professional certification in critical care or mechanical ventilation that could bias results
  • Refusal to provide informed consent or inability to commit to the study schedule

Treatment and study plan

Combat Medic Decision-Making with and without artificial intelligence assistance

Other

Participants will complete 10 simulated Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) scenarios, with 5 scenarios conducted using AI assistance (GPT-4) and 5 without AI. In AI-assisted scenarios, participants will use GPT-4 to query and optimize ventilator settings based on patient data, while non-AI scenarios rely solely on their clinical judgment.

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of ventilator settings

    Time frame: 1 hour

    Accuracy of ventilator settings as categorized into "excellent," "acceptable," or "failing" based on predefined TCCC standards.

    Excellent means 2 points, acceptable 1 point and failing 0 point.

Other outcomes

  1. Perception of artificial intelligence's utility

    Time frame: 1 hour

    perception of artificial intelligence's utility, measured through post-scenario survey

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Charles University, Czech Republic

Other

Collaborators

  • Czech Technical University in Prague

Registry information

Acronym: FieldAI

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jan 28, 2025
Registry last updated
May 13, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.