University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli
Naples, 80138, Italy
NCT Number: NCT06843083
This study compares the diagnostic performance of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) and Breast MRI in evaluating breast lesions. It aims to assess sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy to identify the optimal imaging modality for clinical scenarios such as dense breast tissue and high-risk populations.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
Female
Observational
Naples, 80138, Italy
Search differences and performance of MRI and CEM
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Informed Consent: Ability to provide written informed consent for participation in the study.
Exclusion criteria
Severe Renal Impairment: Patients with severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²), as they may not safely undergo contrast-enhanced imaging.
CEM combines low-energy mammography with high-energy contrast-enhanced imaging to highlight areas of neo-angiogenesis, which are indicative of malignancy. This intervention will be used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CEM in detecting and characterizing breast lesions, especially in patients with dense breast tissue or inconclusive findings from routine mammography.
Other names: CEM
MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging):
MRI will be used as an alternative imaging modality for breast lesion detection and characterization. MRI provides detailed soft tissue imaging and is widely used in the evaluation of high-risk patients or those with dense breast tissue. The results from MRI will be compared to CEM findings to determine which modality offers superior diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months
The primary outcome of the study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) and Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in detecting and characterizing breast lesions. This will be assessed by evaluating the sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic performance of both imaging modalities. Findings will be correlated with histopathological results or follow-up imaging to determine the accuracy of each modality in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months
This secondary outcome aims to compare the sensitivity and specificity of CEM and MRI in detecting breast lesions. Sensitivity refers to the ability to correctly identify true positives, while specificity refers to correctly identifying true negatives. These metrics will be analyzed to assess the diagnostic capability of each imaging technique.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months
The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) will be calculated for both CEM and MRI. PPV indicates the proportion of positive test results that are true positives, while NPV indicates the proportion of negative test results that are true negatives.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months
This outcome will assess patient preference and tolerability between CEM and MRI. Patients will be asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their comfort during each imaging procedure, and their preference for one modality over the other will be recorded.
Graziella di Grezia
Other
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography or Breast MRI: Which Choice for Optimal Diagnostic Performance?
Acronym: CEM MRI choice
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06843096
Breast Cancer Diagnosis, Breast Cancer Prevention
Rome, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07200427
Behavior, Breast Cancer Prevention
Athens, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT06773897
Breast Cancer, Breast Cancer Prevention
Piscataway, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07238088
Breast Cancer Prevention, Breast Diseases
San Juan, Puerto Rico
View Trial Details