Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05186415

Contrast Enhanced 3D Echocardiographic Quantification of Right Ventricular Volumes in Repaired CHD

We propose the novel integration of two echocardiographic technologies - three-dimensional echocardiography using semi-automated right ventricular analysis coupled with the administration of ultrasound enhancing agents - to improve the inter-rater reliability and accuracy of various measures of right ventricular size and function, compared with cardiac MRI.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

11 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1 / Phase 2

Primary location

Nemours Childrens Hospital

Wilmington, Delaware, 19803, United States

About this study

Patients with repaired congenital heart disease with residual pulmonary insufficiency represent a challenging group of patients with congenital heart disease as they develop progressive right ventricular dilation and failure, increasing the risk for sudden cardiac death and often necessitating pulmonary valve replacement. These patients require close follow-up with serial cardiac imaging; however, the complex three-dimensional structure of these dilated right ventricles renders them difficult to adequately image with traditional two-dimensional echocardiography. Due to these difficulties, cardiac MRI is the current gold standard for assessing right ventricular size and function in these patients. However, cardiac MRI is costly and less accessible for patients than echocardiography. Although initial studies comparing 3D echocardiography with MRI showed that 3D echocardiography underestimates right ventricular size, recent advances in three-dimensional imaging technologies which utilize automated ultrasound "speckle-tracking" and artificial intelligence technology are lessening this inherent bias. Furthermore, the use of commercially-available ultrasound enhancing agents made of lipid microspheres has improved left ventricular endocardial border detection, inter-rater reliability and correlation of 3D echocardiography obtained estimates of left ventricular size and function compared with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR). However, their use has yet to be applied to the three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of the right ventricle in congenital heart disease despite their ability to improve right ventricular endocardial border detection with three-dimensional echocardiography in adults. The investigators propose the novel integration of two echocardiographic technologies - three-dimensional echocardiography using semi-automated right ventricular analysis coupled with the administration of ultrasound enhancing agents - to change the paradigm of how clinicians assess the right ventricles of patients with repaired congenital heart disease with residual pulmonary insufficiency. The investigators hypothesize that ultrasound enhancing agents will improve the inter-rater reliability and accuracy of various measures of right ventricular size and function, compared with cardiac MRI, thereby filling an important gap in existing methods for assessing right ventricular function. Lastly, because of the current limitations in assessing right ventricular function in this population, as a secondary aim, the investigators will also assess three-dimensional right ventricular strain -- a novel quantitative surrogate of right ventricular function.

Overall Objectives: To shift the paradigm in the assessment of right ventricular size and function by developing a protocol to assess the right ventricles in patients with repaired congenital heart disease with residual pulmonary insufficiency by integrating the use of three-dimensional echocardiography with semi-automated right ventricular analysis software with the intravenous administration of ultrasound enhancing agents.

Specific Aim 1. To compare the accuracy and inter-rater reliability of 3D echocardiography-based measurements of right ventricular end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction, with and without contrast, with MRI derived values in patients with repaired congenital heart disease with residual pulmonary insufficiency.

Specific Aim 2. To compare the accuracy and inter-rater reliability of 3D echocardiography measurement of right ventricular strain with MRI derived right ventricular (RV) strain in patients with repaired congenital heart disease with residual pulmonary insufficiency.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients aged 11 or greater with repaired congenital heart disease and residual pulmonary insufficiency who are referred to Nemours A.I. DuPont Hospital for Children for clinically indicated cardiac MRI will be eligible for inclusion.
  • Informed written consent of parent or legal guardian.
  • Informed written assent of subject, if appropriate.

Exclusion criteria

  • Any patients in which Lumason is contraindicated (i.e. prior anaphylactoid reaction) will be ineligible for the clinical ultrasound and ineligible for the study.
  • History of allergic reaction to Lumason, sulfur hexafluoride, sulfur hexafluoride lipid microsphere components, or other ingredients in Lumason (polyethylene glycol, distearoylphosphatidylcholine (DSPC), dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol sodium (DPPG-Na), palmitic acid)
  • Pregnant women will be excluded from the study as well since Lumason has not been studied in pregnancy.

Treatment and study plan

Sulfur Hexafluoride Lipid Type A Microspheres 25 MG Injection Powder for Suspension [LUMASON]

Drug

The patient will receive the weight-based dose of Lumason of 0.03 mL/kg per injection, not to exceed 2.4 mL per injection per the FDA and manufacturer recommendations.

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Size Compared to MRI Derived Values.

    Time frame: All images were obtained on the same day of the study. MRI analysis performed by clinical reading attending. Echo analysis performed offline after completing of imaging.

    Echocardiography derived measurements of right ventricular end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, with and without contrast, and MRI derived values in patients with repaired congenital heart disease

  2. Accuracy of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Function Compared to MRI Derived Values.

    Time frame: All images were obtained on the same day of the study. MRI analysis performed by clinical reading attending. Echo analysis performed offline after completing of imaging.

    Echocardiography derived measurements of right ventricular ejection fraction, with and without contrast, and MRI derived values in patients with repaired congenital heart disease

  3. Inter-rater Reliability of 3D Echocardiography Based Measurements of Right Ventricular Size and Function With and Without Contrast

    Time frame: All echocardiographic images obtained on the day of the study participation. Analysis done offline.

    The agreement of echocardiography derived measurements of right ventricular end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction, with and without contrast, will be compared between the two readers using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparing Echocardiographic and MRI Derived Right Ventricular Strain Measurement.

    Time frame: Echocardiography and MRI images obtained on the day of study participation. Analysis done after image acquisition complete

    3D echocardiography measurement of right ventricular strain will be compared with MRI derived RV strain in patients with repaired congenital heart disease using an intraclass correlation coefficient.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nemours Children's Clinic

Other

Collaborators

  • Thomas Jefferson University

Registry information

Official study title

Contrast Enhanced Three Dimensional Echocardiographic Quantification of Right Ventricular Volumes in Repaired Congenital Heart Disease

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jan 11, 2022
Registry last updated
Apr 27, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.