University Hospital of Padova
Padova, 35128, Italy
NCT Number: NCT07614139
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) with predictive alerts works better than a CGM with standard alerts to prevent low blood sugar (hypoglycemia) in adults with inherited metabolic disorders (IMDs), such as glycogen storage disorders (GSDs) and congenital hyperinsulinism (CH).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does a CGM with predictive alerts lower the time spent with low blood sugar compared to a CGM with standard alerts? Do participants feel better and behave differently when using a CGM with predictive alerts? How accurate are the two CGM devices in this group of people? Researchers will compare two CGM devices - Dexcom G7 (with predictive and standard alerts) and Dexcom ONE+ (with standard alerts only) - to see if predictive alerts help reduce low blood sugar episodes and improve quality of life.
Participants will:
Wear each CGM device for 30 days Have a 30-day break between the two devices Check blood sugar levels and record food intake Complete questionnaires about their experience with each device
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Padova, 35128, Italy
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The Dexcom G7 is a CE-marked continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device worn for 30 days. It provides real-time interstitial glucose readings every 5 minutes. The device offers both threshold-based alerts, activated when glucose levels fall below or rise above pre-set values, and predictive alerts, activated when glucose levels are predicted to reach a threshold within 20 minutes. The low glucose alert threshold was set at 70 mg/dL for all participants.
The Dexcom ONE+ is a CE-marked continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device worn for 30 days. It provides real-time interstitial glucose readings every 5 minutes. The device offers threshold-based alerts only, activated when glucose levels fall below or rise above pre-set values, without predictive alert functionality. The low glucose alert threshold was set at 70 mg/dL for all participants.
Time frame: 30 days per device (total study duration: approximately 90 days including washout period)
Percentage of time spent with interstitial glucose levels below 70 mg/dL, as measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). TBR is reported at two thresholds: TBR1 (54-69 mg/dL) and TBR2 (<54 mg/dL), both expressed as percentage of monitoring time (%), over 30 days for each device.
Unit of Measure: % of monitoring time
Time frame: Time Frame: 30 days per device
Percentage of time spent with interstitial glucose levels within the target range of 70-140 mg/dL, as measured by CGM over 30 days for each device. Expressed as percentage of monitoring time (%).
Unit of Measure: % of monitoring time
Time frame: Time Frame: 30 days per device
Percentage of time spent with interstitial glucose levels above 140 mg/dL, as measured by CGM over 30 days for each device. Expressed as percentage of monitoring time (%).
Unit of Measure: % of monitoring time
Time frame: Time Frame: 30 days per device
Mean interstitial glucose levels calculated over 24 hours and during nighttime (00:00-07:00), as measured by CGM over 30 days for each device.
Unit of Measure: mg/dL
Time frame: 30 days per device
Accuracy of CGM readings compared to capillary blood glucose reference values (Accu-Check Instant, Roche), expressed as Median Absolute Relative Difference (MARD). Capillary and CGM values matched within a ±5-minute time window.
Unit of Measure: %
Time frame: 7 days per device
Total daily energy intake measured during each device wear period Unit of Measure: kcal/day Total daily macronutrient intake measured during each device wear period Unit of Measure: grams/day Daily uncooked cornstarch intake measured during each device wear period Unit of Measure: grams/day All dietary intakes were assessed by 7-day food diary analyzed with Metadieta® software (Meteda Srl, Italy), completed during CGM monitoring and reviewed by an experienced metabolic dietitian.
Time frame: baseline and after 30 days per device
Assessed using the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS), comprising two subscales: Worry (HFS-W) and Behavior (HFS-B). Each item scored 0-4; total range 0-132; higher scores indicate greater fear of hypoglycemia and more behaviors engaged to avoid hypoglycemic episodes.
Unit of Measure: Score (0-132)
Time frame: baseline and after 30 days per device
Assessed using the Clarke Hypoglycemia Awareness Questionnaire (CHAQ), comprising 8 items on hypoglycemia awareness and recognition. Range 0-7; scores ≥4 indicate impaired awareness of hypoglycemia; higher scores indicate worse hypoglycemia awareness.
Unit of Measure: Score (0-7)
Time frame: Baseline and after 30 days per device
assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a self-report questionnaire assessing sleep quality and disturbances over the previous month. Global score ranges from 0 to 21; scores >5 indicate poor sleep quality; higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
Unit of Measure: Score (0-21)
Time frame: Baseline and after 30 days per device
Assessed using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), yielding Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) standardized scores. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Unit of Measure: Standardized score for Italian population
Time frame: Baseline and after 30 days per device
Height measured at baseline; weight measured at the start and end of each CGM period using a calibrated mechanical scale (Seca 700). BMI calculated as weight (kg)/height² (m²), interpreted according to WHO classification: <18.5 underweight; 18.5-25 healthy weight; 25-30 overweight; >30 obesity.
Unit of Measure: kg/m²
University Hospital Padova
Other
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Alerts, Accuracy, and Patient Outcomes in Adults With Inherited Metabolic Disorders Prone to Hypoglycemia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05687474
3-Hydroxy 3-Methyl Glutaric Aciduria, 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-CoA Lyase Deficiency
Liège, Wallonia, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT05199246
Carbohydrate Metabolism, Inborn Errors, Congenital Myopathy
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05200702
Carbohydrate Metabolism, Inborn Errors, Congenital Myopathy
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04399694
Carbohydrate Metabolism, Inborn Errors, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details