Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01440426

Connective Tissue Graft Versus Mucograft Collagen Matrix for Coverage of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects

This study deals with coverage of multiple denuded roots. The current standard treatment requires surgical correction and uses soft tissue taken from the roof of the mouth to enhance results. The hypothesis of this trial is that a synthetic collagen matrix (called Mucograft) can be used to replace soft tissue taken from the subject. If the collagen matrix will prove to be equally as effective as the patient own tissue, it will be possible to avoid a more extensive surgery and decrease pain and discomfort.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

ICPDOI, Brussels, Belgium

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Objectives The main objective of this study is to assess if the Mucograft Collagen Matrix reduces morbidity, shortens time to recovery and improves patient based outcomes with respect to the use of autologous connective tissue graft harvested from the patient own palate when used to obtain root coverage of multiple adjacent gingival recessions.

The secondary objective is to assess the non-inferiority - in terms of complete root coverage, percentage of root coverage and professional evaluation of aesthetics - of the use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix and autologous connective tissue harvested from the patient's own palate.

Design and Outcomes This will be a parallel group, standard of care-controlled, assessor-blind, randomized, multicenter, multinational, clinical trial.

The statistical design will be a superiority trial in terms of the primary outcomes (patient based outcomes) and non-inferiority trial in terms of the professional outcomes measuring root coverage and aesthetics.

Sample size has been estimated in 140 subjects per treatment arm using a pilot case series analyzed with a multilevel statistical approach and a non inferiority margin of 0.25 mm in recession coverage.

Randomization will be performed by computer generated random codes, using random permuted blocks with a block size of 4 to avoid uneven splits and minimization for the key prognostic factor cigarette smoking. Allocation will be concealed to the surgeons until completion of preparation of the recipient bed by opaque envelopes. A central study registrar will perform patient registration.

Study locations will include academic centers and a practice-based research network in Italy, Switzerland, Germany, Belgium, France, Spain and Greece.

A single examiner, blind with respect to the treatment assignment, will perform all measurements at each center. Trained personnel not involved with the surgical intervention will: i) administer patient questionnaires, ii) provide instructions and collect patient diaries. A single calibrated investigator with specific experience in using the specific score will centrally perform assessment of esthetic scores on standardized digital images.

A biostatistician blind with respect to treatment assignment will perform the analysis.

Interventions and Duration The two intervention groups will consist of surgery with connective tissue graft (standard of care control) and surgery with the application of Mucograft Collagen Matrix (MCM, Test group). Experienced clinicians will deliver treatment consisting of root coverage surgery using coronally advanced flaps, the most utilized procedure for coverage of multiple recessions. Surgery will be standardized and the same procedures/materials will be employed to ensure consistency.

Follow-up of individual patients will be 6 months (to be extended to 3 years if funding will be available)

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 2-4 adjacent gingival recession (one at least 3 mm deep)

Exclusion criteria

  • Interdental attachment loss greater than 1 mm at recession sites

Treatment and study plan

Autologous connective tissue graft with rotated papilla flap

Procedure

Subepithelial connective tissue graft harvested from hard palate

Other names: Subepithelial connective tissue graft

Collagen matrix construct (Mucograft)

Device

Mucograft Collagen Matrix combined with rotated papilla flap

Other names: Mucograft gingival augmentation

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to recovery after surgery

    Time frame: 3 months

    Time to recover after surgery assessed by diary and post'op follow up professional assessment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complete root coverage

    Time frame: 6 months

    Frequency of complete root coverage

  2. Percentage of root coverage

    Time frame: 6 months

    Percentage of the exposed tooth root covered after surgical intervention

  3. Esthetics

    Time frame: 6 months

    Professional assessment by blind assessor of the esthetic result

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Maurizio Tonetti

Network

Collaborators

  • The European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPerio)

Registry information

Official study title

Connective Tissue Graft vs Mucograft Collagen Matrix for Coverage of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Assessing Superiority in Health Related Quality of Life and Non-Inferiority in Root Coverage

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Sep 26, 2011
Registry last updated
Jul 13, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.