Shanna Graves
Birmingham, Alabama, 35578, United States
NCT Number: NCT04864106
Purpose of study: To contrast and compare the Mallampatti test to a comprehensive airway grading test using a rigid 75-degree angle laryngoscope (CPAG) Study Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that the CPAG will have greater sensitivity and specificity for predicting difficulty laryngoscopy as compared to the Mallampati test.
The investigators plan to test this hypothesis by comparing the correlation of (a) airway Mallampati airway grading (predicted airway difficulty) versus (b) CPAG view grading and Cormack Laryngoscopy assessment (observed airway difficulty).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Birmingham, Alabama, 35578, United States
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a comprehensive preoperative airway examination using a 75-degree rigid laryngoscope. (It is important to note that this laryngoscope is routinely used in the speech pathology clinic where patients are not required to provide a written consent because of the limited and non-invasive nature of the examination) The investigators plan to accomplish this by grading a person's airway using a laryngoscopy view and obtain pictures to describe a person's supraglottic airway. The investigators will use these measures to assist the anesthesiologists of the day of surgery with the approach of securing the airway (traditional laryngoscopy versus video-assisted laryngoscopy versus fiberoptic-guided laryngoscopy).
The traditional test and parameters for the assessment of the airway are: The Mallampatti test, the Wilson airway assessment, evaluation of the atlantooccipital joint extension (neck mobility), the thyro-mental distance, the sterno-mental distance, mandibulo-hyoid distance, inter-incisor distance (mouth opening). Other investigators have proposed the use of radiographic assessment methods. These traditional tests are limited by the inability to visualize the posterior pharynx, tongue base, and glottis. Difficulty in intubation can be classified according to the view obtained during direct laryngoscopy into 4 grades. These four grades of laryngoscopic views were defined by Cormack and Lehane. At the present time, no single airway test can provide a high index of sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of a difficult airway. Therefore, it is common practice to use a combination of multiple tests and accept that there is still ambiguity when predicting airway challenges and the best approach to securing an airway.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Endoscopic airway grading using a rigid 75-degree angle laryngoscope.
Time frame: Preoperatively
Cormack-Lehane system- Grading I-IV looking at the Vocal Cords and Epiglottis (1 is less restricted visibility, 4 is most restricted visibility)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06091631
Anesthesia Complication, Anesthesia Intubation Complication
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05383417
Anesthesia Complication, Anesthesia Intubation Complication
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05433155
Anesthesia Intubation Complication, Hypoxemia
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05355974
Anesthesia Intubation Complication, Cardiovascular Diseases
Dayton, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details