Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01186107

Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent vs Sirolimus-Eluting Stent for Diabetic Patients

The purpose of this study is to establish the safety and effectiveness of coronary stenting with the Zotarolimus-Eluting stent compared to the Sirolimus-Eluting stent in the treatment of de novo coronary stenosis in patients with diabetic patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Prospective, two arms, single blind, randomized multi-center trial of 380 patients enrolled at 24 centers in Korea. Following angiography, diabetic patients with significant diameter stenosis >50% by visual estimation have documented myocardial ischemia or symptoms of angina, and eligible for stenting without any exclusion criteria will be randomized 1:1 to: a) Endeavor Resolute stent vs. b) Cypher select. All patients will be followed for at least 1 year. Angiographic follow-up at 9-months is routinely recommended.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diabetic patients with angina and documented ischemia
  • Patients who are eligible for intracoronary stenting
  • De novo lesion
  • Percent diameter stenosis ≥50%
  • Reference vessel size ≥ 2.5 mm by visual estimation

Exclusion criteria

  • History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
  • Pregnant state
  • Known hypersensitivity or contra-indication to contrast agent and heparin
  • Limited life-expectancy (less than 1 year)
  • Acute ST elevation myocardial infarction on admission
  • Characteristics of lesion Left main disease In-stent restenosis Graft vessels
  • Hematological disease (Neutropenia <3000/mm3, Thrombocytopenia <100,000/mm3)
  • Hepatic dysfunction, liver enzyme (ALT and AST) elevation ≥ 3 times normal
  • Renal dysfunction, creatinine ≥ 2.0mg/dL
  • Contraindication to aspirin, clopidogrel or cilostazol
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <30%
  • Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device - investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow- up period.
  • Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy <1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment).

Treatment and study plan

Endeavor Resolute stent

Device

zotarolimus-eluting stent

Cypher stent

Device

sirolimus-eluting stent

Primary outcomes

  1. Angiographic in-segment late loss

    Time frame: 9-month angiographic follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Death (all-cause and cardiac)

    Time frame: at 12 months

  2. myocardial infarction

    Time frame: at 12 months

  3. stent thrombosis

    Time frame: at 12 months

  4. target-lesion revascularization

    Time frame: at 12 months

  5. target-vessel revascularization

    Time frame: at 12 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Seung-Jung Park

Other

Collaborators

  • CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for De Novo Coronary Artery DisEase in Patients With DIABETES Mellitus

Acronym: ESSENCE-DM2

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2013
First posted
Aug 23, 2010
Registry last updated
Jul 29, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.