Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04109794

Comparison of Two Techniques in Gingival Recession Treatment. One-year Clinical Follow-up Study

42 patients were treated either with E-CTG (N=20) or SCAF (N=22). The recordings included clinician-based (recession depth, recession width, probing depth, clinical attachment level, keratinized tissue width, tissue thickness, clinical attachment gain (CAG), root coverage (RC), keratinized tissue change (KTC)) and patient-based (wound healing index (WHI), dentine hypersensitivity (DH), tissue appearance, patient expectations and aesthetics) parameters that were taken at baseline, T1 (sixth week), T2 (sixth month) and T3 (first year).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Gingival Recession Gingival Diseases Mouth Diseases Periodontal Atrophy Periodontal Diseases Stomatognathic Diseases

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • single Miller I GR defects ≤3mm at upper anterior or premolar teeth
  • systemically healthy
  • identifiable cemento-enamel junction (CEJ)
  • PD ≤3 mm

Exclusion criteria

  • periodontal surgery experience in the past two years
  • excessive contacts
  • mobility
  • caries
  • loss of vitality
  • smoking
  • pregnancy

Treatment and study plan

E-CTG

Procedure

Envelope connective tissue graft

Primary outcomes

  1. recession depth

    Time frame: baseline

    Distance between CEJ and GM

  2. recession depth

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Distance between CEJ and GM

  3. recession depth

    Time frame: 6 months

    Distance between CEJ and GM

  4. recession depth

    Time frame: 12 months

    Distance between CEJ and GM

Secondary outcomes

  1. recession width

    Time frame: baseline

    horizontal distance between two borders of recession at CEJ level

  2. recession width

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    horizontal distance between two borders of recession at CEJ level

  3. recession width

    Time frame: 6 months

    horizontal distance between two borders of recession at CEJ level

  4. recession width

    Time frame: 12 months

    horizontal distance between two borders of recession at CEJ level

  5. probing depth

    Time frame: baseline

    distance between GM and base of gingival sulcus

  6. probing depth

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    distance between GM and base of gingival sulcus

  7. probing depth

    Time frame: 6 months

    distance between GM and base of gingival sulcus

  8. probing depth

    Time frame: 12 months

    distance between GM and base of gingival sulcus

  9. clinical attachment level

    Time frame: baseline

    distance between CEJ and base of gingival sulcus

  10. clinical attachment level

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    distance between CEJ and base of gingival sulcus

  11. clinical attachment level

    Time frame: 6 months

    distance between CEJ and base of gingival sulcus

  12. clinical attachment level

    Time frame: 12 months

    distance between CEJ and base of gingival sulcus

  13. keratinized tissue width

    Time frame: baseline

    distance between GM and MGJ

  14. keratinized tissue width

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    distance between GM and MGJ

  15. keratinized tissue width

    Time frame: 6 months

    distance between GM and MGJ

  16. keratinized tissue width

    Time frame: 12 months

    distance between GM and MGJ

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kırıkkale University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Sep 30, 2019
Registry last updated
Sep 30, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.