Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00339183

Comparison of Treatment Effect of Chemotherapy With Panitumumab to Chemotherapy Alone

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the treatment effect of panitumumab plus FOLFIRI compared to FOLFIRI alone as second line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Man or woman at least 18 years old
  • Diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
  • One and only one chemotherapy regimen for mCRC consisting of first-line 5-FU -based chemotherapy
  • Radiologically documented disease progression per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria during treatment or within 6 months of last dose of first-line chemotherapy
  • At least 1 uni-dimensionally measurable lesion of at least 20 mm per modified RECIST
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status of 0, 1, or 2
  • Paraffin-embedded tumor tissue from the primary tumor or metastasis available for central analyses
  • Adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic functions
  • Negative pregnancy test within 72 hours of enrollment
  • Other protocol-specified criteria may apply

Exclusion criteria

  • History of or known presence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases
  • History of another primary cancer within 5 years of randomization
  • Prior irinotecan therapy
  • Prior anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) antibody therapy or treatment with small molecule EGFr inhibitors
  • Any investigational agent or therapy within 30 days before randomization
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to irinotecan, 5-FU or leucovorin
  • History of interstitial lung disease or evidence of interstitial lung disease on baseline chest computed tomography (CT) scan
  • Active inflammatory bowel disease or other bowel disease causing chronic diarrhea
  • Known positive tests for human immunodefiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C viris (HCV), acute or chronic active hepatitis B virus (HBV)
  • Major surgery within 28 days of randomization or minor surgical procedure within 14 days of randomization
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Man or woman of child-bearing potential not consenting to use adequate contraceptive methods or abstinence during the course of the study and for 6 months after last study drug administration (women) or 1 month after last study drug administration (men)
  • Other protocol-specified criteria may apply

Treatment and study plan

Panitumumab

Drug

Panitumumab was administered by IV infusion on Day 1 of each 14-day cycle, just before administration of FOLFIRI chemotherapy.

Other names: Vectibix®

FOLFIRI

Drug

FOLFIRI chemotherapy was initiated on Day 1 of each treatment cycle at the following starting doses: irinotecan 180 mg/m^2, leucovorin 400 mg/m^2 racemate (or 200 mg/m^2 I-leucovorin), 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m^2, 5-FU infusion 2400 mg/m^2.

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 8 April 2008. Maximum follow-up time was 17 months.

    Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to first disease progression per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria or death, based on independent central radiological assessment. Participants who were alive but did not meet criteria for progression by the data cutoff date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date.

    Progressive disease is defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the size of target lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or any new lesions.

  2. Overall Survival

    Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 30 April 2009. Maximum follow-up time was 33 months

    Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. Participants who had not died by the analysis data cutoff date had their time of death censored at their last contact date.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response

    Time frame: Every 8 weeks until disease progression up to the data cut-off date of 30 April 2009. Maximum time on follow-up was 33 months.

    Participants were evaluated for tumor response per the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria every 8 weeks until disease progression. Objective response was defined as the incidence of either a confirmed complete or partial response (CR or PR) while on study, as determined by blinded independent central review and confirmed no less than 4-weeks after the criteria for response are first met. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions and no progression of non-target or no new lesions, or, disappearance of all target lesions and the persistence of ≥ 1 non-target lesion not qualifying for either CR or progressive disease. Participants without a post-baseline assessment were considered non-responders.

  2. Time to Disease Progression

    Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 30 April 2009. Maximum follow-up time was 33 months

    Time to progression was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of first observed disease progression per the modified RECIST criteria. Participants not meeting these criteria by the analysis data cutoff date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date.

    Progressive disease is defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the size of target lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or any new lesions.

  3. Duration of Response

    Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 30 April 2009. Maximum follow-up time was 33 months

    Calculated only for those participants with an objective response as the time from the first objective response (subsequently confirmed within no less than 4 weeks) to first observed disease progression per modified-RECIST criteria. Participants not meeting these criteria by the analysis data cutoff date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date.

    Progressive disease is defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the size of target lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or any new lesions.

  4. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 30 April 2009. Maximum follow-up time was 33 months.

    A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined by regulatory authorities as one that • is fatal • is life threatening (places the subject at immediate risk of death) • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • other significant medical hazard. The relationship of the adverse event to the study treatment was assessed by the Investigator by means of the question: "Is there a reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused by the study treatment?"

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Amgen

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Multicenter Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy of Panitumumab in Combination With Chemotherapy to the Efficacy of Chemotherapy Alone in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2010
First posted
Jun 20, 2006
Registry last updated
Sep 23, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.