Avrasya University
Trabzon, Ortahisar, 61000, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06730165
The aim of this study was to compare the results between transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and trigeminal nerve stimulation with the results obtained from heart rate variability, pulse and blood pressure measurements and to reveal which method is more effective in autonomic nervous system neuromodulation.
Hypotheses of the study:
H0: Vagus nerve stimulation is more effective than trigeminal nerve simulation in terms of heart rate variability.
H1: Trigeminal nerve stimulation is more effective than vagus nerve simulation in terms of heart rate variability.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Trabzon, Ortahisar, 61000, Turkey (Türkiye)
In this study, 80 healthy participants (40 males, 40 females) aged between 20-50 years were randomized (www.randomizer.org) into four groups by computer software. After randomisation, one group was received transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation inside the ear, while the other group was received trigeminal nerve stimulation above the ear.The third group received sham transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation and the fourth group received sham trigeminal nerve simulation. Heart rate variability, pulse rate and blood pressure measurements were performed to determine which stimulation method is more effective. Heart rate variability was analysed with Kubios HRV programme after the 5-minute short measurement method. SNS, PNS and Stress Index and LF, HF and LF/HF parameters were evaluated in heart rate variability sub-parameters.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Stimulation of the vagus nerve through the tragus and concha in the ear
Stimulation of the trigeminal nerve via the auriculotemporal nerve with a clip electrode from the upper auricle
Time frame: Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
5 minutes of heart rate variability was measured.
Time frame: Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure was measured with an electronic blood pressure monitor.
Bahçeşehir University
Other
Comparison of the Effect of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus and Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation on Heart Rate Variability
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07361731
Autonomic Nervous System Imbalance, Behavior
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04886869
Autonomic Nervous System Imbalance
Munich, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT07292623
Autonomic Nervous System Imbalance, Dyskinesias
A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07330700
Autonomic Nervous System Imbalance, Type2 Diabetes Mellitus
Phayao, Thailand
View Trial Details