Semmelweis University Department of Periodontology
Budapest, 1088, Hungary
NCT Number: NCT04896450
The aim is to evaluate in a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study the healing of a GTR procedure, when it is combined with an immediate orthodontic tooth movement or used alone. Clinical, radiological and reentry (histological) evaluation of a regenerative surgical method (GTR + grafting material) with different postsurgical healing patterns in the treatment of wide, non-containing intrabony defects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Budapest, 1088, Hungary
There is limited histological data in literature on the behavior of xenogeneic graft materials in intrabony defects used in periodontal regenerative therapy followed by orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). This clinical study aims to clinically and histologically evaluate the healing response of the periodontal tissues and the healing pattern of a non-resorbable graft material, when they are exposed to orthodontic forces. Therefore teeth presenting non-contained intrabony defects in combination with pathologic tooth migration (PTM) are included in this prospective clinical study. Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with the application of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and a resorbable collagen membrane is utilized to surgically treat the periodontal defects, which is followed by a random allocation of the patients into test or control group. Subject teeth undergo an early initiated orthodontic treatment after surgery or stay splinted without any tooth movement in the latter groups, respectively. Teeth in test group can be further divided into subgroups, depending if they are moved toward to the former defect (pressure site) or moved away from the defect (tension site). After 9 months of healing a reentry surgery is performed, when a biopsy core is removed with a microtrephine from the previous defect site. The sample is evaluated by means of histology supplemented with histomorphometry, which is the primary outcome variable. Periodontal clinical parameters measured at baseline and at 9 months serves for secondary outcomes. Several studies confirmed the success of graft materials in such comprehensive treatment approaches clinically, but we lack the human histologically proved data, whether DBBM bone substitute can be used safely when the tooth is exposed to OTM. Our main question is how orthodontic induced bone remodelling interferes with these graft particles, can they heal the same or even better compared to control sites. Tissue response might be different also in the case of the two test subgroups.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
GTR is handled with the utilization of a coronally advanced flap, followed by a thorough debridement of the denudated root surface and the intrabony component. Regenerative materials are resorbable collagen membrane (BioGide, Geistlich Phara AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (BioOss, Geistlich Phara AG), finally surgery is finished with multilayer suturing technique.
Other names: Regenerative surgery of an intrabony periodontal defect
An early initialization of the tooth movement with the help of a multibond fixed orthodontic device utilizing low level of continuous orthodontic forces.
Other names: Multibond fixed orthodontic appliance
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively
The percentage of newly formed bone of the former periodontal defect after a biopsy harvesting during a reentry surgery 9 months after the GTR intervention
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively
The percentage of graft material (BioOss, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen) of the former periodontal defect after a biopsy harvesting during a reentry surgery 9 months after the GTR intervention
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively
The percentage of connective tissue of the former periodontal defect after a biopsy harvesting during a reentry surgery 9 months after the GTR intervention
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively
Clinical attachment level gain
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively
Pocket probing depth reduction
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively
Change in gingival recession
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively
The absolute fill of the periodontal defect
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively
The change of the crestal bony wall
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively
The change of the intrabony component compared to the initial intrabony defect depth (in percentage)
Semmelweis University
Other
Comparison of the Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) Procedure Alone and in Combination With Immediate Orthodontic Tooth Movement (OTM) in the Treatment of Non-containing and Wide Intrabony Periodontal Defects: a Prospective RCT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07696845
Intrabony Periodontal Defect, Mouth Diseases
Istanbul, Bakırkoy, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04444063
Intrabony Periodontal Defect, Periodontitis Chronic Generalized Severe
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05499598
Intrabony Periodontal Defect
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04971174
Intrabony Periodontal Defect, Mouth Diseases
London, United Kingdom
View Trial Details