Comparison of Routine Endotracheal Intubation With McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Pentax AirwayScope

Recently many kinds of indirect videolaryngoscopes were developed. These videolaryngoscopes provide easier intubation, help intubation difficulty, are used good tool for education. McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Pentax AirwayScope are kinds of these videolaryngoscopes.

The purpose of this study is to compare of routine endotracheal intubation with McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Pentax AirwayScope by means of providing better laryngeal view, easier and faster intubation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Intubation

Age range

19 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Ajou University School of Medicine

Suwon, South Korea

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) 1 or 2

Exclusion criteria

a suspected difficult airway (Mallampati score Ⅳ)
known cervical spine injury
required rapid sequence induction
emergency operation

Treatment and study plan

Pentax Airwayscope

Device

intubation using Pentax Airwayscope

McGrath videolaryngoscope

Device

intubation using McGrath Videolaryngoscope

Primary outcomes

Time to intubation

Time frame: 10 minutes around intubation

from entering of blade between incisors to appearance of first end tidal CO2 curve using capnograph

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ajou University School of Medicine

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start: 2017
Primary completion: 2017
Study completion: 2017
First posted: Dec 20, 2016
Registry last updated: Jun 15, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.

Completed