Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03682315

Comparison of Phicogenic vs. Xenogeneic Biomaterial for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation

The study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological behavior, the histological and morphometrical components, the expression of proteins related to bone formation, and the analysis of markers of reparative mesenchymal stromal cells, after using a biphasic phicogenic biomaterial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone.

A randomized split-mouth clinical study is designed to include patients in need of two-stage bilateral maxillary sinus floor elevation. Patients are assigned to receive a mix of autogenous bone and a biphasic phycogenic biomaterial in one maxillary sinus and a mix of autogenous bone and xenograft bovine hydroxyapatite in the other maxillary sinus. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scans are performed before sinus floor elevation and 6 months after the procedure to assess the bone gain. Bone core biopsies are obtained at the site of implant placement 6 months after the floor elevation. Histological sections are subjected to histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of differentiation markers.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Facultad de Odontología

Granada, 18071, Spain

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Partially edentulous patients.
  • Kennedy class I in the upper jaw.
  • Less than 5 mm of residual crestal bone to the maxillary sinus.
  • Need for the replacement of teeth with dental implants.

Exclusion criteria

  • Sinus pathology (sinusitis, mucocele, cysts).
  • Smokers.
  • Previous long-term (>3 months) use of drugs known to affect bone metabolism, such as bisphosphonates.

Treatment and study plan

Biphasic phycogenic biomaterial

Device

Maxillary sinus floor elevation and bone grafting with the use of biphasic phycogenic biomaterial combined with autogenous cortical bone

Xenograft bovine hydroxyapatite

Device

Maxillary sinus floor elevation and bone grafting with the use of xenograft bovine hydroxyapatite combined with autogenous cortical bone

Primary outcomes

  1. Sinus floor height change

    Time frame: From surgery to 6 months

    CBCT scans are performed before the sinus floor elevation and 6 months later before implant placement to calculate vertical bone height change from the crestal bone to the floor of the maxillary sinus

Secondary outcomes

  1. Area of new mineralized tissue

    Time frame: 6 months

    Histomorphometric quantification of new mineralized tissue in a bone biopsy collected 6 months after the grafting procedure

  2. Area of non-mineralized tissue

    Time frame: 6 months

    Histomorphometric quantification of non-mineralized tissue in a bone biopsy collected 6 months after the grafting procedure

  3. Area of remaining graft particles

    Time frame: 6 months

    Histomorphometric quantification of remaining graft particles in a bone biopsy collected 6 months after the grafting procedure

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universidad de Granada

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Algae-derived Hydroxyapatite Behaviour as Bone Biomaterial in Comparison to Anorganic Bovine Bone. A Randomised Split-mouth Human Study.

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Sep 24, 2018
Registry last updated
May 23, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.