Ramosetron
DrugRamosetron 0.3 mg was mixed to the PCA. Same dose of drug was administered 10 minutes before the end of surgery according to the allocated group.
NCT Number: NCT01825733
Postoperative pain, the great concern for the patients undergoing spine surgery, has led to common use of opioid-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) postoperatively. Opioid-based IV-PCA offers better pain control, which could facilitate early recovery, rehabilitation and increase patient satisfaction. However, its use inevitably increases the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), another great discomfort, as high as 80% in patients with multiple risk factors.Therefore, there have been consistent efforts to prevent PONV with multimodal therapies such as risk stratification, modification and preventive use of antiemetics.
Of all antiemetics, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) antagonist, especially ondansetron, is most commonly used and extensively studied to reduce PONV because of its efficacy and fewer side effects.[8] However, its efficacy is not quite satisfactory when it comes to PONV associated with opioid-based IV-PCA. Recently, there are many reports comparing the antiemetic efficacy between ondansetron and the 2 newly developed 5-HT3 antagonists, ramosetron and palonosetron. Ramosetron is known to have a higher affinity and longer duration of binding to 5-HT3 receptor, therefore exhibits potent and sustained anti-emetic effect than previously developed 5-HT3 antagonists.Palonosetron has a unique allosteric binding to the 5-HT3 receptor, which brings a higher affinity, longer duration of action and longer elimination half-time.According to the previous studies, both ramosetron and palonosetron showed superior antiemetic efficacy for PONV associated with opioid-based IV-PCA to ondansetron as expected by their theoretical advantages. However, it has never been evaluated which one has superior antiemetic efficacy for opioid-based IV-PCA associated PONV. Therefore, in this study, we tried to evaluate the relative antiemetic efficacy of ramosetron and palonosetron in controlling opioid-based IV-PCA related PONV.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Ramosetron 0.3 mg was mixed to the PCA. Same dose of drug was administered 10 minutes before the end of surgery according to the allocated group.
palonosetrno 0.075 mg was mixed to the PCA. Same dose of drug was administered 10 minutes before the end of surgery according to the allocated group.
Time frame: change of antiemetic efficacy for 5 time points ( postanesthesia care unit, 0-6 h, 6-24 h, 24-48 h, 48-72 h after operation)
At each time point, frequency and intensity (verbal numeric scale, 0-10, 0: no nausea, 10: maximum) of nausea, frequency of vomiting, rescue antiemetic use were recorded and compared between groups.
Yonsei University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06546514
Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders
Erzurum, Palandöken, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05676294
Nausea, Pathologic Processes
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07688811
Anesthesia Complication, Nausea
Jakarta Pusat, Jakarta Special Capital Region, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT07242209
Menstrual Cycle, Nausea
Sakarya, Serdivan, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details