Comparison of NOSE and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Right Colon Surgery

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) is an accepted surgical procedure for several right sided colonic pathologies. Recently the advantages of the intracorporeal ileotransversostomy over the extracorporeal anastomosis is appearing in the literature. Additionally, specimen extraction through the natural orifices is an emerging method when combined with the totally laparoscopic procedures. Our observations on natural orifice surgery was promising . In our daily surgical practice, investigators prefer the intracorporeal anastomosis and this study was conducted to compare the specimen extraction sites after LRH. Here investigators aimed to compare the results of conventional and natural orifice specimen extractions (NOSE) after totally LRHs.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Surgical Incision Surgical Wound Wounds and Injuries

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Inonu University

Malatya, 44090, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

compare the patient-selected NOSE method and conventional method in laparoscopic right colon cancer surgery

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

laparoscopic right hemicolectomy patients

Exclusion criteria

Treatment and study plan

natural orifice

Procedure

laparoscopic right colon surgery and patients who are removed from the natural orifice and conventional will gather

Other names: conventional

Primary outcomes

VAS control

Time frame: 6 years

Visual Analog Score for pain (1-10 score)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Inonu University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start: 2013
Primary completion: 2019
Study completion: 2019
First posted: Apr 4, 2018
Registry last updated: Oct 14, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.

Completed