Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06392737

Comparison of MRI Artificial Intelligence-guided cTB Versus Routine cTB in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

The goal of this multicenter clinical trial is to compare the cancer detection rates of MRI artificial intelligence-guided cTB (AI-cTB) and routine cTB, and explore the added value of using AI for the guidance of cTB. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does AI-cTB promote the accurate diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer? What's the value of prostate MRI artificial intelligence assistant diagnosis system in developing the best scheme of prostate biopsy? What's the value of prostate MRI artificial intelligence assistant diagnosis system in predicting the pathological results of prostate targeted biopsy? What's the generalizability of the MRI artificial intelligence assistant diagnosis system?

Researchers will compare the cancer detection rates of AI-cTB and routine cTB to explore the added value of using AI for the guidance of cTB.

Participants will:

Receive AI-cTB or routine cTB.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

45 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Peking University First Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100034, China

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Baowei Zhang

CONTACT

[email protected]

+86 83572466

About this study

Cognitive fusion MRI-guided targeted biopsy (cTB) has been widely used in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). However, cTB relies heavily on the operator's experience and confidence in MRI readings. Our previously single-center RCT has demonstrated the effectiveness of accurately detecting clinically significant PCa (csPCa). The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the cancer detection rates of MRI artificial intelligence-guided cTB (AI-cTB) and routine cTB, and explore the added value of using AI for the guidance of cTB. This multicenter RCT aims to further validate the ability of MRI artificial intelligence in different institutions and investigate the generalizability of the MRI artificial intelligence assistant diagnosis system.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does AI-cTB promote the accurate diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer? What's the value of prostate MRI artificial intelligence assistant diagnosis system in developing the best scheme of prostate biopsy? What's the value of prostate MRI artificial intelligence assistant diagnosis system in predicting the pathological results of prostate targeted biopsy? What's the generalizability of the MRI artificial intelligence assistant diagnosis system? This multicenter RCT compared the csPCa detection rates of the AI-cTB and routine cTB. Participants were prospectively enrolled at Peking University First Hospital (Beijing, China), Beijing Miyun District Hospital (Beijing, China), and Shanghai East Hospital (Shanghai, China) from May 2024 to April 2025.

Participants were randomly allocated to AI-cTB group and routine cTB group. Researchers will compare the cancer detection rates of AI-cTB and routine cTB to explore the added value of using AI for the guidance of cTB.

Participants will:

Receive AI-cTB or routine cTB.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The age of the patient is between 45 and 85.
  • Patients with complete multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) data, qualified image quality control, suspicious lesions, and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS V2.1) of ≥ 3.
  • Patients were in accordance with the indication of prostate biopsy, including patients with suspicious prostate nodes found by digital rectal examination (DRE), the suspicious lesions found by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) or MRI, total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) >10ng/mL, tPSA 4-10ng/mL with free-to-total PSA ratio (f/tPSA) <0.16 or PSA density (PSAD) >0.15.
  • Patients were in accordance with the indication of repeated prostate biopsy (patients with atypical acinar hyperplasia or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, especially when the pathological results of multi-needle puncture were as above; re-examination of PSA > 10 ng/ml; re-examination of PSA 4~10ng/ml, abnormal f/tPSA, abnormal PSAD, abnormal DRE, or imaging abnormalities; for patients with the results of re-examination of PSA 4~10ng/ml and with close follow-up, PSA for 2 consecutive years > 10ng/ml or PSA volume > 0.75/ml/years). The time interval between the two prostate biopsies should be longer than three months.
  • The targeted prostate biopsy pathological results of above lesions were complete. The time interval between targeted prostate biopsy and prostate mpMRI examination should not exceed one month.
  • Patients with complete clinical information.

Exclusion criteria

  • The mpMRI data was unqualified or incomplete.
  • Patients had received radiotherapy, chemotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, or surgery treatment before prostate mpMRI examination or prostate biopsy.
  • The mpMRI did not find suspicious prostate lesions.
  • Patients were not in accordance with the indication of prostate biopsy or were not received systematic biopsy combined with targeted biopsy.
  • The patients could not cooperate to complete the systematic biopsy combined with targeted biopsy. The patients or their family members refused to participate in this study.
  • Patients with incomplete clinical information.

Treatment and study plan

MRI-AI guided cognitive prostate targeted biopsy

Procedure

Before prostate biopsy, the MR images of patients in the AI-cTB group were uploaded to the AI software. Then the images with suspicious lesions highlighted by AI software were viewed by urologists. Biopsies were performed under the guidance of TRUS through the transrectal or transperineal route.

Routine cognitive prostate targeted biopsy

Procedure

Before prostate biopsy, the MR images and reports were viewed by urologists preceding the biopsy. Biopsies were performed under the guidance of TRUS through the transrectal or transperineal route.

Primary outcomes

  1. The clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rate for targeted biopsy (TB) and TB combined with systematic biopsy (SB)

    Time frame: One month after the biopsy procedure.

    csPCa was defined as PCa with a grade group > 2 or GS ≥ 7. The reference standard was the pathological results of the combination of TB (AI-cTB or cTB) and SB.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The PCa detection rate

    Time frame: One month after the biopsy procedure.

    The PCa detection rate for targeted biopsy (TB) and TB combined with systematic biopsy (SB).

  2. The Gleason score (GS) of the biopsy sample

    Time frame: One month after the biopsy procedure.

    The Gleason score was reported by senior uropathologists according to the Standards of Reporting for MRI Targeted Biopsy Studies (START) criteria and interpreted according to the recommendations of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group.

  3. The GS of radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens

    Time frame: One month after the biopsy procedure.

    The overall grade was assigned based on the part with the highest Gleason score according to the recommendations of the ISUP

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Peking University First Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of MRI Artificial Intelligence-guided Cognitive Fusion-targeted Biopsy Versus Routine Cognitive Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Apr 30, 2024
Registry last updated
Jul 2, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.