Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06146244

Comparison of ISQ in Implants Placed in Antral Area on Native Bone vs Regenerated Bone

Compare ISQ values of implants placed in antral area in native bone vs regenerated bone with a follow-up at 3 months to compare values changes.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Implant Site Reaction

Age range

23 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Dental Clinic of the UEM

Madrid, 28045, Spain

About this study

The stability of dental implants is influenced by the type of bone in which the implant is placed. Native bone tends to provide better initial stability due to its density and quality, while regenerated bone, it is logical to think that it may present less stability due to the quality of the generated bone and the presence of defects in the treated area.

In this study it has been observed that after 3 months more stability is observed in the antral area, measured in ISQ resonance frequency in implants on regenerated bone, which surprises us and this result is explained in detail in said study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients
  • Total superior edentulism or antral zone edentulism
  • Accepted study and signed inform consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients under 23 years old
  • Non accepted study or signed inform consent

Treatment and study plan

sinus lift

Procedure

Implant placement on grafted sinus vs antral autogenous bone

Other names: alveolar preservation

resonance frequency analysis

Device

analysis of the ISQ evolution and its changes after 3 months of placing the implant in native or regenerated bone, always in the antral area

Other names: ISQ

Primary outcomes

  1. Resonance frequency analysis (ISQ) measurements

    Time frame: 3 months

    The day of surgery, data were collected by vestibular and palatal, in addition, the mean of both measurements was taken and ISQ data were collected vertically to complete all the information. After 3 months of implant placement we recorded the same measurements and compared them in native and regenerated bone.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Insertion torque measurements

    Time frame: During implant placement

    Analysis of the insertion torque values measured in Newtons per centimeter (Ncm) and comparing the results of both groups.

  2. Changes in the marginal bone

    Time frame: 3 months

    Analysis of the changes in the marginal bone three months after implant placement

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

European University of Madrid

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison Between Value of Resonance Frequency Analysis (ISQ) in Implants Placed in Antral Area on Native Bone vs Value Obtained in Implants Placed in Antral Area on Regenerated Bone and Its Evolution After 3 Months

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Nov 24, 2023
Registry last updated
Nov 24, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.