Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01474252

Comparison of Intubation Duration Between Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) Technique and Non-RSI Technique

The purpose of this study is to evaluate intubation duration between rapid sequence intubation technique (RSI) and non-rapid sequence intubation technique (non-RSI) performed by emergency medicine residents in Siriraj hospital.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Tracheal Intubation Morbidity

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Siriraj Hospital

Bangkok, 10700, Thailand

About this study

A prospective cohort study was conducted in the non-traumatic emergency department (ED).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients required airway control by tracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

  • cardiac arrest

Treatment and study plan

RSI

Drug

All medications are administered only one dose before intubation

Anesthetics:

Propofol 2-2.5 mg/kg Thiopental 3-5mg/kg Etomidate 1-2mg/kg

Neuromuscular blocking agents:

Succinylcholine 1-1.5mg/kg Rocuronium 0.9mg/kg

Opioid:

Fentanyl 1-2ug/kg

Other names: Rapid Sequence Intubation

Primary outcomes

  1. The overall intubation duration

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the overall intubation duration until confirmation the endotracheal position, an expected average of 2 minutes

    The overall intubation duration is recorded on the decision to intubation patient and corresponds to the time of confirmation the endotracheal position by chest auscultation

Secondary outcomes

  1. the intubation duration

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the intubation duration until confirmation the endotracheal position, an expected average of 5 minutes

    The intubation duration (Ti), it is defined from application the laryngoscope into the patient's mouth to the time of confirmation an endotracheal position

  2. Complication

    Time frame: Participants will be followed in the period of staying in the emergency room and hospital, an expected average of 4 weeks

    Complications occur during and after intubation peroid are recorded and monitored until patients are discharged fromt the hospital.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Siriraj Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Intubation Duration Between Rapid Sequence Intubation Technique and Non- Rapid Sequence Intubation Technique in Siriraj Hospital by Emergency Medicine Residences

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2013
First posted
Nov 18, 2011
Registry last updated
Jun 2, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.