Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05991375

Comparison of Efficacy of Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Block With or Without Dexmedetomidine

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are coming for Brachial vein transposition surgery. Patients were randomly allocated using sealed opaque envelope bearing A- (Injection bupivacaine (0.25%) 28 ml plus 2 ml. normal saline) and B-Injection bupivacaine (0.25%) 28 mL plus dexmedetomidine I ug/kg diluted to 2 ml).

Supraclavicular block under ultrasound and nerve stimulator guidance was performed.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Syed Muhammad Abbas

Karachi, Sindh, 74200, Pakistan

About this study

This study was conducted after approval of the institutional ethical review committee and then from College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. Patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) coming for Brachial vein transposition surgery, and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. All patients were instructed not to consume solid food after midnight prior to surgery. A brief history of demographic data was taken from each patient. Each participant's height in meters was measured using wall mounted scale, weight in kg using a weighing machine, and BMI kg/m² was noted prior to operation. The findings of quantitative variables (age, height, weight, sensory blockade, motor blockade and qualitative variables (gender, diabetes mellitus type II, hypertension, and dyslipidemia) were entered in the proforma attached as an annexure. Patients were randomly allocated using sealed opaque envelope bearing A- (Injection bupivacaine (0.25%) 28 ml plus 2 ml. normal saline) and B-Injection bupivacaine (0.25%) 28 mL plus dexmedetomidine I ug/kg diluted to 2 ml). Only the anaesthesiologists for the specific case were aware of the treatment allocation until the end of the surgical procedure. The investigator for assessing the block and the other outcome variables, remained blinded to the patient's group allocation.

Routine monitoring of heart rate & rhythm by ECG, and arterial blood pressure using non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) including systolic, diastolic & mean arterial blood pressure, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SPO2) using a pulse oximeter was performed on each patient. The supraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed under the supervision of a consultant anaesthesiologist in a supine position with a head up to 45 degrees. An Intravenous (IV) line was established and the skin was disinfected and a linear probe, high frequency 12 MHz was placed firmly over the supraclavicular fossa, the probe was positioned in the transverse plane immediately superior to the clavicle at approximately its midpoint. The probe was tilted caudally to obtain a cross sectional view of the subclavian artery. The brachial plexus was seen as a collection of hypo-echoic oval structures lateral and superficial to the artery. Using a 25 gauge needle 1 to 2 ml of 2% lidocaine was locally infiltrated into the skin 1 cm lateral to the probe to decrease the discomfort during needle insertion. A 50 mm or 80 mm length, short bevel, insulated nerve stimulator needle was used. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is an additional way of confirming nerve location. Initial settings was set at 0.5 mA current, 2 Hz frequency, and pulse width of 0.1 milliseconds. Close approximation to the divisions of brachial plexus was confirmed by getting nerve stimulation on 0.3 mA current. The needle was advanced along the long axis in the same plane as the ultrasound beam. The shaft and tip was visualized in real time as the needle was advanced towards the target nerves. The drug in either group was injected under direct vision of ultrasound beams and by confirming with nerve stimulation. Sensory blockade and motor blockade was assessed every 3 minutes. Time of onset of sensory and motor blockade and duration of sensory and motor blockade were noted as per operational definition. Postoperative pain was assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients were asked to mark a point on the line that matches the intensity of pain on the Visual Analogue Score hourly for 4 hours post operatively. Those patients having arm pain equal to or greater than 4 on VAS, were given rescue analgesic (inj. Paracetamol (15mg/kg 1/V) and duration of analgesia were noted as per operational definition.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic renal failure patients who will undergo elective basilic vein transposition surgery
  • Either gender
  • ASA III
  • Age 18-65 years.

Exclusion criteria

  • Mentally challenged
  • Pregnancy.
  • Hypersensitivity to bupivacaine or dexmedetomidine
  • Seizures
  • Neck swelling (hematoma, lipoma, tumor, thyroid)
  • Neuromuscular dystrophy
  • Bleeding disorders

Treatment and study plan

Dexmedetomidine

Drug

28 mL of Bupivacain 0.25% was mixed with Dexmedetomidine 1 microgram/kg body weight mixed in 2 mL = total volume 30 mL

Other names: DEX

Saline

Other

28 mL of Bupivacain 0.25% was mixed with 2 mL of Normal saline = total volume 30 mL

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain score

    Time frame: 0-4 hours

    Visual Analogue Scale for pain

    0-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10

    Pain score 0 means no pain, Pain score 1 to 3 means mild pain, Pain score 4-6 means moderate pain, Pain score 7-9 means severe pain, Pain score 10 means most excruciating pain one can have,

  2. Heart rate

    Time frame: 0-4 hours

    Heart rate as per vitals monitoring device

  3. Mean blood pressure

    Time frame: 0-4 hours

    as measured by non-invasive blood pressure monitoring device

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Comparative Evaluation Of The Effects Of Dexmedetomidine As An Adjuvant With Bupivacaine In Supraclavicular Block In Chronic Renal Failure Patients Undergoing Basilic Vein Transposition Surgery

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Aug 14, 2023
Registry last updated
Aug 14, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.