Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02207738

Comparison of Efficacy Between Fractional Microneedling Radiofrequency and Bipolar Radiofrequency for Acne Scar

Compare the efficacy and safety profile of microneedling radiofrequency and that of bipolar radiofrequency treatment for acne scar.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

19 year–40 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine

Seoul, 110-744, South Korea

About this study

Efficacy and safety of microneedling radiofrequency for acne scar Efficacy and safety bipolar radiofrequency treatment for acne scar compare the efficacy and safety profile of microneedling radiofrequency and that of bipolar radiofrequency treatment for acne scar

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • moderate acne scar
  • mild to moderate acne lesions

Exclusion criteria

  • taking acne medication oral drugs within 2 months topical drugs within 2 weeks
  • taken anu procedures for acne scar within 6 months
  • taking steroid,nonsteroidal antiinflammtory drugs, isotretinoin
  • underlying diabetes mellitus, keloid, or any malignancy

Treatment and study plan

microneedling radiofrequency device

Device

Microneedling radiofrequency device is composed of 49 insulated microneedle which emit radiofrequency from the needle tip. This radiofreqeuncy generates dermal heat which evokes biological effect.

Other names: INFINI(Lutronics, Goyang, Korea)

bipolar radiofrequency

Device

bipolar radiofrequency instrument gives out bipolar radiofrequency from the hand piece tip. This bipolar radiofrequency generates dermal heat which has a lot of bilogical effect.

Other names: Polaris(syneron, israel)

Primary outcomes

  1. Global assessment of acne scar

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    5-point grading of acne scar quartile assessment of acne scar improvement through comparing the photos taken before treatment and after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. ECCA

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    quantitative assessment of acne scar ECCA assessment is established by previous article. this method quantifies severity of acne scar by counting the number of acne scar categorized by their shape. Then, the number of scars are multiplied by weighing factors determined by scar types. ECCA is the total sum of these points. please refer the Dreno et al, Dermatology, 2007;214:46-51

  2. Adverse effect

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    adverse effects were measured by Epithelization Scale. ES is the total sum of evaluation of three components after wounding. please refer this article Min et al, Wound Repair and Regen, 2014;22(2):212-9

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety Between Fractional Microneedling Radiofrequency and Bipolar Radiofrequency Treatment for Acne Scar

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Aug 4, 2014
Registry last updated
Aug 4, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.