NCT Number: NCT00752635
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Norgestimate-ethinyl Estradiol and Cyproterone Acetate-ethinyl Estradiol in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol as comparted with cyproterone acetate-ethinyl estradiol among female patients with moderate acne vulgaris.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
15 year–49 year
Sex eligibility
Female
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
About this study
This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TriCilest as comparted with Diane-35 among female patients with moderate acne vulgaris. The study design was double-blind, randomized, parallel and active controlled. The sponsor planned to recruit approximately 50 patients to complete 40 evaluable patients. At the end of the study, a total of 48 patients were randomized.
TriCilest (noregestimate-ethinyl estradiol), 0.18mg-0.035mg or 0.215mg-0.035mg or 0.25mg-0.035mg, Oral admistration, The duration was three consecutive menstrual cycles.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Female adults who were suffering from moderate acne vulgaris (grade II or III)
- With 6 to 100 comedones (non-inflammatory lesions)
- With 10 to 50 inflammatory lesions (papules or pustules)
- With fewer than 5 nodules
- Agree to condoms or diaphragm, and spermicide or any other medically approved effective barrier method of contraceptive or a nonhormonal IUD
- Agree to take as treatment for acne only for the supplied study drug during the three month treatment phase
- Documented by an informed consent to participate in the trial on the day before entering the study
Exclusion criteria
- Patients who, in the investigator's opinion, cannot understand or follow the instructions given in the study
- Who are pregnant or nursing
- Who have clinical depression and are suicidal or require immediate treatment for depression
- Who have a known hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients
- Who are currently having significant adverse experiences from ethinyl estradiol or norgestimate
- Who have any coexisting medical condition or are taking and concomitant to a medication that is likely to interfere with safe administration of TriCilest and/or Diane-35, in the investigator's opinion
- Who take systemic retinoids, systemic antimicrobials, and topical acne treatments within 6 months, 1 month, and 2 weeks prior to enrollment, respectively
- Who have any of the following contraindications to oral contraceptives: Current thrombophlebitis or thromboembolic disorders, or past history of deep vein thrombophlebitis or thromboembolic disorder, or cerebral vascular or coronary artery disease or known severe hypertension, or diabetes with vascular involvement, or known or suspected carcinoma of the breast, or known or suspected estrogen-dependent neoplasia, or undiagnosed, abnormal genital bleeding, or benign or malignant liver tumor, or have jaundice or severe liver disease, or neurovascular lesion of the eye or serious visual disturbances, or known allergic reaction or sensitivities to TriCilest or Diane 35
- Who have taken an investigational medication within 30 days prior to enter study (or within a period of five times its half-life or the half-life of its metabolites)
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
The primary efficacy variable was the change form baseline to the latest available evaluation in total lesion count. The primary efficacy result of this study clearly manifested the potency of TriCilest.
Secondary outcomes
-
The secondary efficacy variable (change in lesion counts) showed consistent results to the primary efficacy endpoint.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Johnson & Johnson Taiwan Ltd
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Tricilest (Norgestimate-ethinyl Estradiol) and Diane-35 (Cyproterone Acetate-ethinyl Estradiol) in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
Important dates
- Study start
- 2004
- Study completion
- 2005
- First posted
- Sep 15, 2008
- Registry last updated
- May 19, 2011
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of BF-200 ALA (Ameluz®) and BF-RhodoLED® in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acne Vulgaris With Photodynamic Therapy in Adults
NCT05080764
Acne Vulgaris, Acneiform Eruptions
Fountain Valley, California, United States
View Trial DetailsAI-Generated Acne Vulgaris Learning Material Study
NCT07652112
Acne Vulgaris, Acneiform Eruptions
Kayseri, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsA Study to Evaluate the Reduction in Sebum (Skin Oil) Induced by Clascoterone Cream 1% in Acne Patients
NCT06415279
Acne Vulgaris, Acneiform Eruptions
High Point, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsRandomized, Triple-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Trial of Topical Dapsone Gel 7.5% in Patients With Acne Vulgaris
NCT07244887
Acne Vulgaris, Acneiform Eruptions
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details