Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00986050

Comparison of Drug Eluting and Bare Metal Stents With or Without Abciximab in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

The DEBATER study is designed to determine the superiority of abciximab over no abciximab and to determine the superiority of drug eluting stents over bare metal stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Catharina ziekenhuis

Eindhoven, North Brabant, Netherlands

About this study

In patients with acute myocardial infarction primary PCI without prior thrombolytic therapy, is the treatment of choice.

The recommendation for routine stenting in PCI is based on 4 studies that have demonstrated the usefulness of bare metal stents in patients with STEMI. However this recommendation cannot be extrapolated (yet) to the use of drug eluting stents. Although DES have been used widely in unstable angina and in acute myocardial infarction, to date there are no evidence-based recommendations to support the routine use of DES in STEMI.

GPI have been studied extensively in patients with non-STsegment elevation myocardial infarctions (NSTEMI) with planned or performed PCI. In STEMI tirofiban and and eptifibatide are less well investigated, and only abciximab is recommended in primary PCI, but the long term benefits require more investigation. In PCI randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT's) abciximab consistently showed a significant reduction in the rate of myocardial infarction and the need for urgent revascularization. Abciximab has been evaluated in 5 RCT's in association with primary PCI. The pooled analysis for the clinical outcome at 30 days, demonstrate a significant reduction of death, re- infarction and target vessel revascularization (TVR), mainly due to a reduction of repeat intervention. The long-term benefits require more investigation.

The DEBATER trial is designed to answer the questions about the need for abciximab and about the use of DES in primary PCI.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • STEMI ≤ 12 hours (or STEMI equivalent).
  • No contra - indications for primary PCI.
  • No contra - indications for abciximab.
  • Informed consent from the patient.

Exclusion criteria

  • Contra - indication for primary PCI: History of peripheral/coronary artery disease that is inaccessible for angiography or PCI.
  • Contra - indications for GPI: Ongoing bleeding, bleeding diathesis, cerebrovascular accident < 6 months, major surgery/trauma < 6 months, platelet count < 100.000 mm3 , intracranial arteriovenous malformation or neoplasm, malignant hypertension, INR >1.5, severe hepatic dysfunction
  • Contra - indications for clopidogrel:
  • Severe liver dysfunction, pathological bleeding disorders such as peptic ulcer or intracranial bleeding.
  • Thrombolytic therapy < 24 hours.
  • Therapy with GPI < 24 hours.
  • Anticoagulation therapy.
  • Co - morbid conditions with a predictable fatal outcome in the short run.
  • No informed consent: refusal, coma, artificial respiration, impaired mentation.

Treatment and study plan

Abciximab

Drug

Abciximab bolus 0,25mg/kg, 10-60 minutes before PCI. Infusion 0,125ug/kg/min for 12 hours after PCI.

Other names: reopro

bare metal stent prokinetic, chrono, skylor or bluemedical

Device

bare metal stent in culprit artery in acute myocardial infarction

Other names: operator-dependent: prokinetic, chrono, skylor, bluemedical

drug eluting stent (sirolimus eluting) - CYPHER stent

Device

stent implantation in culprit artery in acute myocardial infarction

Other names: CYPHER stent

Primary outcomes

  1. target vessel failure

    Time frame: 30 days and one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Major adverse cardiac and cerebral adverse events ( MACCE)

    Time frame: 30 days and one year

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven

Other

Collaborators

  • Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
  • CATHREINE ( data monitoring)
  • Compusense Oegstgeest ( electronic randomization and CRF)

Registry information

Official study title

A Comparison of Drug Eluting and Bare Metal Stents With or Without Abciximab in ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction The Eindhoven Reperfusion Study

Acronym: DEBATER

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2009
First posted
Sep 29, 2009
Registry last updated
Jul 26, 2011

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.