University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07669714
This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) and implant removal/replacement methods used in the treatment of fracture-related infections, and to determine the infection-free fracture healing rates and the factors affecting treatment success.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)
Fracture-related infection remains one of the most challenging musculoskeletal complications in orthopedic trauma surgery. Its diagnosis is a multi-stage process based on various diagnostic criteria. The international consensus definition of fracture-related infection was standardized in 2018, and this definition has been reinforced with updates in subsequent years. The recently validated consensus definition of fracture-related infection offers clinicians the opportunity to standardize clinical reports and improve the quality of published literature. The consensus definition definitively indicates the presence of infection [confirmatory criteria; (1) fistula/sinus tract/incision site dehiscence, (2) purulent drainage during surgery, (3) growth of the same pathogen in ≥2 separate deep tissue/implant cultures] or possibly indicates the presence of infection [suggestive criteria; The diagnostic criteria are based on (1) local pain, redness, increased heat, (2) wound exudation, (3) fever, (4) elevated CRP and ESR, (5) implant loosening, osteolysis, non-union. The presence of suggestive criteria should raise suspicion of infection, and further investigation should be conducted. The presence of at least one confirmatory sign is associated with high diagnostic performance and is pathognomonic for the presence of fracture-related infection. This definition also guides the treatment of fracture-related infections. Fracture-related infections are a significant complication causing high morbidity in orthopedic trauma surgery. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of DAIR and implant removal/replacement methods used in the treatment of fracture-related infections, and to determine the infection-free fracture healing rates and the factors affecting treatment success.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
DAIR: Debridement, antibiotic retention and implant removal
implant removal/replacement
Time frame: 1 year
Infection-free fracture healing rates
Time frame: 1 year
Infection recurrence rate
Time frame: 1 year
Time to union
Antalya Health Sciences University
Other
COMPARISON OF DEBRIDEMENT, ANTIBIOTIC, IMPLANT RETENTION (DAIR) AND IMPLANT EXCHANGE IN EARLY-STAGE FRACTURE-RELATED INFECTIONS: A RETROSPECTİVE COHORT STUDY
Acronym: DAIR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05697835
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02278627
Orthopedic Surgery
Limoges, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07389551
Orthopedic Surgery
Bahawalpur, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT04335968
Confusion, Delirium
Clichy-sous-Bois, France
View Trial Details