IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, 40136, Italy
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06122727
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most common surgery in North America and the second most common in Europe. One of the most critical issues for stability and durability of the interventional is the prosthesis-bone geometric fit, where a required a perfect match; the recent availability of custom 3D implants can overcome this problem. In order to further improve a TKA surgery, it is in fact, it is possible today to completely customize the procedure for each individual patient, with cost and time now accessible. This intervention can be performed with the use of instrumentation specific to the patient (so-called resin 'cutting templates' referred to as PSI, "Patient Specific Instrumentation") to make cuts accurate bone cuts in accordance with a specific 3D preoperative plan . Also the design and fabrication in of the components prosthetic components themselves, in metal and polyethylene, is done by means of 3D printing. Based on the unique anatomy of each patient, the precise sagittal orientation and axial rotation of the components of the prosthesis customized for the surgeon, it is possible to plan and perform the surgery quickly and in accordance with the exact specifications of the individual patient. These procedures should also make it possible to greatly reduce the instrumentation and the sizes that need to be available in the operating room, reducing time and costs associated with transportation and storage . The objective of this study is to compare primary TKAs performed with a customized procedure (prostheses customized for each patient based on his or her reconstructed knee morphology by tomographic scans, and implanted via cutting guides customized for the patient) with standard primary TKAs, considering: the objective radiological results, the subjective results of the patients and the costs of both procedures.
Interested in participating?
Request Info40 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bologna, 40136, Italy
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
In detail, in the STANDARD group, patients will undergo a primary TKR by implanting a prosthetic model of the same standard design for all using the usual surgical technique and instrumentation (based on the use of guide intramedullary of femur and extramedullary of tibia); in the PERSONALIZED group, patients will undergo a primary TKA by implanting a prosthetic model (YourKnee, Rejoint) with design based specifically on each patient's actual knee morphology and using PSI surgical technique and instrumentation. In both groups, the approach of the basic prosthetic design base will be of the Cruciate-Retaining (CR) type with congruent polyethylene (PE), with standard and customized for the STANDARD and CUSTOM group, respectively.
Time frame: at baseline (day 0)
Evaluate by how many degrees the angle HKA (angle obtained by joining the center of rotation of the knee with that of the hip and ankle) planned (desired value) differs from that measured postoperatively (obtained value) When implanting a customized primary TKA (PERSONALIZED group) vs. a standard primary TKA (STANDARD group) according to normal surgical practice.
Time frame: 12 months
Evaluate by how many degrees the angle HKA (angle obtained by joining the center of rotation of the knee with that of the hip and ankle) planned (desired value) differs from that measured postoperatively (obtained value) When implanting a customized primary TKA (PERSONALIZED group) vs. a standard primary TKA (STANDARD group) according to normal surgical practice.
Time frame: at baseline (day 0)
The VAS scale is an objective method of pain measurement
Time frame: after 3 months
The VAS scale is an objective method of pain measurement
Time frame: after 6 months
The VAS scale is an objective method of pain measurement
Time frame: after 12 months
The VAS scale is an objective method of pain measurement
Time frame: after 24 months
The VAS scale is an objective method of pain measurement
Time frame: at baseline (Day 0)
The KSS contains questions in 2 sections: knee joint (pain, range of motion, stability) and function (walking distance, ability to climb stairs). When calculating the score, deductions are taken for assistive devices and flexion contractures, misalignment, or extension lag.
Time frame: after 3 months
The KSS contains questions in 2 sections: knee joint (pain, range of motion, stability) and function (walking distance, ability to climb stairs). When calculating the score, deductions are taken for assistive devices and flexion contractures, misalignment, or extension lag.
Time frame: after 6 months
The KSS contains questions in 2 sections: knee joint (pain, range of motion, stability) and function (walking distance, ability to climb stairs). When calculating the score, deductions are taken for assistive devices and flexion contractures, misalignment, or extension lag.
Time frame: after 12 months
The KSS contains questions in 2 sections: knee joint (pain, range of motion, stability) and function (walking distance, ability to climb stairs). When calculating the score, deductions are taken for assistive devices and flexion contractures, misalignment, or extension lag.
Time frame: after 24 months
The KSS contains questions in 2 sections: knee joint (pain, range of motion, stability) and function (walking distance, ability to climb stairs). When calculating the score, deductions are taken for assistive devices and flexion contractures, misalignment, or extension lag.
Time frame: at baseline (Day 0)
The KOOS is self-administered and assesses five outcomes: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life
Time frame: after 3 months
The KOOS is self-administered and assesses five outcomes: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life
Time frame: after 6 months
The KOOS is self-administered and assesses five outcomes: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life
Time frame: after 12 months
The KOOS is self-administered and assesses five outcomes: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life
Time frame: after 24 months
The KOOS is self-administered and assesses five outcomes: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life
Time frame: at baseline (day 0)
a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment
Time frame: after 3 months
a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment
Time frame: after 6 months
a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment
Time frame: after 12 months
a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment
Time frame: after 24 months
a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Other
Comparison of Customized and Standard Total Knee Replacements: a Pilot Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05495334
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07721116
Arthritis, Artificial Intelligence
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT06507046
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Kristiansund, Møre and Romsdal, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT07484594
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Islamabad, AL, Pakistan
View Trial Details