Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01904019

Comparison of ARPE Prosthesis With the Literature

This study is designed to document the objective and subjective measurements after trapeziometacarpal athroplasty with ARPE prosthesis and to compare those to literature values of outcome after trapeziectomy and trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI), as published in a recent meta-analysis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

SPM Deurne

Deurne, 2100, Belgium

About this study

The primary objective is to compare functional outcome at 3 years after trapezio-metarcarpal arthroplasty with trapeziectomy and trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. Literature values obtained by a recently published meta analysis will be used.

The secondary objectives are:

  • to compare functional outcome at 1 and at 5 years after trapezio-metarcarpal arthroplasty with trapeziectomy and trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition
  • to determine pre- and post-operative HR QOL
  • Incidence of radiolucencies at each follow up time point. Literature values from the same meta analysis will be used,

Patients will be assessed at preoperatively, and at 1, 3 and 5 years postoperatively. Measured Outcomes: grip strength, tip pinch strength, key pinch strength, pain, occurrence of adverse events, hand function.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion/exclusion criteria are identical to those indications and contraindications stated in the package insert of the implant.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with trapezio-metacarpal arthritis Eaton Stage of trapezio-metacarpal arthritis: Stage II - IV
  • patients willing to return for follow up evaluation.

Exclusion criteria

  • local or systemic infections
  • severe muscular, neurological or vascular deficiencies of the extremity involved
  • bone destruction or poor bone to affect implant stability
  • allergy to any of the components of the implant

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Grip Strength

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 1, 3 and 5 years follow-up

    Grip strength is an indicator of muscle health in the hands and forearms and is measured with a hand-held dynamometer. The patients squeeze the dynamometer with all of their strength and the force applied is measured.

  2. Key Pinch Strength

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 1, 3 and 5 years follow-up

    Key pinch strength is an indicator of muscle health and measures the precision grip by using a pinch dynamometer. The device is placed between the radial side of the index finger and thumb and the force applied while the patients pinch as hard as possible is measured.

  3. Tip Pinch Strength

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 1, 3 and 5 years follow-up

    Tip pinch strength is an indicator of muscle health and measures the precision grip by using a pinch dynamometer. The device is placed between the tip of the index finger and thumb and the force applied while the patients pinch as hard as possible is measured.

  4. VAS Pain

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 1, 3 and 5 years follow-up

    Pain level is collected with VAS (Visual Analog Scale): the patients are asked to mark their current pain level on a horizontal line containing values ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Motion - ROM Measurement - Radial Abduction

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 1, 3 and 5 years follow-up

    The range of motion (ROM) is the extent of movement of a joint and indicates the range through which the joint can be moved. ROM in radial abduction is measured while the patients move the thumb in parallel to the palm.

  2. Motion - ROM Measurement - Palmar Abduction

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 1, 3 and 5 years follow-up

    The range of motion (ROM) is the extent of movement of a joint and indicates the range through which the joint can be moved. The ROM in palmar abduction is measured while the patients move the thumb perpendicularly to the palm.

  3. EQ-5D - Health Status Score

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 1, 3 and 5 years follow-up

    EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for measuring the health-related quality of life, which assesses health status in terms of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each question has five levels of response (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems/unable to), which are singularly rated and then combined into a health status score. The health status score ranges from less than 0 (where 0 is the value of a health state equivalent to dead; negative values representing values as worse than dead) to 1 (the value of full health), with higher scores indicating higher health utility.

  4. EQ-5D - VAS Score

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 1, 3 and 5 years follow-up

    The second part of the EQ-5D questionnaire consists of a visual analogue scale (VAS) on which the patient rates his/her perceived health from 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health).

  5. Number of Implants With Visible Radiolucency Line Around the Implanted Prosthesis

    Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 years follow-up

    Radiolucency lines are radiolucent gaps visible in the radiographic images between the prosthesis and the bone, which presence is commonly associated with early failure of the implantation, eventually leading to the loosening of the prosthesis. Every radiography taken at each follow-up time point was assessed to evaluate whether there are visible radiolucency lines around the implanted prosthesis and the number of implants with visible radiolucency lines is here reported.

  6. Hand Function: DASH Questionnaire - Disability

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 1, 3 and 5 years follow-up

    The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Questionnaire outcome measure is a 30-item, self-report questionnaire designed to assess the patients' health status during the previous week by asking to rate their ability to perform various daily activities. The questions are grouped in 3 categories: disability, work and sport, of which work and sport are optional.

    The score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability), with higher scores indicating a greater level of disability and severity, whereas lower scores indicate a lower level of disability.

  7. Hand Function: DASH Questionnaire - Work

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 1, 3 and 5 years follow-up

    The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Questionnaire outcome measure is a 30-item, self-report questionnaire designed to assess the patients' health status during the previous week by asking to rate their ability to perform various daily activities. The questions are grouped in 3 categories: disability, work and sport, of which work and sport are optional.

    The score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability), with higher scores indicating a greater level of disability and severity, whereas lower scores indicate a lower level of disability.

  8. Hand Function: DASH Questionnaire - Sport

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 1, 3 and 5 years follow-up

    The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Questionnaire outcome measure is a 30-item, self-report questionnaire designed to assess the patients' health status during the previous week by asking to rate their ability to perform various daily activities. The questions are grouped in 3 categories: disability, work and sport, of which work and sport are optional.

    The score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability), with higher scores indicating a greater level of disability and severity, whereas lower scores indicate a lower level of disability.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Zimmer Biomet

Industry

Collaborators

  • Biomet Belgium BVBA

Registry information

Official study title

Trapezio-metacarpal Arthroplasty: Comparison of ARPE Prosthesis With the Literature.

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jul 19, 2013
Registry last updated
Oct 18, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.